User talk:BoMadsen88

Welcome!
Hi BoMadsen88! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 16:54, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Elon Musk - Assuming good faith
Hey BoMadsen88. I'm commenting here about this edit, specifically where you say: As Mfb says: why would it ever make sense to add such an unusual comment - other than to again disregard Elon wherever possible. First off, it's not exactly what Mfb said, which is problematic. Mfb made an argument from policy Contrast this with your argument, which is to infer bad faith on the part of QRep2020. I would suggest that you read WP:AGF and (like Mfb) make your arguments from policy. Not only will it help your argument, but it will keep you from getting into trouble down the road. Unlike some other social media sites, assumption of good faith on Wikipedia is a rule rather than a guideline, and is interpreted rather strictly. --Elephanthunter (talk) 23:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Please sign your posts on talk pages
Hi there. I've noticed that several of your recent posts on Talk:Elon Musk have remained unsigned. I suggest you read WP:SIGN which explains the process. To sum up, just type " " at the end of your post and your signature will be added automatically, like so: Rosbif73 (talk) 09:52, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, will do in the future BoMadsen88 (talk) 10:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

COI
Hi BoMadsen88, after seeing your activties at Elon Musk, I just wanted to inform you of Wikipedia's policy regarding possible conflict of interests. I just wanted to make sure that you are aware of it. If it is not applicable to you as an editor then great. Either way, we, hopefully, can channel your enthusiasm and knowledge of the subject into improving the article. Have a nice weekend! ~ HAL  333  23:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Hal, Please elaborate. Why should there be conflict of interest? BoMadsen88 (talk) 01:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- ~ HAL  333  20:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Spamming Talk:Elon Musk
You should not be spamming talk pages by copy+pasting the same exact message over and over again, as you did on Talk:Elon Musk in these three instances:. I know you were responding to, but if you noticed, that user was warned by two administrators over the behavior. --Elephanthunter (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, yes, I did notice that he was given a warning - but that was after I had posted my replies. I just wanted to make sure that it was seen to support Jsharks claims. So it was never my intention to spam anything. And speaking of Jsharks claims, dont you also see that there is something very wrong with the way that the Elon Musk article is managed almost solely by HAL333 - and Qrep2020 who you yourself have doubts about a possible violation of COI? BoMadsen88 (talk) 16:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Well, I really don't feel like Talk:Elon Musk was the appropriate place to have that discussion. The article talk page is generally for discussing how to build the content of the article, not meta information like the behavior of specific users. You're asking me about whether I see something wrong with the article being "managed" by HAL333 and QRep2020. I don't really have any issue with HAL333's edits... keep in mind that I specifically brought up QRep2020 to the COI noticeboard, not HAL333. I also do not believe the article is being managed in the way you say. You have plenty of options to edit the article via WP:BRD, you're just choosing not to edit the article. On that topic, is there a particular reason you are not editing the article? --Elephanthunter (talk) 19:53, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I had no idea that I was able to edit the article? It shows a little blue lock and tells me that the article is protected. So I have always believed that the only way for me to have any influence on the article was by making suggestions on the Talk page. I would absolutely love to be able to contribute. How can i do that? BoMadsen88 (talk) 20:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah. You're right, Elon Musk protected so that only extended confirmed users can edit it. Slipped my mind. That's fair. You should probably find some other articles to contribute to so that you can build a working knowledge of Wikipedia and a reputation. Unfortunately BRD is not going to work for you in this instance. --Elephanthunter (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. QRep2020 (talk) 18:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Indefinite block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long term, though intermittent, harassment. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 19:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)