User talk:Beevil

National Centre for Atmospheric Science
I have removed part of your addition to the above article, as it appears to have been copied directly from https://ncas.ac.uk/index.php/en/about-ncas/16-corporate-content, a copyright web page. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I may have made a mistake. — Diannaa (talk) 18:58, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Create and Craft Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Create and Craft Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Loch Lomond distillery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arrochar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Megavoltage X-rays, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Van de Graff. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm Iridescent. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Varian Medical Systems— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &#8209; Iridescent 11:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * My apologies, I could have sworn when I looked at the revision I undid, it was adding the "Kun in Winnipeg" line, sorry for the error Beevil (talk) 11:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Queens Park Rangers Crest 2016.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Queens Park Rangers Crest 2016.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cath lab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unsealed source radiotherapy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Non-free image use
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Template:Country data African Union, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Technetium (99mTc) sestamibi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sensitivity ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Technetium_%2899mTc%29_sestamibi check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Technetium_%2899mTc%29_sestamibi?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Myocardial perfusion imaging, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Effective dose ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Myocardial_perfusion_imaging check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Myocardial_perfusion_imaging?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Re: OP wiki page
Hi Beevil:

My name is Grant Palermo, the Chief Executive Officer of Olivia Palermo's company.

With respect to the changes that we have made over the past few days, those have been on behalf of Ms. Palermo and at her request. I would kindly ask you to please not reverting those changes as we are trying to clean up the Wiki page. The Wiki page has inaccurate facts and therefore we are trying to rectify them accordingly.

Kind regards, Grant Palermo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmogroup (talk • contribs) 22:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Grant,
 * I'm afraid if you are who you say you are, you have a conflict of interest and are acting as a paid editor. You will need to disclose that on your user page, and on the talk pages of any articles you have edited (e.g. Talk:Olivia Palermo). It is strongly suggested that you do not edit articles directly and instead request edits you would like to see made, on the talk page, as described in the above links. I have also left a message on your talk page with some relevant links. If your username represents your organisation, it should also be changed, as usernames are supposed to be for individuals, see here. Hope this and the links on your talk page are helpful. Beevil (talk) 10:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ionising Radiations Regulations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Effective dose ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ionising_Radiations_Regulations check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ionising_Radiations_Regulations?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NHS Professionals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/NHS_Professionals check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/NHS_Professionals?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

I believe the user, Richard Fleming, who was (at least) temporarily banned from Sestamibi page is editing again under different name.
Hi - I am not terribly familiar with Wikipedia etiquette, but as you appear to have recently edited the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technetium_(99mTc)_sestamibi I thought you might be interested in these comments.

A while ago (and I think you were involved then too), an individual, Dr. Richard Fleming, was blocked from editing this page on a nuclear medicine (sestamibi) as he repeatedly attempted to insert some self-promotion material and violated some Wikipedia standards. I think he may have been permanently banned after trying to still edit this page while logged off. Not sure how that all works. The old user page and some of this history can be read at the Sestamibi link above or at his old user page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RM_Fleming,_MD

I kind of keep an eye on his internet activity and saw today that he appears to have added some material to a different page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_analysis_techniques_for_fraud_detection) and came to take a look. I believe Dr. Fleming is now using a different username, Juleslav (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Juleslav). His material on that other page, has similar problems that were dealt with in April(?) on the sestamibi page. At its root it is self-promotion (Dr. Fleming has published a paper in a low quality (aka "predatory") journal that he is linking to), and the other material are related to a court case where he plead guilty to felony fraud for faking a clinical trial. He has attempted to "relitigate" the arguments he made during multiple legal cases, all of which I believe he lost. All this background is covered succinctly here:https://retractionwatch.com/2018/11/13/a-convicted-felon-writes-a-paper-on-hotly-debated-diets-what-could-go-wrong/ I don't know how to prove to Wikipedia's standards that Juleslav is Dr. Fleming (or a close associate) other than I can't think of anyone else who would be promoting Dr. Fleming's views.

From what I understood from his previous efforts, I believe his editing of the "data analysis" page violates the Wikipedia COI guidelines and perhaps his new edits on the sestamibi page do too. I sent a note similar to this one to an editor at the "data analysis" page.

Anyway, I just thought an editor might want to take a look at what he's up to now to see if it meets your standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatsRegrettable (talk • contribs) 03:54, 7 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for letting me know! I'm not particularly up to speed with the right wikipedia policies/actions myself. I think the best way to get someone more knowledgable, and with the appropriate tools to verify if this is the same user, is to report them as a suspected sockpuppet. I'd suggest you file the report as you've identified this new account. The process is fairly well explained here Sockpuppet_investigations, but I used WP:Twinkle to slightly automate the process! Let me know if you'd rather not Beevil (talk) 10:29, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I have attempted to report this as you suggested. FYI - I didn't see the Twinkle gadget on my preferences page, so I did it manually. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatsRegrettable (talk • contribs) 16:48, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British Medical Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medical Student ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/British_Medical_Association check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/British_Medical_Association?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EANM&#39;s Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:EANM&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposing help for industrial x-ray inspection
Hi!

I noticed that you are very often editing pages about industrial x-ray inspection and medical physics. One funny thing is that I actually had to reference your image work multiple times in my master's thesis XD.

Anyway I wanted to see with you if you needed help with a bit of editing on the more industrial part of things and/or general applied radiation stuff.

If you're interested we could share a list of the most pressing issues here and keep track of them over time.

Thank you for your work! -- A physicist friend -- Feynstein (talk) 04:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi and thanks! I'm no expert, particularly in the industrial side of things, and mostly just edit on a whim when I come across things I think I could improve. I'm happy to share stuff, but looking at your edits and background it seems like you're well set and doing good work already! Beevil (talk) 11:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your answer. I wrote this message when I was not familiar with Wikipedia editing and I think I was mostly looking for advice. I had time to experiment a bit now and I agree I'm set! It was a pleasure for me talking to you finally, as I said I referenced your work already. I would have preferred if it could have been with your real name, since it's going to Library and Archives Canada, but I'm not sure how we can do that privately here. If you can find a way, just tell me and I'll add it in the final version, my evaluation jury is late...So there's still time to slip it in if you want. Thanks again for your answer, and hope to talk to you soon. PhysiqueUL09 (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Great glad to hear it. I appreciate it but I'm happy it just being my username, I don't know which image it was but most of what I've uploaded has been revisions of other people's work anyway! Beevil (talk) 08:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:King&#39;s College London crest.png
Thanks for uploading File:King&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

PET-MRI
How does a chapter entitled: "Combined PET-MRI Scanner" (page 162 of the thesis) not demonstrate a mention of the combination of the two modalities in 1991? If you read the section you will see that it describes designs of PET-MRI similar to the ones first built. Why don't you want to give credit where it belongs to Mr. Raylmam? As I said before, we are a group of retired UofM faculty that monitor the web to be sure that former Michigan students/faculty receive deserved credit. This webpage is on our monitor list. As far as secondary references go, we have checked and virtually none of the other references on this page have secondary references. In fact, the ref. 2 is to a poorly written chapter in a book, not what one would call a scientific reference. Islesonfire (talk) 22:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Note that the comment has been changed that the concept of PET-MRI combination was mentioned in a 1991 thesis, not the first mention. Go Blue!15:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.182.105.1 (talk)
 * Hi, I have replied on the article talk page to keep my answers together, please reply there if you wish to. Beevil (talk) 20:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SNCF Class Z 26500, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bretagne.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Unfair treatment of specific users
It seems to unfair treatment of specific users

Hi!

@Beevil: Here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MariWriter) you wrote that jelvix.com is a blog that does not belong to reliable sources according to Wikipedia standards and deleted my edit to the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_business However, in the same article there is a link to a similar jelvix source. Here is this source - https://www.altexsoft.com/blog/business/using-business-model-canvas-to-launch-a-technology-startup-or-improve-established-operating-model/

Please explain to me why this source is authoritative? It is also a blog. It seems to me that this is an unfair attitude towards me. And I am a valuable contributor to the editing of Wikipedia. I appreciate if you explain to me this situation.
 * Hello. I haven't edited Electronic business, the page where I removed your reference to jelvix.com was remote patient monitoring.
 * You're right though that the link you've identified to altexsoft.com probably isn't a good source and doesn't fulfil wikipedia's requirements. Having said that though there are loads of articles on wikipedia, with loads of things that are wrong don't fit wikipedia's guidelines. We're all volunteers here contributing where we can so inevitably even if one thing is removed you can probably find plenty of other examples that aren't, but should be! There's a bit more about this here: WP:OTHERCONTENT.
 * Basically me removing something you've added, even though similar things exist on other pages, isn't because you're being personally targeted, it's just that I happened to see the edit you made as it was to a page I have in my watchlist and I happened to look at it. Beevil (talk) 19:17, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a survey about medical topics on Wikipedia
Dear fellow editor,

I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.

All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.

Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.

I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).

The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE.

Piotr Konieczny Associate Professor Hanyang University If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

COI tag on Photon-counting mammography
Hello Beevil, there is a COI tag on the page Photon-counting mammography stating that the references are unbalanced added by you. Thank you for checking that. I have updated the references -- added new ones and removed duplicates when appropriate. I am connected to the topic and I don't want to remove the COI tags myself. Can you review and advise if there are other changes needed to remove the COI tags? I have worked actively in the field of mammography but not since several years back and I don't have any financial ties. Thanks --Erik.Fredenberg (talk) 06:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Traidcraft Exchange logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Traidcraft Exchange logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Radiation therapy → Radiation oncology
in this article of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_therapy The first line is not Radiation therapy its Radiation Oncology is correct way 110.235.232.88 (talk) 08:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)


 * @110.235.232.88 @Roncology The name of the article is radiation therapy. This is the correct name, but if you want to propose a change you need to discuss it on the article talk page, in line with Requested moves/Controversial. Thanks, Beevil (talk) 09:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)