User talk:Bear300

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 22:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.  C T J F 8 3 Talk 20:15, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  C T J F 8 3 Talk 07:36, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. BMRR (talk) 05:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Roger Ebert
Hi. Thanks for adding some material to the Roger Ebert article. However, I read through the source you provided for Ebert's influence on Richard Corliss, and could not find any mention of this. Can you tell me which page of that article it's on, or quote the passage in question that establishes this? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Bill Maher and Don Imus
Hi -- do you have a source that states that Don Imus is one of Maher's influences or are you just assuming it? You can answer here. Thanks! &#8756; Therefore cogito·sum 23:53, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Stephen King
Hi. Please do not add unsourced material or original research to articles, as you did with this edit to Stephen, as this violates Wikipedia's policies of No Original Research and Verifiability. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 23:33, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Hunter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  16:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lyra-Belacqua.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Lyra-Belacqua.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:59, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)