User talk:AliciaZag13

sand split? sand spit? or what?
Hi Alicia,

In this version of the Kerri Walsh Jennings page, your edit appears to have a typo. I don't think there's such a thing as a "sand split" (except this one), so I suspect that

"Walsh trained on the sand split between Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach in Los Angeles, California, and..."

was intended to be:

"Walsh trained on the sand spit between Hermosa Beach and Manhattan Beach in Los Angeles, California, and..."

Am I right? Is that what you meant?

spit. n. A narrow point of land extending into a body of water.

The only problem is that when I look at the beach in Google Earth, there's no spit there. So I'm confused. What did you mean?

I'm going to copy this question to the article's Talk page, so please reply there. NCdave (talk) 02:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I believe the word "split" was a typo. I did not add it to the article. At the time in question I was doing a little re-write and I did not check carefully to see if the earlier writing had errors. In the edit you reference I just moved down previous content to a lower position on the page. The word was actually added to the article with this edit by IP editor 66.27.161.134 back in May 2012. I am sorry to say I do not know the area in question well, so I could not tell you if there is a spit between those beaches or not, nor do I have sourcing for the claim that she trained there. Maybe the author just meant a sandy area in-between the two main beaches? Sorry it has taken me so long to respond! Thanks for helping to improve the page!! AliciaZag13 (talk) 01:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

AliciaZag13/Editing tools
Hi. Just letting you know that you created this page in the wrong namespace. So I've moved it to User:AliciaZag13/Editing tools. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 21:45, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh, I know! I was just trying to fix that. Thanks!! AliciaZag13 (talk) 21:46, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Hey Alish, does this work?


 * Nope. The "short cut" goes to a redirect page. Hmm. Don't quite get the short cut thing.AliciaZag13 (talk) 03:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Wait a minute, Lish. Suppose you go like this WP:NOCITE and place the short cut key inside double brackets. Does that work?


 * Sure does!! AliciaZag13 (talk) 03:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Bridgette Andersen
Hi, can you please give some attention to the Bridgette Andersen article? Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 20:14, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I am sorry to say I really don't know that much about her, except that she was in a favorite movie of mine, and that she died very young from a drug overdose. Very sad. There is a DVD version of Savannah Smiles which has interviews with Mark Miller and Teresa Andersen, Bridgette's mother. If I can find it I will see what I can learn. Thanks for thinking of me. AliciaZag13 (talk) 20:44, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

User page sandboxes
Hello, I am curious about the status of the user pages which you have created, namely:
 * User:AliciaZag13/Editing tools
 * User:AliciaZag13/Holly McPeak
 * User:AliciaZag13/Misty May-Treanor
 * User:AliciaZag13/Kerri Walsh
 * User:AliciaZag13/ET
 * It seems that you have been using them as sandboxes, primarily as a means to improve articles you work on, such as Holly McPeak. That's totally legitimate. However, as I read WP:UP, I have some questions:
 * 1) Have the rules of WP:Copying within Wikipedia been observed here, especially for content that you did not create, especially in regards to providing attribution for the authors of that content? In the edit description you can use: Copied content from   ; see that page's history for attribution
 * 2) Have you considered removing content which is no longer needed, because you have incorporated it into mainspace articles?
 * 3) What is the purpose or relevance of content such as what appears to be medical chart entries?
 * 4) Some content seems to have been copied from administrative noticeboards. Is it your intent to archive this for some reason?
 * Thanks in advance for your help! 70.162.235.236 (talk) 02:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Savannah Smiles
Just edit the article. Don't let an anon IP stop you. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 23:36, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I think its worth pointing out the common misunderstanding about the story, but I would rather not change it back without other editors weighing in and supporting the change. Thanks though. AliciaZag13 (talk) 00:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of The Nine Lives of Christmas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Nine Lives of Christmas, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/The Nine Lives of Christmas (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)