User talk:Bhugh

Deleteing other Users' Posts
Please do not delete other users' comments from pages as you did at Cleanup. It is a strong violation of wikipedia policy. Please see: Wikiquette and Wikilove. I have put back the comments that you deleted. If your disagree with the points made by other users, engage their points with your own. Deleting others comments is considered vandalism and if you continue to do it you will be banned. -JCarriker 07:10, Aug 18, 2004 (UTC) ''-Comment withdrawn by author. See below:'' -JCarriker 07:46, Aug 19, 2004 (UTC)


 * Perhaps someone needs to improve the cleanup instructions.


 * Even after reading, again, ALL the instructions for cleanup, I cannot figure out any other meaning or intention for the following instructions that appear on every page that has the cleanup marker, than deleting the listing on the cleanup page after it's reasonably cleaned up. It does NOT say "remove only your own listing" or anything of the sort.  Maybe it should?  Maybe it shouldn't say anything about removing the notice on the cleanup page?  Maybe instead of "remove" it should say something else? Quoting:


 * This article needs cleanup. Please add this article to the cleanup page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Cleanup&action=edit&section=3) and improve it in any way that you see fit. Remove this notice and the listing on the cleanup page after the article has been cleaned up.

Bhugh 15:33, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * Sorry, you're right. I only saw that you removed the comments. There also may have been a program glitch as the computer directed me to an older version of the article, one before your improvements. The version I saw would have still required cleanup. I withdraw my comment and removed the article from the cleanup list. Again, my sincerest apologies for the mix up. -JCarriker 07:46, Aug 19, 2004 (UTC) P.S. You may want to consider adding some info about yourself on your user page. :)

See Talk:Dissonance. Hyacinth 03:46, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

New York Point pic
Thanks for uploading Image:Newyorkpoint.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) Thanks so much,    – Quadell (talk) (help)   20:41, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)

Saint Petersburg's Paradox
Hello, I found your graph showing the results of a long run of simulations of the "Petersburg's Casino" very interesting. How did you do them? Ex-professo program, Excel spreadsheet, something other? If the first case, could you publish the code? I'm indeed very interested in taking a look at it. Thanks in advance TrollDeBatalla

Non-free use disputed for Image:Willy Brandt Time.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Willy Brandt Time.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

File:Doublesharp.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doublesharp.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 20:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Braillemusicsummary.dxb
Thanks for uploading File:Braillemusicsummary.dxb. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 04:01, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Thomas Brigham Bishop

 * You were involved in some discussions of this gent at Talk:John Brown's Body a few years back, and made some salient points. Perhaps you'd be interested in reviewing this new article --Thomas Brigham Bishop.  cheers.--Milowent • talkblp-r  16:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

How was File:Original-john-brown-words-george-kimball-1890.jpg obtained?
See discussion at

Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 21:29, 27 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Resolved via Media Copyright Questions Page with help from teb728 and now on commons. Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 05:06, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Eric Rowe Gedye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Herald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marcel Fodor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Magyar, Braunau and Robert Best. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Best (journalist)


A tag has been placed on Robert Best (journalist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 12:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oswald Helmuth Göhring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Westplex for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Westplex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Westplex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Confession0791 talk 17:34, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of KRFT-LD for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KRFT-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/KRFT-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 11:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)