User talk:Aoidh/Archives/2021

Orphaned non-free image File:Deathmatch Village.png
Thanks for uploading File:Deathmatch Village.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Deathmatch Village for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deathmatch Village is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deathmatch Village until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed,Rosguill talk 22:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Deathmatch Village.png
Thanks for uploading File:Deathmatch Village.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:LibreOffice Impress
Hello, Aoidh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LibreOffice Impress, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:LibreOffice Impress


Hello, Aoidh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LibreOffice Impress".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:56, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Why can’t I do good edits...
From the puppy dog pals edit that was the good one, to now with the fight between blender software edits, why can’t I do good edits? I’m good faith! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.75.9.45 (talk • contribs)
 * I never questioned your good faith, that doesn't make it a good edit though. The edit was problematic for several reasons which I listed in my edit summary. - Aoidh (talk) 01:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

This is my new account now... Abigblueworld (talk) 02:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Unmerge horror film 1970s–1980s section
I wonder why the 1970s and 1980s section on horror film are merged together I mean the 70s was the decade that started modern horror shouldn't the 70s be its own section and the 80s its own section like this 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s just to look proper and the 1970s section should have its own history and the 1980s section should have its own history. Hiffododif (talk) 16:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

I know why the 1890s–1910s section are because that was just the beginning until the 1920s I know they where silent but they where still major horror film shouldn't there be a 1970s section and a 1980s section to Horror film like this. 1890s–1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s See how I unmerge the 1970s–1980s section can you do that? Hiffododif (talk) 16:59, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that's not my area of knowledge at all and is something I know nothing about. I would suggest starting a discussion on the article's talk page. - Aoidh (talk) 17:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
 * FYI this is a LTA / blockevading sock puppeteer MrOllie (talk) 17:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah once I started looking at why that page was protected, and that they were asking about the same stuff that got the talk page protected, it seemed obvious so I went to lunch instead of messing with that at the moment. Seems like their blocked now so everything worked out. - Aoidh (talk) 03:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Try to but horror film's talk page is protected. Hiffododif (talk) 17:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Do you mind if you give them my message if you can be able to talk to them. Hiffododif (talk) 17:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

You are destructive
Yes there is no article about the blackPanther OS because the destructive people like you deleted the article 5 times before! Last time the reason was that because there are no another articles which refer to this distro. And now you did not allowed it to refer. And it is not a new fork of an Ubuntu fork or something like that. The blackPanther OS is a 20 years old independent development. And it is a popular distro in its home country. I was one of them who once tried to write an article about this distro, I have worked 2 days on that article, but after a few minutes of the publication it was deleted by a person with similar mentality to you. Good job, the deletions are the best contributions on the Wikipedia... Ncr0drX (talk) 17:16, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If it was deleted it's probably because it wasn't notable. However, I had nothing to do with that and cannot comment on it. What I can tell you is that articles need reliable sources to show notability, and I can't find a trace of anything for this distro. List of Linux distributions is an article for notable distros, not a catch-all for anything that exists and because of that, your distro will not be included there unless and until there is an article for it that shows notability for the subject. - Aoidh (talk) 17:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!


Huggums537 (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Huggums537 (talk) 15:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)