User talk:Askelaadden

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Askelaadden, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

request
I've seen that you are interesting in north african history so I have a request for you. Could you give a look at the talk in zirid dynasty page about the capital. I want to see some third opinion about the topic. If you finished reading my request you are free to delet it.This would be very much appreciated PS : if you don't wan't to wright anything in that highly controversial page you are free to give your reply on my personal talk page. Sss2sss (talk) 23:37, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Note re translations
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When translating a foreign-language Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've translated content, disclosing the translation and linking to the translated page, e.g.,  It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted translated template on the talk pages of the page you placed the translation. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have translated material before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Second Battle of Amgala has been accepted
 Second Battle of Amgala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Second_Battle_of_Amgala help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:23, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Marinid Sultanate, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Achir moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Achir, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 12:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Missing cite in Battle of Al Mahbes (1985)
The article cites "Strategic Survey" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script (explained at Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors) to highlight such errors in the future. Thanks, Renata (talk) 04:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Undoing editing in 2020–2021 Western Saharan clashes
As mention in Edit summary, UN nor FAR mention anything about Moroccan casualties , You are welcome to show me UN or MINURSO source saying FAR took casualties , or only side claiming casualties exist is Front , undoing editing because it is against your POV is against Wikipedia policy , if possible don't let happen again
 * Hello, The International Crisis Group is renowned for being a quality independent source of fact. Trying to censor it is therefore POV-push.
 * Regards, --Askelaadden (talk) 20:04, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, International Crisis Group mention on their rapport that they use "Crisis Group telephone interviews, MINURSO official, November-December 2020 ", checking on actual MINURSO statement from the same period , no mention of casualties this continue into march, "continues to receive unconfirmed reports of sporadic firing across the berm." If you manage to find MINURSO official saying that they were report of 2 casualties between November-December 2020, you would be proving the claim of International Crisis Group , but if Not , then it is not simply true , and they are citing MINURSO as source here. trying to defend false information is POV-push, correcting that isn't : Regards, -- 01:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)


 * What you are doing is a WP:OR in an attempt to discredit the International Crisis Group. Wikipedia doesn't work that way.
 * Otherwise ICG is talking about telephone interviews they conducted with sources in the UN mission MINURSO, not official reports.
 * Finally, the fact that you want to impose the point of view of the Moroccan armed forces by censoring the International Crisis Group is POV-Pushing. By the way, here is how the :UNHCR describes the Crisis Group: "The Brussels-based International Crisis Group (ICG) is an independent, non-profit, multinational organization, with over 80 staff on five continents, working through field-based analysis and high-level advocacy to prevent and resolve deadly conflict. ICG's approach is grounded in field research. Teams of political analysts are located within or close by countries at risk of outbreak, escalation or recurrence of violent conflict. Based on information and assessments from the field, ICG produces regular analytical reports containing practical recommendations targeted at key international decision-takers".
 * Regards,--Askelaadden (talk) 07:40, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

there is difference between following source claim and discrediting it, taking source because it does support your POV and claiming the opposition discredit it because they simply follow claim is WP:OR , not other way around , and as you said wikipedia doesn't work that way. only way we can know for certain is about casualties and reality on ground is through MINURSO, not 3rd party sources , and it is not like MINURSO doesn't rapport casualties when they happen , as example , MINURSO was notified of death of head of gendarmerie of front few days ago , ignoring this fact and choosing source that you like is POV-Pushing , claiming the opposition doesn't have right to follow the information to sources is WP:OR. and simply following MINURSO official rapport on ground isn't pushing point of view of the Moroccan armed forces, unless you actually believe POV of front that say MINURSO work with occupation army , they are neutral party in this conflict. We have neutral party on ground that is quite capable of reporting any ceasefire to UN, so far their rapport do not bypass harassment fire , ignoring this fact is POV-pushing
 * Regards, -- 01:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABIDALAA (talk • contribs)

Hello ABIDALAA, The fact that you want to censor a serious, independent, reputable source is POV pushing, that's undeniable. However, you are free to add other serious sources if you have any alongside the CRISIS GROUP source. Regards, --Askelaadden (talk) 23:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, i don't think asking you to use MINURSO as source is POV pushing , unless you subscribe to idea that they are same as Moroccan royal army , and they both Conspire to hide the truth casualties of this supposed "war" , something that is ridiculous this situation. all i am asking is to use MINURSO since it is neutral party on ground, and they hadn't yet confirm or announce any Moroccan casualties. this is very simple, without mental gymnastics , using MINURSO as source isn't POV , claiming that MINURSO doesn't rapport Moroccan casualties is POV , if you cannot provide any confirmation from MINURSO on those casualties, then number is disputed. Regards, --ABIDALAA (talk) 12:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, if you have a source from MINURSO about the number of casualties, feel free to add it into the article.
 * Otherwise, please do not censor other serious and independant sources like you did because you don't like them or because they don't support your POV.
 * Regards, --Askelaadden (talk) 12:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, i already done that , both MINURSO Press Briefing from 17 NOVEMBER 2020 to 1 MARCH 2021 , and both have same conclusion , unconfirmed reports of sporadic firing across the berm , not bombing , nor raids inside Southern Morocco , but Rather sporadic harassment fire , , , no mention of casualties. and i am not the one suggesting MINURSO and Royal Moroccan army trying to hide Moroccans Casualties so i can be consider pushing my POV, right ? ignoring existing of MINURSO and citing them for things they never said using 3rd party source. since we both on agreement here to use MINURSO we should use the other draft that only rely on MINURSO Press Briefing rather then calling POV Regards ABIDALAA (talk 20:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * As you said and as the sources specify, the number of casualties is not revealed by MINURSO. We must therefore keep the Crisis Group source.
 * --Askelaadden (talk) 20:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

"Not revealed" applied there is casualties, as this is matter of dispute here, MINURSO hasn't mentioned any casualties, but rather harrassment sporadic fire, nothing more or less , as they hadn't confirmed Crisis group source , going on conclusion they are hiding numbers or refusing to revealed them is WP:OR. Regards --ABIDALAA (talk) 23:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC) Exactly, casualties numbers are unrevealed by the MINURSK so we must stick to Crisis Group numbers until the MINURSO reveals their numbers. Regards, --Askelaadden (talk) 23:05, 10 April 2021 (UTC) Now you aren't even trying, that's WP:OR, you are suggesting MINURSO hiding casualties , same as what Front claim. I know you are unlikely to be convinced, so i would refer this conversation in talk page for the subject Regards --ABIDALAA (talk) 09:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

zirid dynasty
Hi you wanted me to explain why I reverted the last edits. I didn't explain it because I thought it was clear.
 * there is no reason to delete the origin of the zirids from kabylia. It is documented by all of the historians thzt's why I've restored it. You can clearly see it mentionned in encyclopedia britannica so why not on wikipedia ? https://www.britannica.com/topic/Zirid-Dynasty
 * the addition of the category "history of algeria" is unncessary because it would trigger other categories wich would need to be added like history of spain (grenada), morocco, tunisia,malta... So there is no need to specifically chose one over other categories

Some baklava for you!

 * Hi, Thanks for your message and for the help offered !! All the best ! --Askelaadden (talk) 00:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

List of wars involving Algeria
Hi, I wanted to know what you think of my work, on the subject ?

KarimAohh


 * Hi ,
 * Very good work on the List of wars involving Algeria page. However, there is some stylistic work to be done to make the list more organized as it can be on the fr.wp.
 * Regards ! --Askelaadden (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello
Hello can i know why when algeria adds roman history and fatimid caliphate to its history its fine but when Morocco adds almohad and almoravid wars to its history it instantly gets deleted Rayooni (talk) 14:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

List of wars involving Algeria
Hi, ,

how are you doing? I’d like to have your opinion "List of wars involving Algeria" it risks having a publishing war

KarimAohh (talk) 21:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Capture of Fez (1554)
If the IPs continue changing it without source, request protection at WP:RFPP. The months-long edit/revert cycle doesn't look good. Hemanthah (talk) 14:09, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your advice, I will definitely do that next time. --Askelaadden (talk) 08:36, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Zirids History
Ok hello, ny friend i guess you love talking about "History" of Algeria... The map is very wrong since its from Fatimids Caliphate not The Zirids... also its look like Paint more than map Zirides sous les Fatimides.PNG Also the are a lot of nonsenses like the Moroccan Slaves...etc. The most important think it was Tunisia (Ifriqiya) Berber Dynasty IbnTashfin97 (talk) 15:33, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello IbnTashfin97, the map is well sourced and was agreed on the talk page of Zirid Dynasty by contributors. --Askelaadden (talk) 09:09, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)