User talk:Benzocane

Global perspectives task force
Hi Benzocane! Thanks for making me aware of the task force you are planning to create. I think it is a great idea. In particular, I think the inclusion of non-U.S. media sources is particularly important to ensure that Wikipedia reflects a truly global perspective. Please let me know if and when the task force becomes official, and whether I can help with its establishment.--Mackabean 19:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi Benzocane. Thanks for informing on your newly planned project/task force. Also, thanks for your flattering words. Personally I think an actual project would be a good idea. Inform me on my talk page where you have listed the proposal and I will vote for it. I would also be willing to help set it up. If you are interested I know some wikipedians who would be able to help. --  Ra nd om   Say it here!  20:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I left a note on the CSB talk page. Cheers! Geo Swan 18:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
 WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive! WikiProject Biography is holding a three month long assessment drive! The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unassessed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2007 – September 1, 2007.

Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the WikiCookie to the great Golden Wiki Award. There are over 110,000 articles to assess so please visit the drive's page and help out!

This drive was conceived of and organized by Psychless with the help of Ozgod. Regards, Psych less Type words! .

Another task force
Hi Benzocane! I like your idea of a task force dedicated to organizing environmental information within entries. For example, I have been surprised at how little information there is on the environmental records (both negative and positive) of major corporations. I would definitely support the creation of a task force within the WikiProject Environment to address that gap. Perhaps you should make a note on the talk page of that project and see how other editors react? In the meantime I will try to think of other Wikipedians who might be interested. Thanks for reaching out to me on this. I think it is a good idea. :) --Mackabean 02:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi Benzocane! I am very pleased that you reached out to me and gave me this opportunity. I am very eager to lend a hand and to help create this new task force. I am here and ready to help! :) Psdubow 01:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

DYK

 * Is this your first article to appear at Did you know ? Smee 08:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC).

DYK optional userboxen
If you wish, you can now utilize the userbox: , and the number can be adjusted to show number of created articles appeared on DYK, which looks a little something like:  User DYK, (plus the number inserted).

You can also utilize the user box User Did You Know, by inserting  on your userpage. Yours, Smee 19:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC).

Your invitation
Hi, thanks for your invites. I am afraid I may not be able to contribute much to this as my priorities are elsewhere at least for a good while. Shyamal 04:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Environmental-records task force
You wrote (on the Discussion page @ my User Page): "Hi, Joel! A few editors are getting together to create a task force with the goal of making sure environmental records of corporations and politicians are accurately and efficiently represented in relevant entries. Given your interests, I thought I'd bring your attention to this project. If you think it's a good idea, please consider chiming in on the discussion page. We hope to have a task force page up soon and of course would love to have you involved!"

I appreciate the invitation. I think you're looking into something pretty worthwhile. For example, Denis Hayes, a leader of the original Earth Day and an environmental lawyer, worked in the solar industry until, after the 1980 U.S. presidential election, Ronald Reagan took the federal support for the development of that industry. In my estimation, that was a big set-back. Of course, countless other unfortunate choices and policies have occured since then.

I'm not sure I'm in touch with a lot of the sort of info you want. I might be able to help generate some points and questions useful for probes. I'm primarily a "ways and means" person interested in the nuts & bolts of postive options — with respect to choices, lifestyles, community projects and institutions, etc. Joel Russ 20:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Environmental task force
Thanks for letting me know about it. I definitely think that Wikipedia has the potential to be a great resource on things like this and can have a great positive impact. I'm not sure how much I'll be able to participate since I won't be able to spend as much time on Wikipedia for at least the next couple months, but I'll definitely look into it and do what I can. Academic Challenger 20:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Seeking your advice
benzocane,

First let me say thanks for your exemplary contributions to the ERTF. Concise, informative, elegantly styled. Thanks in no small part to your help, the environmental record task force has made a strong start.

I write you today because I have been thinking about creating a new task force under the aegis of WikiProject Politics.

I'm still learning my way around WP, so yesterday I somewhat rashly (I was just trying to get my thoughts down on paper, so to speak) created a task force page--I think it expresses the basic idea well enough.

My question: I would like asap to propose this idea on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics page. Do you have any thoughts as to


 * improving the basic concept for the task force prior to said proposal


 * whether you or other editors might be interested in joining?

I'll watchlist your talk page, so please feel free to respond either here or on my own talk page.

Very best regards,

Cyrusc 21:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


 * thanks for your prompt and encouraging response. I will post the proposal right away.

Cyrusc 22:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Nuff said
cheers, Cyrusc 21:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Portal peer review
Thanks for helping out with the environment task force. I would like to ask you to do a portal peer review for Portal:Environment, a portal I started a few days ago. OhanaUnited Talk page  15:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Task Force Invitation
Thank you for your kind invitation to work with the Environmental Record Task Force. For the time being, at least, I have to decline. I'm in the middle of several demanding projects outside of Wikipedia. I do hope to start some articles on significant environmental organizations not presently covered; that will probably be my main area of concentration for environmental work in Wikipedia over the next few months. Dwalls 12:57, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Environmental Record vs. Environmental Criticism
Hi. Thanks for the note, but I respectfully disagree. I have restored "criticism" in order to make the article consistent with NPOV. The content of the section, at least at present, is specifically criticism, and should properly be identified as such. The label you propose puts a neutral spin on a specific point of view, and could lead a reader to conclude that it represents an overall picture of their environmental record, when there is no sourcing to indicate this is the case.

I was previously unfamiliar with the Environmental Record Task Force. It seems like a worthwhile effort, but also one vulnerable to a lapse into advocacy (see What Wikipedia is Not). If this is, indeed the terminology the task force is using in its other edits, they should perhaps also be reviewed, to ensure they do not inadvertently adopt a point of view.

Portal:Environment
Thanks for giving feedback during peer review for this portal. I have improved it and ready to take it to featured portal status. I would like to invite you to give some comments about this portal at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Environment OhanaUnited  Talk page  14:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5
To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC).

Neutrality Project
Hi, I'm trying to ensure that the Neutrality Project has not become inactive. If you would still like to participate in it, please re-add your name to the Review Team list. Jame§ugrono 08:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Margarita Prentice
Don't know if this is still on your talk list, but I made some edits (which have been reverted) and moved some content to the section you started a few months ago for discussion. Any comments? Flowanda | Talk 21:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Invitation
{| class="plainlinks"
 * colspan="3" valign="left" style="width: 100%; background:Navy; padding: 10px;" |

Introducing WikiProject United States Government...

 * valign="top" style="border: 2px Red solid; background: white; padding: 1em; width: 20%; " |[[Image:US-GreatSeal-Obverse.svg|200px]]
 * valign="top" style="border: 2px Red solid; background: white; padding: 1em; width: 20%; " |[[Image:US-GreatSeal-Obverse.svg|200px]]


 * valign="top" style="border: 2px Red solid; background: white; padding: 1em; width: 60%; " | Hello Benzocane,

Are you interested in Politics, Law or the United States? Do you enjoy expanding, creating or maintaining articles relating to those subjects? Or do you enjoy the small stuff? Or maybe you like learning about the United States Congress or the Commander in Chief.

Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying.

Thanks in advance, «  Diligent Terrier  Bot    (talk)   21:50, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

This message has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot on behalf of WikiProject United States Government.

You have received it because you are a member of a related WikiProject or you have said you are interested in your userspace.

Message written by Leonard^Bloom and Diligent Terrier. Help us get the project off the ground and flying.
 * valign="top" style="border: 2px Red solid; background: white; padding: 1em; width: 60%; " |[[Image:Air Force One over Mt. Rushmore.jpg|200px]]


 * }
 * }
 * }
 * }

AfD nomination of Climate change denial
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Climate change denial. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Climate change denial (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Research survey invitation
Greetings Benzocane-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 03:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Ichthus: January 2012
 In this issue...

- Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom
 * From the Editor
 * What are You doing For Lent?
 * Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
 * Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)