User talk:Big101big

Welcome!

Hello, Big101big, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as El Cenit, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sparthorse (talk) 20:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of El Cenit


The article El Cenit has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced article about a student magazine that does not yet exist. Too soon and fails to show how this magazine is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 20:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of El Cenit for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article El Cenit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/El Cenit until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sparthorse (talk) 20:43, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Your article has been suggested for deletion because the magazine does not appear to be notable - see here for the relevant Wikipedia policy.

See this video for instructions about uploading an image to Wikipedia's media repository, Wikimedia commons:

Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

El Cenit
Big101big, there was a discussion of the article at: Articles_for_deletion/El_Cenit. I re-iterate my nomination of the article for deletion: "Unreferenced article about a student magazine that does not yet exist. Too soon and fails to show how this magazine is notable. Prod was contested stating "The magazine is under the compilation process", confirming this magazine does not yet exist. " In particular, follow the links I gave. The article had no independent, published reliable sources about the magazine - an example of this sort of coverage would be an article in the New York Times about the impact of El Cenit. In order for an article about El Cenit to pass Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion of articles (called "notability") you need multiple such sources that are substantial and published in independent sources. Since you have admitted the magazine does not yet exist and is simply a student magazine, it seems unlikely that any such sources could be provided, but if this is incorrect and you can cite the sources, you can recreate the article. But be aware that simply recreating the same or substantially the same article would result in it being quickly deleted from Wikipedia. Good luck, Sparthorse (talk) 20:40, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

04:29, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Big101big (talk)its excellent that you are good in wikipedia, but please respect others. Thanks, this time i will try to come up with some new york times references and links for the article. Otherwise dont bother anyone for the quickly deletion.

Just to be clear
Regarding your edit summary on Splitting of the moon: No depiction or images of Muhammad, the last prophet, is authorized to be pasted or published.

Wikipedia is not bound by any rules of Islam or any other religion. Wikipedia does not need anyone's authorization to publish historical images of Muhammad, especially images painted by a Muslim artist and published in an ancient Falnama Islamic text, as was the one you removed from the article. The prohibition you refer to is not universal among Muslims. Furthermore Wikipedia is not censored for anyone's benefit. Please read over Talk:Muhammad/FAQ to understand why such depictions will not be removed. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Big101big (talk) 04:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC) the first thing, who i insulted here, i deserve respect so do others. And secondly, whats the offense for, its a discussion i think. So be calm. Whatever found in history is not correct, if something is happening wrong today, after few decades it will be a history for that time. To me, that depiction is wrong, if its right for you, may it be. I read the page of Muahammad about the issue.