User talk:AmberLovesEverything

August 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Flash animation are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Meters (talk) 04:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Bump to level 3. Virtually every talk page edit made has been a WP:NOTAFORUM vio. Meters (talk) 04:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Office (American TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 20:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Happy Tree Friends. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 10:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Animation moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Internet Animation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Internet Animation (March 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, lacks any sources or references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Internet Animation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Internet Animation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AmberLovesEverything! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:30, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Windows Media Video, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 03:31, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English[edit]

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Veggie burger, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. There was nothing wrong with "chips." Julietdeltalima (talk) 20:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

French fries is French Fries[edit]

I changed it because, Just in case that people are confused.

It isn't. You aren't correct. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:57, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

French fries is okay if the article is written in American English (which this one was!). Be careful about correcting British English to US English in articles which are actually about British subjects, though, or which happen to have been otherwise written in British English - Wikipedia shouldn't mix and match different regional spellings or terms. See WP:ENGVAR for more details. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think there are two issues going on here: whether those beloved long fried potato batons are "French fries" or "chips," which is a WP:ENGVAR issue, or whether they are "French Fries" versus "French fries," a capitalization issue, as the user's section heading appears to discuss. There is no circumstance in which "French Fries" is correct. They are "French fries" in the U.S. and "chips" in most other places. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 14:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 15:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did nothing wrong[edit]

I was just making corrective edits, That's all.

In this edit you removed maintenance tags without addressing the issue at all. You have been warned about this before. It is disruptive. Notfrompedro (talk) 15:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, You can revised the maintenance tags.

Concern regarding Draft:Internet Animation[edit]

Hello, AmberLovesEverything. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Internet Animation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Internet Animation[edit]

Hello, AmberLovesEverything. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Internet Animation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:30, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]