User talk:Bearian/ArchivesJulyToMidAugust2007

This is an archive of a user's page. Please do not edit this page! See User:Bearian for the user's main page and User talk:Bearian for the user's current discussion page. Bearian 18:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Could you clarify?
You added the {expert|XML} tag to the TPoX page. I searched the wikipedia help to find out exactly what action is required but found no detailed guidance. I made a few changes. Could you elaborate on your concerns and how it should be addressed? What's the meaning of the "|XML" in the tag? Thanks! --Tpox 07:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Re:Thanks
You're welcome. In the future, you don't need to thank me unless I need to look back at the article and review it. But I sincerely appreciate your comments. Best regards. Shalom Hello 19:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Can you help me?
Dear Bearian:

Can you help me?, I do not dominate the English, am Spanish… For that reason the text about Werner Wickboldt is not correct…

You can - or any other Wikipedist - help in the correction of the text?

About the sources, I do not know others in English, I'm sorry…

Kind Regards, --Georgeos Díaz-Montexano 04:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Bearian, for so amiable welcome…

I am going to need much your aid; although I am not going to never abuse the confidence…

Kind Regards --Georgeos Díaz-Montexano 12:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Merger of Geosynchronous orbit and Geostationary orbit

 * ''In reply to your message on my talk page.

It seems there is no longer consensus to implement this. --GW_SimulationsUser Page 23:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Re
hey there

thanks for your note on my talk page

as of now, there is no consensus to merge those missions. as this merger has been pending for quite some time now (aug06 if im not mistaken), i'm looking forward to seeing this matter closed once and for all. as far as i can see, one page deals with the mission in the 8th century that is (generally?) considered the extension/continuation of the original work started around the 6th. so to me, it seems logical to merge the two - keeps the content within context, adds information to the main article and provides a logical continuation to the original article as to how their initial missionary work was carried on later. seems straightforward.

but im no expert on the subject, im looking at it purely from an outside editor's point of view.

you've been helping out with WP:PM, have you? Nice to see some more hands at work there :)

xC | ☎ 11:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified claim
The article as it is now is very good. But I only sorted the stub, so no need to thank me. :) Sophy&#39;s Duckling

An essay you might be interested in...
...is located here. The Evil Spartan 14:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * responded to your message. The Evil Spartan 15:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:AR1
It's fun! I learn a lot about music I never knew existed. However, my ability to write articles on the stuff that's left in the music bin is starting to dry up. Some of those things are notable but I can't prove it. Chubbles 00:52, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Claim (patent)
You're welcome! By the way, thanks for creating the section! Cheers --Edcolins 07:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

SUNY New Paltz COI
Hey Bearian - good idea on addressing the SUNY New Paltz issue on WP:COIN. You may not realize this, but nearly all the major actors in the article are COI. I suspect that most articles of this type have this problem. I suggest that we rededicate our efforts to sourcing information - most of the controversial information is still unsourced, including material which I have added and edited. Let's pick apart the controversial claims and make sure each one is well sourced.

Are we not going to be able to come to an agreement on the nomenclature for the website?

What is your take on the founding date? It seems to me that both views of the founding date should be presented, although I don't think that listing 1828 as a founding date can be justified as factual and backed up by reputable sources. RadicalHarmony 18:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Articles for deletion/Sega Blazengi
Glad you enjoyed it :) Tualha (Talk) 22:57, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

community
Hi Bearian, thanks for your comment. I really don't know that I dealt with anything. Showing good faith is as important as assuming it. It actually works, even when there isn't any intent to improve things. I don't know what that user's motivation was, but others should not see this as a place for a war. Anyway, regards from the antipodes, Fred ☻  00:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Filomena Hanas
''I asked on the AfD for this article: "Are User:Zd123as, User:83.27.31.131, and User:Russian Pop connected in any way, or is it just a coincidence?" Bearian 02:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)''
 * They're most likely the same person, although I don't recall shit, that sounds like Alberto Gonzales I don't remember seeing so much edits by Russian Pop before. The IP points to Wroclaw though, which is hundreds of miles from the region described in these articles FWIW. I had a look at the edits and they focus mostly on adding diacritics and trying to decide which musical instrument's name sounds funnier (at least, to someone who speaks Polish). --Targeman 02:53, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

AFD
It never ceases to amaze me as to what one can learn from reading AFDs, WP:HOLE, for example. I could have put it to use here *. :D Thanks! —Travis talk 03:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC)  *The supposed mayor of a seemingly nonexistent town


 * Thanks for your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of street gangs. Bearian 01:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * My pleasure :-) --Targeman 01:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


 * You are going to purgatory for this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippians 4:13. Bearian 16:28, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Nah, a couple of Hail Marys and a donation and I'm off the hook ;-) --Targeman 16:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Possible sockpuppets
Hi! User:Rdpaperclip, User:T3Smile and User:Achidiac do appear to have very similar editing interests. If the AfD should turn up keep, WP:RFCU is certainly in order. CU can't be done before the vote is closed though. Weregerbil 04:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * FYI: T3Smile confirmed as IP 60.241.91.14. —Travis talk 21:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and I also addressed it on your talk page. Thank you for confirming my instincts. Bearian 01:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Brazil
Thank you for the vote. Felipe C.S ( talk ) 19:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Law practice management software
Hi, I think you've done a great job expanding it. I guess next we could focus on typical software issues like pricing/advertising, training, compatibility, specific notable features, maybe a link to the federal PACER system... There's also all the stuff I keep reading about electronic discovery but I don't know if that should be a separate topic or not. I suppose for now it's OK, my major concern was saving it from AfD. Wl219 09:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Deletion Review: Pataphor
I hope you'll leave your opinion on the matter, if you think it should remain. Thanks, jchristie7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_22

Deletion: Christian Wrestling Federation
I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for the CWF to be deleted from Wikipedia. There were other links to other sources but they seemed to be continually removed. There are also references to the CWF on other Wikipedia pages. Can you clarify for me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdblundell (talk • contribs)
 * Cheers for the long response, I have had a day of two vandals abusing my user page and user talk page and I couldn't be bothered with a long reply. Darrenhusted 01:26, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * And thanks from me to. Excellent way not to bite ... he's barely gotten a hundred edits or so and, like so many of us at that stage, has a lot to learn. Daniel Case 01:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

"Response to your questions about this AfD"
...Man, did you deal with this, or did you deal with this! Well done Bearian. --SteelersFan UK06 01:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarifications Bearian it was a much better picture and explanation than I could gather elsewhere.

Taj tashombe etc.
If an article is obviously a misplaced userpage, it's ok to userfy it. As stated in the userfication guidelines, it's preferable to move the article to the empty userpage using the Move tab, and then tag for deletion the redirect that will be left at the article title. Thanks for your help! NawlinWiki 18:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Your revert of vandalism to my user page
I don't mind at all, thank you. This is the first time the honey-roasted peanut boys have paid me a personal visit. The admins haven't been able to do much about them yet. --CliffC 03:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
Sorry, but I can't block the IP adress 206.213.251.31, as I am not an administrator either. Was there a particular reason that you left this message with me? -- Boy1jhn 17:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I didn't realise I'd warned them before. Perhaps one of us should report the user at WP:AIV. -- Boy1jhn 18:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

manticore
your guess is as good as mine. Novium 18:50, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello
You mentioned that you saw my username on a coaching list and would support me in an RfA. Ironically, my RfA ended this morning and ended in no consensus. 30 supports, 14 opposes. I will be again submitting an RfA in early September and I would appreciate your input. Thanks. Useight 01:52, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Albacon
Thank you for noticing!:)Jlittlet 18:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Ultimate Fact
Sorry, I'm borderline obsessive-compulsive on uncapitalized articles. =D Once again, sorry.Spartytime 17:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Donal Lang
I should have thought of that, thanks, Jimfbleak 05:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

RE: Your comment on my talk page.
Thanks for the feedback on my question regarding speedy deletion of AFD items. --Aarktica 13:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Terror management theory
Thanks! I'm glad I could help. All the best --Bláthnaid 14:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Canadian AfDs
Why not? The whole point of AfD is to discuss the articles, and to determine their merits. There are a lot of articles on useless people that need to be discussed. GreenJoe 15:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure it is. There are many articles where the merits to keep or delete aren't very clear cut, so we are provided with this medium to communicate and come to a consensus on what the community would like to do. The reality is that it's only a very small fraction of the community that participates in these discussions. GreenJoe 16:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note to self: see WP:POINT. Bearian 18:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the Barnstar but....
was the reason insulting? I honestly don't know what you mean't by that last part....Zidel333 22:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh good, I feel better. Thank you again. :D Zidel333 02:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

RfC
Quite right, thank you. Actually, IMO the guy is gaming the system, but I think he's probably acting in good faith. He is right that wikipedia should be purged of inappropriate trivia, but it seems he and his friends are immediate-ists, when the right approach is to give the matter considered thought, to review these types of articles with TLC and to extract from them the items that do have merit, and with what's left to consider whether a transwiki is a better option than outright deletion from the world wide web.

The greatest weakness of wikipedia is the lack of respect that some members of the community have for the hard work of others, and an inability to see - or even to seek - the diamonds in the rough.

Also, see the talk message I'll add to DGG's talk page in a few minutes. AndyJones 17:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Re:AfD
Thanks. I'm not as active as I would've liked lately, since it's summer, at least in my hemisphere, but I try to keep on here. Happy editing, Cool  Blue talk to me 16:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Elonka 2
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project, and I'll try again in a few months! If you ever have any questions or suggestions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best wishes, --Elonka 02:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

CDTA article
The retired fleet can be cleaned up. I was not the contributor who initially placed that in the article. --AEMoreira042281 01:13, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Are you ready for RFA?
 Shalom would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Shalom to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

I think your chances of passing RFA are excellent. I see from your talk page that a lot of users (myself included) already think of you as an administrator, even though technically this is not the case. You have done excellent work at WP:COIN, WP:DEAD, and WP:AR1. Shalom Hello 02:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I checked User talk:Eyrian and saw that whatever the dispute was, it never became a big problem, and everyone seems to have moved on. Perhaps wait a week or two so that you will be available to answer optional questions at the RFA if you are busy this week.  There is no deadline.  However, most users will judge you by your overall record, and you've already established the credentials needed to pass an RFA with room to spare.


 * Please leave me a message when you are ready to go ahead. Also leave a note at User talk:Husond because he has (quietly) expressed an interest in nominating you. Shalom Hello 22:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

New interesting WP-space page
the useful summary page :  now has a new and useful complement  --be aware it takes a while to load. DGG (talk) 02:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

High schools

 * Hi there. I approve of your standards for notability for high schools. Henceforth, I will use that standard "RJHall Test" at WP:AFD. Bearian 21:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I was hoping against hope that a consensus policy could be reached, but opinions on the matter seem to have hardened. &mdash; RJH (talk) 15:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Re. RFA
Hello Bearian. Shalom was right, I did quietly express interest in nominating you in the future by adding you to my RFA subpage recently. However, I still have some minor reservations before offering to nominate such as: 1) despite great involvement in AfD, I usually prefer that candidates have some vandalfight experience as well; 2) your talk page has never been archived, hinting at rather low communication with other users. Admin candidates are expected to have interacted with other users more frequently, and subsequently have archived their talk pages for their size. Some users may thus say that you need more interaction before supporting your candidacy. Anyway these are just minor reservations and I expect that an RfA at this time will be successful. Still, I would recommend some more time before it. I'd be willing to nominate you then. Best regards, Hús  ö  nd  17:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Limetolime
Oops, my typo :) Giggy  Talk 02:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

wp:ar1
Aaaah, so would that be any administrator or someone in particular?I guess they dont do it so there is heaps of articles in the AR2 so as to not turn it into a backlog (as in once they go to AR2 they will more or less be created, but with heaps of them there, it will take just as long as any other request page....Thanks for the info :).petze 06:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Request

 * excusme I has a little problem with software,would you like give me your email address?Davnel03 16:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Hrothgar = George?
G'day! I'm sorry to say that I don't know exactly what you were asking- as far as the name itself, I have no idea. If by "check this user", you meant actually use CheckUser, I'm not an admin, so I can't do a CheckUser. With that said, it's not such a big deal- the article was unanimously deleted- so I certainly wouldn't worry about it. -- Kicking222 13:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Grieg
Ought to hold., at least at this Afd. Expect continuing discussions on all the kept ones, and I hope improvement and use of the better material for good new articles for the deleted. When they get rewritten and retitled, I consider they can just be added as new articles. I must tell you, though, that I simply do not have time in the RW to do much rewriting. And as an admin, I'm too involved to protect. But I intend to stay aware at various appropriate projects; the best way of dealing with one-sided ones is for others to join; I'm a member of several on both the deletionist and inclusionist sides. DGG (talk) 20:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Grieg
It looks much better but there're still some weasel words (such as "seems to"). Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Vistas High School
The article has been renamed correctly as Vistas High School Program. There is a discussion on a possible merge to its parent article at Klein ISD Merge. Your input is welcome. – Dreadstar †  22:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, thanks for you note, I completely understand. I was being fair, and avoiding WP:CANVASS at the same time by notifying everyone of the AfD and not just a limited set. Appreciate your vote!  – Dreadstar  †  22:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Grieg's music in popular culture
I think that you should be the one receiving credit: The consensus was solidly for deletion before your rewrite, and solidly for retention afterward. It's a prime example of why Wikipedia works on consensus-building discussions rather than simple polling. — TKD::Talk 02:01, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Grieg redux
I second TKD's comments. And even those who often find themselves sympathetic to the arguments of deleting these pop culture can be shown in the right circumstances that the arguments can be overcome. You will find that few editors are inflexible in this regard. Carlossuarez46 02:13, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism to my userpage
- Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. Bearian 02:01, 12 August 2007 (UTC) -   - :No problem. :) Gscshoyru 02:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

NYC
I'll be there. I see you will be also. DGG (talk) 08:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment
Thank you for your comment on my RfA, which was successful. LyrlTalk C 00:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Ciaran O' Connell AfD
In response to your query at User talk:Irishguy, I just restored the AfD notice by copying it from an older version of the page and pasting back in the current version. Flyguy649 talk contribs 16:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem! Flyguy649 talk contribs 17:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Request for Help
Err, excuse me, I have never requested for help, so why have I recieved that message from you? Davnel03 17:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, someones impersonating me.... Davnel03 17:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I've reported the IP to ANI Davnel03 17:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Much thanks. Bearian 18:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: User:Mattbroon
I don't have any way to confirm that a user is a sockpuppet of another. If every incarnation of this editor goes and causes obvious problems like Matt did, it's not a big deal as they'll all manage to get themselves blocked. However, if you think there's still a non-blocked user out there controlled by the same individual, you may want to file a report at Requests for checkuser to see whether they can be shown to be the same guy. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:57, 15 August