User talk:Arek333

Debuts
Could I ask you to stop writing "debuts for the first time" in multiple articles? A debut is the first appearance of something. Saying something debuts "for the first time" is redundant; nothing debuts for a second or third time, etc. Just say it debuts.  General Ization Talk  23:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 1941 into 1941 in the United States. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:51, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 1969 in the United States, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Elizium23 (talk) 04:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 1969 in the United States, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   Elizium23 (talk) 18:53, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Allison Enchelmayer


A tag has been placed on Allison Enchelmayer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:04, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Ian Livingstone
Please go ahead. You do not need permission to amend any unprotected article. That why Wikipedia is so amazing. Have fun! JMcC (talk) 08:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Hinsdale Police Department moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hinsdale Police Department, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – robertsky (talk) 07:06, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
– robertsky (talk) 08:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:ArekSmith&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/ArekSmith. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 10:47, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello. You used to use the account to edit. It was blocked in December last year. After that point you started using your other account, Arek333, to edit. Although I appreciate you want to edit Wikipedia, by editing after you were blocked on one account that is block evasion. If you want to edit Wikipedia you need to request an unblock addressing why you were originally blocked. If you want further explanation please say so, but ignoring this and continuing to edit by using another account or IP address will result in further blocks on those accounts and/or IP addresses. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 10:51, 23 June 2021 (UTC)