User talk:April 31st

Welcome!
Hello, April 31st, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Bearian (talk) 17:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Disambiguation link notification for June 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unidentified Black Males, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whitecaps ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Unidentified_Black_Males check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Unidentified_Black_Males?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

WP:V and WP:OR
When you add or change facts in Wikipedia, you need to cite your sources (see WP:V), and you must *have* published sources (see WP:OR). -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Grammar & sentences
Hi - I notice that you are undoing or reverting some of my edits to articles on the episodes from The Sopranos. You're obviously editing in good faith, but I want to point out that one of the big problems with those articles is that antecedents ("his", "who", etc.) are often unclear. So I'm going to re-do my edits to those sections. I'm not interested in an edit war. But some of the re-revisions you've done have made the articles less clear. -Special-T (talk) 18:29, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * You seem to be following other editors around "Sopranos" episode articles and restoring your preferred versions. I'm not interested in an edit war.  Do whatever you want.  I'll move on to editing some other area of Wikipedia. Special-T (talk) 14:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi- as noted above, it seems you're still restoring your preferred versions of "Sopranos" episode reviews whenever the text is altered by another editor. The goal here is to collaboratively improve these articles for accuracy and clarity; many of your summaries are incomplete, inaccurate or speculative in their details, and difficult to parse because of unattributed antecedents ("his", "who", etc). 2601:189:8001:C3F0:188E:3424:6443:16BE (talk) 13:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I am not "following other editors around" as you discourteously wrote. I am watching the Sopranos synopses, and trying to retain their quality and their concision.
 * I agree that antecedents should be clear. We have no dispute about that.
 * It is simply not true that I am just restoring my preferred versions. Of course, not every proposed change is worth keeping but very often, out of respect for other editors, I incorporate their suggestions, though often rewritten and condensed.
 * Wikipedia recommends that a synopsis of a television episode should be just 400 words. That cannot apply to the Sopranos because so much is packed into each episode, but it is a reminder that synopses should be as brief as possible and only give basic information. In the synopsis of 'Irregular Round the Margins' you write about a darts match between Tony and Adriana, about darts dropping to the floor, and Adriana picking them up, and finding herself kneeling in front of Tony. That is very good drama, but in a synopsis it is, I'm afraid, a text-book example of unnecessary information. You write that they are interrupted "by a knock at the front door". Even those seven words are unnecessary information. April 31st (talk) 07:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

February 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Grift of the Magi, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

From Russia with Love
I suggest you don't put back the contested version (you are messing around with a Featured Article. I will explain on the talk page, which is where the matter should be discussed. - SchroCat (talk) 07:53, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)