User talk:Aradic-es

HI there, Aradic
Please send me an email, I'd like to discuss something with you. Hobartimus (talk) 14:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Forums again...
Ok, here's the thing. People use sources to reinforce pieces of text, right? For example, when you've got a university publication for a source, the stuff it supports is virtually untouchable. An ordinary book or respectable news article is pretty good as well, etc. HOWEVER, when you use some blog or forum(!) for a "source", not only does that not help you at all - it actually makes it look like your text is POV-pushing and will get it removed sooner than if it wasn't sourced at all. :)

The bottom line is: forums are NOT sources. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 18:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Personal attacks and edits made on Habsburg Empire
Please do not attack other editors, as you did here. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. -- B@xter 9 13:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- B@xter 9 13:45, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Additional information needed on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Esemono
Hello. Thank you for filing Sockpuppet investigations/Esemono. This is an automated notice to inform you that the case is currently missing a code letter, which indicates to checkusers why a check is valid. Please revisit the page and add this. Sincerely, SPCUClerkbot (talk) 11:26, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

WP:OWN
As you have shown here, you apparently think that users own articles on this website. This is not the case. If you look just below the edit window when editing a page, you'll see the following text: Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. You irrevocably agree to release your contributions under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. You agree to be credited, at minimum, through a hyperlink or URL when your contributions are reused in any form. See the Terms of Use for details. Relevant text has been bolded. For further info, please read WP:OWN.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs  00:31, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of United Kingdom during Yugoslav wars
I have nominated United Kingdom during Yugoslav wars, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/United Kingdom during Yugoslav wars. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nickhh (talk) 00:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Do not blank this article's talkpage. You will be blocked if you persist. Buckshot06(prof) 21:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Too busy
Hi Aradic. I am too busy at present to add much content to wikipedia. However, I keep a daily watch on Karadjordjevo agreement and some related articles just to make sure people aren't removing large amounts of sourced information. I've put too much effort into that article to watch it being destroyed. :) I don't really care too much about following yours and Producer's crazy wikipedia war. Polargeo (talk) 08:42, 16 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I have some information to add to your page on the UK when you are ready to start the new article. I think it may add some balance. I can find much more that will balance the article nicely if you like.

UK support of Croatia during the breakup of Yugolavia
“Croatia’s case was presented with considerable sympathy in the Western media.” Even “left and liberal circles in the United Kingdom […] had fallen under the spell of Croatian nationalism. These people demonstrated their solidarity with a small minded, right-wing autocrat [Tuđman]”. Misha Glenny, a UK journalist working in Yugoslavia was telephoned in his hotel room by Serbs screaming at him for supposedly supporting the “Ustashas”, meaning the Croats.

Please please just stop this now
The repeated addition of information about Bosniaks and Turks must stop. The following paragraph alone should earn you a block from ever editing Bosniaks.
 * "Despite the thing that some famous Bosniaks like actor Emir Hadžihafizbegović claimed that most Bosniaks actually have been supporting Croatia, there was no record about organized supporting Bosniaks to Croatian team.Some Bosniak journalists have described that as the final victory of Ratko Mladić. (Ratko Mladić was famous for his statement after conquest of Srebrenica and later massacre, on July 11 1995 described it as revenge to the Turks)" Polargeo (talk) 17:27, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

AN notification
See Administrators'_noticeboard. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions
Alright, enough. Per ARBMAC (notification here), I am topic-banning you from Bosniaks for the next week. Violate this ban and I will block you. I find your edits inappropriate, but your refusal to discuss them and continued edit warring is enough. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Also, do things like this again and you will blocked. I have little patience for that kind of editing. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)


 * A few points. First, from this, I shouldn't have to remind you of our no personal attacks policy.  Second, the country is Bosnia and Herzegovina, not Herzegovina itself.  Your link to Herzegovinian Croat goes to Croats of Bosnia and Herzegovina so what are thinking that adds?  I'm not going to argue about it too much, but flying-by controversial edits are not appropriate on these topics and because of the number of editors who have not acted appropriately, Arbcom has given broad latitude to administrators over this area.  -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:38, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * There are methods to appeal any discretionary sanctions. The current noticeboard is fine with me, but you may consider other methods if you would like (WP:ANI may be appropriate).  However, I issued the sanctions over your edits at Bosniaks, with the other point being minor to me.  -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:03, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Aradic is arguing over the minor points. The major point is adding "Ratko Mladić was famous for his statement after conquest of Srebrenica and later massacre, on July 11 1995 described it as revenge to the Turks" I won't go into it in detail but it is not right to add this to Bosniaks and I think Aradic knows he has gone too far. Polargeo (talk) 07:10, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * If Aradic thinks he's gone too far, he sure has an odd way of showing it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely
Forget it. We're done here. This attitude is totally inappropriate and you continued edit warring at Blaž Kraljević is enough for me. The prior blocks show no effort on your part to improve. This nonsense is either extreme denial or a willful blindness I don't think anyone should have to bother with anymore. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

I was referring to the content dispute at Blaž Kraljević: He is Herzegovinian Croat but referred as  Bosnian Croat and I got blocked indefinitely because of that ??? Añtó&#124; Àntó (talk) 12:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

If you want this settled by the Arbitration committee, the proper way will be to file an appeal with their "Ban Appeals Subcommittee" by e-mail to "arbcom-l (at) lists.wikimedia.org". They will either decide your appeal by off-wiki deliberation, or if they decide they want a public case about it, then somebody will unblock you conditionally so you can participate on the Arbcom pages. Until then, the block stands, as far as I am concerned. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:03, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Burned police car in Široki brijeg.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Burned police car in Široki brijeg.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oleola (talk) 18:27, 27 March 2018 (UTC)