User talk:Baseball Watcher/Archive 5

The Signpost: 9 May 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Revert
WOW. You guys are so fast! I am amazed at how fast you reverted me. It was like almost instant. By the way, can you please rvert the small vandalism I did on the page "Prime Minister of AUstralia". IO added a few letters in random places. Good job! 174.7.19.170 (talk) 03:02, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

A series of 0s and 1s have been sent via electrical signals and radio waves, to a remote server identified as "Gmail", which has directed the information to your share of the server.
It's so fun when someone asks for a descriptive title.

-- Σ ☭ ★  02:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Jennifer LeRoy AFD
I do not think the non-admin closing here was appropriate. The AFD (indeed, the entire set of related AFDs) was certainly controversial and contested, and similar discussions were admin-closed as redirects. Only one of the many other discussions in the set appears to have been closed as "no consensus" so far, with a more detailed closing statement. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:22, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

RfPP
Please don't flood RfPP with requests for PC removal. Technically, they should be taken up with the admin who added it, but I believe there are at least two admins actively removing it from articles where there would be no detriment in removing it. Unless there's some reason that specific articles really need to be protected or unprotected, there's no rush. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   23:40, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * My bad. :( Baseball   Watcher  00:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Fair Dinkum Histories
About your relist at Articles for deletion/Fair Dinkum Histories - it would have been more appropriate to just do a no consensus close with WP:NPASR implied or explicitly stated. The relisting policy states that "debates should not be relisted more than twice" without an accompanying rationale for relisting, and even then that would be rare. Just a pointer for the future. Thanks! Logan Talk Contributions 01:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I have closed the discussion as such. Logan Talk Contributions 01:01, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for telling me. I didn't know that! Baseball   Watcher  01:02, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! Thanks for helping out at AfD.  It's really appreciated. Logan Talk Contributions 01:11, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure thing! Face-grin.svg Baseball   Watcher  01:13, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

non admin closure

 * - Please stop closing these PLayboy AFD they are not available for non admin closure they all all contentious - Please read WP:NAC - Off2riorob (talk) 00:11, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:26, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

ANI mention
You have been directly or indirectly mentioned on this ANI thread. --Damiens .rf 14:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:46, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Help!
Kindly help please? The author of this page keeps removing the speedy tags. Kindly please help me alerting an Administrator about this matter. Thanks! JohnHWiki (talk) 01:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help! :) JohnHWiki (talk) 01:41, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Ma'ale HaShalom (2nd nomination)
I don't suppose it will come as any great surprise to you that I strongly disagree with your decision to close this as a keeper. If you go by counting heads, yes a majority said keep. If you go by logic, reason, and Wikipedia policy I think it's fairly clear that this article utterly fails some of our most basic requirements, specifically WP:V. Any chance of reconsidering? Beeblebrox (talk) 22:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Wait, actually you can't reconsider since you are not an admin. Please re-open the AFD and allow someone who is able to close it with a different result make the determination. NAC closes are for obvious cases only. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:04, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like while I was writing that you reversed the close. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:05, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Extra Credit cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Extra Credit cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:18, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 May 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Swamp Thing Set
This AFD has been open for 23 days, relisted twice (most recently 6 days ago). Can we get it closed? Several have already been merged and redirected. The rest remain unreferenced with only assurances that references must exist somewhere. --RadioFan (talk) 21:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Hey BW
I just notice you created a log. If you want all your CSD's and PROD's to be logged put the following script in your javascript page: importScript('User:Timotheus Canens/twinklespeedy.js'); //TW CSD script, customized to log all CSD noms. importScript('User:Timotheus Canens/twinkleprod.js'); //TW PROD script, customized to log PRODs and endorsements.  [[User:MauchoEagle| maucho eagle   ( c ) 23:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I just wanted to create it for User:Ale jrb/Scripts/csdhelper.js. Baseball   Watcher  23:16, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:16, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 May 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 19:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Lennert van Dessel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lennert van Dessel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lennert van Dessel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. andy (talk) 22:32, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Re: Carmen Kurtz
Thanks for the info, Baseball Watcher - I tried a few stubs and found they didn't exist - stubs for author, writer, etc, so went with a generic until I could figure out what exactly to categorise it under :) Cheers for the help though, I welcome it :)  Fish Barking?  23:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. Baseball   Watcher  23:40, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

W/regard your proposed speedy of VPL article
I believe vpl should not be covered on Wikipedia and look forward to disputing this issue with you.--Hodgson-Burnett&#39;s Secret Garden (talk) 23:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ? Baseball   Watcher  23:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Visible penis line, akin the the slang term visible panty line, IMO is only strange sounding when its various euphemisms are used (which are too numerous to mention), whereas an encyclopedia ought to be as straightforward as possible about whatever is the most accepted expression for whatever the phenonemon being addressed, IMHO anyway. Cheers.--Hodgson-Burnett&#39;s Secret Garden (talk) 23:54, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Stress Adventure
I closed this, Barnes and Noble confirmed it is a book set for release in November. C T J F 8 3 00:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I have relisted the debate at Articles for deletion/Diary of a Wimpy Kid (book 6) with a different rationale. Your comments are welcome. Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
This is the only warning you will receive. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add unsourced negative or controversial biographical material, as you did with this edit to Gordon Ramsay. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry! Dunno how THAT happened. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:43, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the tip on my talk page.-- CrossTempleJay   →  talk 12:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Re Template:NFL player
I am doing it per a request, and am I that obvious? -- The Σ talkcontribs 01:54, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "am I that obvious?"? Baseball   Watcher  01:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Is it that obvious referring to my template replacing. -- The Σ talkcontribs 02:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You were on recent changes a lot. Baseball   Watcher  02:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * And BTW do you need any help? I got nothing to do. Baseball   Watcher  02:09, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, just use (and make sure you supervise) Pywikibot. -- The Σ talkcontribs 02:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * And overusing it might mess up SuggestBot when it gets to you, so... -- The Σ talkcontribs 02:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Kinsler
Hi ... as to Kinsler, wouldn't that be "paternity" leave? Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:46, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

fixing
Hi, I fixed your accepted redirects at Articles for creation/Redirects. Please use the next time the correct templates. (It is all explained at the edit-notice of the page how to use it!) mabdul 09:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Articles for Creation
Thank you for your recent work in Articles for Creation. I would like to formally welcome you to the project, I am glad you have joined. Best, Alpha Quadrant    talk    14:34, 10 June 2011 (UTC) Hi, and welcome to WikiProject Articles for creation! We are a group of editors who work together on the Articles for creation and Images for upload pages.

A few tips that you might find helpful:
 * Please take time to fully read the reviewers' instructions before reviewing submissions.
 * The project's discussion board is the best place to ask for help or advice. You might like to watchlist this page, and you are encouraged to take part in any discussion that comes up.

Once again, welcome to the project. Alpha Quadrant   talk    14:34, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Article submissions that need reviewing can be found in Category:Pending AfC submissions and there is also a useful list which is maintained by a bot.
 * You might wish to add AFC status to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. There is also a project userbox. If you haven't done so already, please consider adding your name to the list of participants.
 * Several of our members monitor the IRC channel, and you are welcome to join in.
 * The IRC channel is used occasionally for internal discussion regarding the Articles for Creation process, and also serves as a recent changes feed, displaying all edits made in the Articles for Creation namespace.

User:Baseball Watcher/log
I deleted the page per your request, but noticed that the following two entries were added after the csd tag, so here they are in case you want to add them to the new page. —DoRD (talk) 16:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC) # Www.sohanlega.com: CSD A7 (db-a7); notified 15:35, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * David Eppel: CSD A7 (db-band); notified 15:40, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * . Baseball   Watcher  16:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:29, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision deletion
Can an admin delete this revision? Baseball  Watcher  18:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅&mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  18:48, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

This one too? Baseball   Watcher  15:20, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * No one can see that diff except admins right now...so nothing to do. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  15:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ...that's because I've just ✅ it. JohnCD (talk) 15:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Here and here Baseball   Watcher  20:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * IP has been blocked, IMO those aren't bad enough to need revdel. JohnCD (talk) 21:10, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Task force WP:RFA2011 update
Hi. As of 20 June: More stats have been added on candidates and !voter participation. Details have been added about qualifications required on other Wikis for candidates and RfA !voters. Some items such as clerking, !voters, and candidates are nearing proposal stage. A quick page`link template has been added to each page of the project. Please visit those links to get up to speed with recent developments, and chime in with your comments. Thanks for your participation.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 08:28, 20 June 2011 (UTC).

The Signpost: 20 June 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 14:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Stub sorting
Thanks for the notice!

Typically I start with because I do not remember all of the filenames of the various stub types. Sometimes, when I do know the filename, I will mark it with that type of stub. WhisperToMe (talk) 17:54, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your input, what did you find particualrly confusing
about Richard Granger? I'm writing it, and have some way to go, and have one chap demanding deletion, twice, and you being confused. But nobody else adding anything. Midgley (talk) 21:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The way it was written. I'll be happy to fix it though. Baseball   Watcher  18:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead people
I notice on a recent edit to Franz Krieger, you added both and. This is both unnecessary – is a subcategory of, so there is no need to add both tags – and incorrect –  is a container category and should not contain any articles directly. The correct thing would have been to add only. —Paul A (talk) 03:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Your input is requested
Greetings!

As a member of the RfA improvement task force, your input is requested at the possible proposals page, which consists of ideas that have not yet been discussed or developed.

Please look though the ideas and leave a comment on the talk page on the proposal(s) you would most like to see go forward. Your feedback will help decide which proposals to put to the community. And, as always, feel free to add new suggestions. Thanks!

Swarm, coordinator, RfA reform 2011

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 07:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC).

PVC Pipe Association Page Removal
Dear Baseball Watcher,

I am writing to you in response to the comment that the article that I posted (PVC Pipe Association) was copyright infringement. I have tried two different version, neither of which use the same wording that is contained on the Uni-Bell website. (www.uni-bell.org), though I have been told twice that I am violating copyright. I received the following message from you...

''This article appears to be taken from http://www.uni-bell.org/about.html. We cannot accept copyrighted content taken from web sites or printed sources. Note that copyright protection is granted to all works automatically, whether it is asserted or not. Unless stated otherwise, assume that most content on the internet is copyrighted and not suitable for Wikipedia. Please write in your own words, and in continuous prose.''

What can I post about the PVC Pipe Association? I use the website as a source, because it is the best place to refer someone to if they want more information.

Thanks,

AlysonBartosh (talk) 14:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

WP:RFA2011: RfA on other Wikipedias
A detailed table and notes have now been created and posted. It compares how RfA is carried out on   major Wikipedias (English, French, German, Italian, Spanish). If you feel  that other important language  Wikipedias should be added, please let  us know. This may however depend on  our/your language skills!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of RfA reform 2011 at 22:49, 3 July 2011 (UTC).

The Signpost: 4 July 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 10:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Adam Weiner
Hey, noticed you had a bit of trouble at the Adam Weiner page. Name begs for vandalism really doesn't it! Anyway I identified a vandal edit which has been active since March, of course it has now been reverted. Cheers -- Cloudz679 (talk) 21:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry - gone to bed
And had a very long day. What the heck is it and why should it be deleted? Never seen one of them before... Peridon (talk) 17:11, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * See WP:RD2 and WP:Revision deletion. Baseball   Watcher  19:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Confuzzled. No, I know about those. What I got (and get) from the page your link goes to was/is a title "Permissions errors", and the text

"You do not have permission to do that, for the following reason:

There seems to be a problem with your login session; this action has been cancelled as a precaution against session hijacking. Go back to the previous page, reload that page and then try again."

And I hadn't even tried to do anything... That's what I'd never seen before. When I go into the history, I can get to the page, which seems to be very busy and I can't work out without examining every edit what's amiss. It's been a hard week (two weeks - I learned more about MS Word 2003 last week than I really want to know...). Sorry I'm not being of much help. Peridon (talk) 18:49, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Please Respond....
Hi,

I wrote you a message on your talk page last week and have been checking every day to see if you had responded and now I see that it has been deleted. I thought this was the place to kindly ask you why you had deleted information we had entered...

Can you please respond to this and tell me why my article, PVC Pipe Association was deleted in the first place? It was as nuetral as physically possible.

AlysonBartosh (talk) 17:21, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 July 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

number
I saw you have 6276th place for most edits (7575). Good job! Probably went up by the time you read this. Here:  A   user who has been editing Wikipedia since Thursday, October 28, 2010.  21:49, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 July 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:15, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:21, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 August 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

RfA edits
Hi Baseball Watcher. What's up with these edits? As best I can tell, this RfA was never transcluded. 28bytes (talk) 17:02, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 August 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:55, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:46, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 08:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

whats the point
of editing pages and leaving external links if you just edit it and give warnings, this is why wiki has a bad name ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.16.126.133 (talk) 22:19, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Billy Blackard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Billy Blackard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Billy Blackard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  00:57, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

BLP Prodding
Hi, You might want to have a quick refresher at BLPPROD. Although I'd agree they are not well sourced, the last couple or three articles you have BLP'd do at least have external links... cheers.-- Club Oranje T 04:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 August 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:33, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Curtis Clay for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Curtis Clay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Curtis Clay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  18:12, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2011
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 07:40, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Pepa Letuli for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pepa Letuli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pepa Letuli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  04:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC)