User talk:Antioco79

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Dawn bard (talk) 01:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Dawn bard (talk) 01:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Dawn bard (talk) 01:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Important Platonists
Hi Antioco79. Concerning which entries should be bold on the platonism template, lets see if we can't thrash out a compromise? To me an important platonist would be someone who we know a lot about or who has left behind significant surviving works. I can't personally see how someone like Aedesius can be rated important on that scale (at least, compared to anyone else on the template), but clearly you've got a different set of criteria. I certainly could be persuaded that some of the characters you've highlighted might be deserving to be rated alongside Plato and Plotinus. Cheers! Singinglemon (talk) 02:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)