User talk:Bamadawg

Recent edits
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Elizabeth Warren. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MastCell Talk 21:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

November 2019
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:John Solomon (political commentator) ‎ for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 14:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:The Epoch Times, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:54, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * To clarify, if I see it I'll block you indefinitely as WP:NOTHERE. Doug Weller  talk 10:13, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 10:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Spanish flu
Just a quick note here that I just another user and am not an admin. I do want to let you know in case you were not aware that Talk:Spanish Flu is subject to discretionary sanctions at the moment per the template and authorized here. I am bringing this up per your edit here which may not be compliant with Talk page guidelines and Etiquette. Again, please note that this is a friendly notice of caution. --Super Goku V (talk) 05:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Understood

Thank you F. L.  (talk) 14:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a discussion forum
Hi Bamadawg. Did you forget that warned you not to use article talk pages for inappropriate discussion, just a few months ago? Injecting this type of comment into an already heated content dispute is not helpful, and not consistent with Wikipedia's purpose. - MrX 🖋 17:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

I was trying to be honest, not helpful. If the standard is “all mainstream media” then it will not be met. That is a valid point and only an emotional partisan would see it any other way. F. L. (talk) 17:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)


 * This dropped off my watchlist. I'm trying to decide between an indefinite block and a topic ban from American Politics. You could still edit everywhere else, including those areas where you may have professional knowledge. Doug Weller  talk 18:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The proportion of good edits to disruptive edits is very low. I think an indef block is warranted, until such time as Bamadawg convinces us that they will refocus their efforts to improving the encyclopedia. - MrX 🖋 18:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

I’ll try to carry on, somehow F. L.  (talk) 18:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia has been garbage for some time now. So, have fun guys. I’ll continue keeping Wikipedia out of our academic endeavors and professional life. F. L. (talk) 18:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Joe Biden, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Video doesn’t lie. I won’t add any more truth to Wikipedia’s sham article on Biden. F. L. (talk) 20:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Just got email Checked your user page

You seem like an ok guy The truth won’t come out about Joe—it’s already out. But, I’ll respect your ruling F. L.  (talk) 20:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * , please look at this with your admin glasses--I'm about to go look at the user's other edits to see if 72 hours was too kind. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:23, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , this user does appear to have been simmering under the surface mostly, with that edit I RevDel'd last month being one of the few that rose above the surface. There's a case to go for indef. Their response to your block message is not encouraging. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Oh noes !!!!! F. L. (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Whatever. See ya soon, probably after the election. Will be interesting to see the propagandists here shill for whatever the narrative will be. F. L. (talk) 21:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 20:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Nothing can stop what is coming. 😂 F. L. (talk) 20:25, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 20:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

When Wikipedia decides it wants to be an encyclopedia and not a propaganda arm of leftists, I might come back. Or I’ll come back anyway after the election. F. L. (talk) 21:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)