User talk:BologniousMonk

BologniousMonk, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi BologniousMonk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, BologniousMonk. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

File:Promotioncode-org-logo-pink.png[edit]

Can you please link to the specific place on the Promotioncode.org website where the cc-by-sa-4.0 licecne is shown. All I can find on that site is a copyright statement which unless you can show otherwise means uploading the logo is a copyright violation. That said it's use might meet the Non-free content criteria but you would need to add a {{fair use rationale}} template to the file page instead. Nthep (talk) 18:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for letting me know, as this was my first upload and I was about to do several more on other pages. If you look at the source code of any of the pages, in the footer is this:

<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/80x15.png" /></a>
PromotionCode.org Logo by <a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" href="http://www.promotioncode.org/" property="cc:attributionName" rel="cc:attributionURL">Promotion Code</a> is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License</a>.
Based on a work at <a xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" href="http://cdn.promotioncode.org/images/logo.png" rel="dct:source">http://cdn.promotioncode.org/images/logo.png</a>

I interpreted that to mean the images were of fair use under that license. I will defer to your expert opinion, though, and will edit accordingly. BologniousMonk (talk) 19:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't rely on some source code when the website states "©2008 - 2016 PromotionCode.org All rights reserved." Change it to fair use and I don't see a problem. Nthep (talk) 19:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your help. I appreciate you correct me so quickly before I did more of them wrong. BologniousMonk (talk) 19:54, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help. Nthep (talk) 20:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]