User talk:Blackmetalskinhead

Welcome!
Hello, Blackmetalskinhead, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Stalwart 111  07:29, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=610394096 your edit] to Irréversible may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * but the driver pulls over and orders them to leave the taxi, showing a can of tear gas or possibly pepper spray or mace) that he is carrying. The two men exit the cab,

Schlosser article
Right after the section of WP:LASTNAME you quoted, it says, "When referring to the person who is the subject of the article, use just the surname unless the reference is part of a list of family members or if use of the surname alone will be confusing." The entry correctly goes back to the use of "Schlosser" (for Dena) after the portion that you edited, so your edits really represent the only portion of the article where this guideline isn't applied correctly. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 00:32, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, "or if use of the surname alone will be confusing". In this instance, in a paragraph mentioning four Schlosser family members in conjunction with each other, referring to Dena Schlosser as just "Schlosser" IS confusing, especially when the paragraph describes actions taken both by Dena and by her husband, John. Without clarification the paragraph is confusing, hence the guidelines that are in place.


 * Additionally, when you have reverted my edit, you have removed other updated information from the same paragraph with no comment.Blackmetalskinhead (talk) 00:49, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't see four Schlossers referred to in the same paragraph. I do see Schlosser, her husband John and her daughter Margaret - but I think that keeping them straight is as simple as doing what I just did in the beginning of this sentence. It's more the sentence structure of this section that makes it confusing, rather than a bunch of people having the same names. I appreciate you at least explaining where you're coming from though. Sorry about removing that last mention of Dena; it wasn't right to revert to the version that had a CN tag in it. EricEnfermero  HOWDY! 00:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Excuse me, I did mean 3, not 4.

Also, keeping the full reference to Doyle's name that you rmeoved provides clarity to the quote.Blackmetalskinhead (talk) 01:05, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The quote there is really odd. It would be easier to explain the situation without a direct quote and you wouldn't need parentheses or anything like that. Undoubtedly though, I didn't make it any better by taking out the full name. EricEnfermero  HOWDY! 01:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

The quote was there before my edit, I simply provided clarification.Blackmetalskinhead (talk) 01:43, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Oi!
Nice to see a true skinhead on here, Oi! --Samotny Wędrowiec (talk) 14:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)