User talk:Bcostley

Nehalem River
That picture said it was of the Nehalem. Why did you remove the image? Jsayre64  (talk)  23:31, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Because is it not a picture of the Nehalem. It is a picture of Rock Creek, a tributary to the Nehalem. Bcostley (talk) at 22:36, 14 July 20 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm SecretName101. Your recent edit to the page Concordia College and University appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=622830505 here]. SecretName101 (talk) 02:35, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Please read the source
https://books.google.ca/books?id=OIgTE4aynrMC&pg=PA828#v=onepage&q&f=false Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 01:50, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

1) The source above was not cited to the sentence in question. 2) This source does not back the sentence in question. It specifically says this class of drugs should be contraindicated during pregnancy. 3) The "Pregnancy and Breastfeeding" section in the article is sourced and contradicts the sentence you reverted. The FDA considers it a pregnancy class C and the US label indicates that it should not be used while breastfeeding. Bcostley (talk) 00:06, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes good point. Have adjusted the content in question to "While use during pregnancy is not recommended risk appears to be low.[4] The use of other medications in the class appear okay in breastfeeding; however, the safety of levofloxacin is unclear.[4]" Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 00:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. The latest revision appears satisfactory. Bcostley (talk) 00:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Edit war warning
Your recent editing history at Levofloxacin‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Jytdog (talk) 00:11, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Jytdog they make a good point. Have adjusted the text in question to better match the source. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 00:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)