User talk:Anton V.

Your GA nomination of Audi S and RS models
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Audi S and RS models you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anton V. -- Anton V. (talk) 08:01, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Audi S and RS models
The article Audi S and RS models you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Audi S and RS models for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 14:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Audi S and RS models
The article Audi S and RS models you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Audi S and RS models for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 23:01, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Audi Q8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quattro ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Audi_Q8 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Audi_Q8?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Village Pump
About your concern of my photographing skill and I'm all down to constructive criticism, but saying "I would recommend the participant to study courses on how to properly photograph. And I suggest using the bot to replace the images with more appropriate ones" is rather insulting per say. I have been beginning to be less forceful when inserting photos taken by me and trying to work alongside another user who has been doing the same. I been practising photographing since 2016 and have been trying to get cues from past photographers when it comes to cars. Such as M 93, Rudolf Stricker, IFCAR, and even Charles01 which despite having a few unpleasant collision, he was one of my main inspiration of what I'm doing to this day. I massively upload yes, it what I do, but like what the others said on there, you don't need to be a top-notch photographer to participating in the Commons. Although sorta hypocritical myself since the impression I been inevitably giving in the past week isn't any better. Comments like you did there would deter any newfound photographers who might be interested in doing what I'm doing. Just keep that in mind. --Vauxford (talk) 22:46, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Dear Vauxford, you should understand that you should use the best photos for posting images in articles. The articles have already used good photos of other participants, and you massively replace their photos with your own. Think of other members and quality. I myself practice photographing cars from 2012 and am a professional photographer in the "Google local guide".--Anton V. (talk) 08:00, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * So what? I might not be the best but I take good enough photos that people are happy with, even without my intervention and if they aren't happy with them I discuss. With your condescending attitude you had in the village pump, there won't be anyone participating in the Commons because you expect the top notch, professional grade photographers to be on there, doesn't work like that I'm afraid. --Vauxford (talk) 10:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You have good photos, and other participants upload photos of different quality, try to upload photos that are not enough, and do not replace those that are already used, especially if the photos are of professional quality. If you want to improve your level of photographer, I can offer you to take part in the Google Local Guides.--Anton V. (talk) 12:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * P.S.: You have the most successful of the categories of photos at the moment, the most suitable for placement in articles.

Example Among these categories, your photos are most suitable for use.


 * Therefore, consider this not as an insult but as a remark.--Anton V. (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

WP:VP/Technical
Hi Anton, I've removed your thread over at WP:VP/T as it related nothing to that page, The Technical page is used to report various errors/bugs on the site and obviously your report wasn't bug-reporting,

If you have an issue with an editor then please take your concerns to WP:ANI and not every random notieboard on the site, Many thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:53, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, it may be possible to resolve the issue in another way, the issue is already discussed by the topic above. Thank.--Anton V. (talk) 03:38, 27 June 2019 (UTC)