User talk:Austin.p.harper

"Related" field in Template:Infobox television
As per the instructions for Template:Infobox television, which I suggested you read in my edit summaries, the "related" field is for "remakes, spin-offs, adaptations for different audiences, etc." None of the three TV programs meet these criteria (sharing characters is NOT a criteria), so they do not belong in the "related" field of other articles. Please also note that "chronology", which you added to Eureka (TV series), is not a valid field in the template. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:30, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Kansas Breweries
Hi. Your list needs citations from independent sources not connected to the breweries themselves. Brewery websites don't satisfy WP:NOT. The existing breweries without citations should be removed as well. Except that I'm in the process of adding citations. I would suggest gathering citations for the breweries you want to add and then doing the list all at once. "Planned businesses" are not acceptable under any circumstances for a list. See WP:LSC and WP:LISTCOMPANY for more on this. In the meantime your lists are going to keep getting deleted by various editors.Prof. Mc (talk) 15:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, why are you putting "Kansas-based" in the "Open Breweries" phrase. It's a list of Kansas breweries. Adding Kansas to the title of the section is redundant. Prof. Mc (talk) 16:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The name of the article is List of breweries in Kansas, not Kansas Breweries. That was to separate the breweries based in Kansas and those operating in Kansas but based elsewhere (Granite City and BJ's). Austin Harper 16:26, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * It's still kind of obvious, and doesn't follow the practice on the other "List of Breweries" pages. I'd leave it out. Prof. Mc (talk) 16:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I found a good article (Kansas beer breweries thriving, expanding) over at kansas.com that talks about almost all of the breweries I listed. I'll add it to the reference list along with adding the breweries back into the article. Austin Harper 16:26, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes. That's the one I used. But it's kind of weak since it's not really an article about those. It'll suffice, but I'm looking for other articles that talk about the breweries themsevles instead of just listing them. But yes, thanks. Definitely leave out the "Planned" though. Those are a no-no since "planned" doesn't mean "in existence." Prof. Mc (talk) 16:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll go ahead and use it for now, but I'll add better articles as I find them. I've also found a few so far, but a lot of those article aren't much more than just saying "Hey, there's a brewery in town and here's its address..." I'll also update the citation for "Kansas beer breweries thriving" so they all have the same citation number.
 * I found good citations for all of the currently open breweries except: 23rd Street Brewery (Lawrence), Barnyard (Lawrence), Broadway St (Concordia), and Crazy Eye (Hiawatha). I also found four additional breweries that have registered with the state Kansas Department of Revenue Liquor License Search: Limestone (Russell), Plum Creek (Beloit), Fly Boy (Sylvan Grove), and Belleville (Galena). Would you mind helping me out finding some sources for these last few breweries? FYI, I'm planning on attending the opening day for both of the upcoming Wichita breweries (Central Standard and Hopping Gnome) so I'll be sure to list them on the page once they're open.

Welcome!

 * You aren't a newbie, but this was the easiest way I could find to template-in some stuff about the beer project. lol. Prof. Mc (talk) 16:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Problem with your custom signature
You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.


 * Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Remove anything in the text box.  (It might already be empty.)
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
 * Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Signatures. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 05:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Dicktown.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dicktown.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dicktown.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dicktown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)