User talk:Baroque1700

October 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Francisco de Aguirre, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Francisco de Aguirre was changed by Baroque1700 (c) (t) replacing content with useless junk on 2007-10-06T11:45:37+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 11:45, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

--- Antonio Baruffaldi --- hey, this is cf38, the guy who tidied the Antonio Baruffaldi‎ article. Fair enough about the 'famous' part, but you don't really think he was famous? By the way, I like the fact that you exert a lot of your energy onto painters. Nice one, we need more specific-subject users like you to help out. Keep it up mate!;)

Cf38 16:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Francisco de Aguirre
Hey, thanks for your contributions...humanities have traditionally been underrepresented in wikipedia and your participation in the project is thus even more welcome! It seems that you're new here, and I just wanted to point out that there's a better way to do moves than they way you moved Francisco de Aguirre to Francisco de Aguirre (conquistador), which I'm guessing was by cutting and pasting the text. Namely, it's by using the "Move" tab, located at the top of the article to the right of "Edit this page" and "History". If you use this handy thing, the page history and talk page will be moved to the new location as well, instead of being marooned at the old spot. I've temporarily undone your edit, which will be restored the proper way once a administrator gets around to it. Anyway, thanks again for your contribution! Erudy 19:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to second the above, as I notice you're still replacing existing articles with redirects to newly-created articles on the same topic. Please don't do this, but rather, use the "move" button.  It's a good deal simpler than fixing it afterwards, as is necessary to maintain the page history.  (See cut and paste moves for the details of that.)  Alai 22:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Santa Maria del Carmini di Venezia
Nice to see new articles on Italian architecture! A couple of questions about this one, though. Firstly shouldn’t it be del Carmine rather than del Carmini? Secondly I think di Venezia looks a bit odd in an English-language encyclopedia: it’s not really part of the title of the building, rather it’s a description of where it is to disambiguate it from other churches with the same name. So, if I am right on the first point, I’d be tempted to move the article to Santa Maria del Carmini (Venice). What do you think? Cheers. —Ian Spackman 05:20, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Santa Maria del Carmini (Venice). 1) The name used is Carmini. 2) I agree with moving the title to something other than di Venezia, I am using the list of churches in Venice as a spot from whence to leap. I had not looked to see if there is a "wiki established" format for such titles. From now on, I will switch to the format you suggest.Baroque1700 05:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, there isn’t really an established naming format for buildings (see talk:Florence Cathedral for one rather tense discussion on the topic), but the commonest usages are Building Name (Place) or Building Name, Place. Take your pick.


 * Are you certain about the ‘de l  Carmini’, though? Wouldn’t it be ‘Santa Maria de i  Carmini’ (like the Scuola dei Carmini which you mention in the article)? The Italian Wikipedia doesn’t yet have an article on the church, but it does have two red-links to it as ‘Santa Maria del Carmine’ (from it:Francesco_di_Giorgio_Martini and from the disambiguation page it:Chiesa di Santa Maria del Carmine), and one red-link to ‘Santa Maria dei Carmini’ (from it:Chiese_di_Venezia).


 * Anyway, keep up the good work. —Ian Spackman 10:17, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

I googled around, both are used. I find dei Carmini makes most sense (the church is also called del Carmelo. I will make the move and leave a redirectBaroque1700 21:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks —Ian Spackman 09:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Small request
Hey, first off, great job on all the artist articles you've created! You're doing an awesome job. I do have one small request, though. When you put the stub tag in the article, could you please place it after the categories? That way the "Italian painter stub" etc. category will show up at the end of the categories rather than at the front. I'd really appreciate it. Thanks and keep up the good work! :) --Hemlock Martinis 01:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I see you've started doing it, thank you very much! --Hemlock Martinis 19:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Cagnoni (engraver)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Cagnoni (engraver), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Cagnoni (engraver) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Cagnoni (engraver), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
For the addition to James Basire. Good stuff! Neil  ☎  12:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

painters categories
I think before you sub-categorise all the painters you should open discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts. Two questions that imediately spring to mind are:
 * 1) should sub-categorised articles be also removed from the main categories to try and reduce these monsters to a manageable size? - that would be normal practice.
 * 2) do we really want by-century categories within the Renaissance or other periods? - generally these are disliked, and there is inevitably a great amount of duplication. Johnbod (talk) 04:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Also, on your new articles, I would always check with this site which you will often find gives you a better name (ie as usually used) and dates than C19 sources. Johnbod (talk) 04:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * As I say, I think you should raise the matter at the Project, or I can if you like. The by-century renaissance category(ies) would I think be likely to merged at WP:CfD, following various precendents. Johnbod (talk) 06:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for your help on the Canale (surname) page. Much appreciated. Snowbound (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 22:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for your contribution on the Giuseppe Palmieri article. Very good (really my English is rather poor ...). Bbruno 21:12 CET, 10 March 2009. Note: if you like, please have a look to the article about the painter Giuseppe Badaracco that I have also expanded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbruno (talk • contribs) 20:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you again
Thanks again for your contribution on the Giuseppe Badaracco article. Very good. Bbruno 18:30 CET, 25 March 2009. —Preceding undated comment added 17:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of Giovanni Durante


The article Giovanni Durante has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The name Giovanni Durante seems to be a Wikipedia invention. Most of the info given is valid for Giovanni Alberti, except for his, his father's name, ... Better to delete such confusing and plainly incorrect info instead of leaving it in the history.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 12:17, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniello Basselli


The article Daniello Basselli has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "There is no way this guy passes WP:GNG, or WP:NARTIST. I've checked every one of the 'Directory of Engravers' 'Directory of Artists' etc books that he is mentioned in, and not a one has an entry longer than three sentences. Furthermore, they're all sourced to/close paraphrases of Strutt's Dictionary of Engravers, so they're barely independent sources. There's no info about his life or death, no indication he ever produced more than the one single engraving that Strutt remarked on, and basically no reason to believe this person ever impacted the art world in any notable or encyclopedic way."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:35, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Franco Tramazzino


A tag has been placed on Franco Tramazzino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Dr Strauss   talk   22:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Franco Tramazzino


The article Franco Tramazzino has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NARTIST."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Dr Strauss   talk   15:14, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

"Parque de María Luisa (park)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Parque de María Luisa (park). Since you had some involvement with the Parque de María Luisa (park) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc (talk) 19:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

"Parque de María Luisa (park)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Parque de María Luisa (park). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 16:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Gabriele Caliari for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriele Caliari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gabriele Caliari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)