User talk:Bomberswarm2

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Bomberswarm2! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dismas and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Dismas |(talk) 10:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Proposed deletion of Gino and Mark Stocco


The article Gino and Mark Stocco has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article fails WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 05:45, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Gino and Mark Stocco for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gino and Mark Stocco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gino and Mark Stocco until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 14:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, American Dad!, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Who is Mike Shennan?
Open Mike is not a Wikipedia page. Xx236 (talk) 10:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Grayfell (talk) 07:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/. ''The sock account has been blocked per the evidence at SPI. Future puppetry will result in this account being blocked. '' RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Reverted edit on First inauguration of Lyndon B. Johnson
I removed this statement from the article, which I later found you had added: "As of 2017, it is also the last official inaugration (sic) to take place on a day other than January 20th." That is plainly incorrect because the inauguration of Gerald Ford occurred on August 9, 1974. (Others might also count Reagan's second inauguration and either or both of Obama's, but I wouldn't.) I didn't flag it as vandalism because it seems to have been a mere factual error, quite possibly because LBJ was the last President to be sworn in due to the death of his predecessor (Ford's predecessor Nixon resigned), as well as the last President sworn in by anyone other than a Chief Justice. --RBBrittain (talk) 07:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Conflict of Interest regarding User:Bomberswarm2. Thank you. UNSC Luke 1021 (talk) 16:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Rather than calling someone lazy, perhaps read what I actually wrote. I said it's too difficult to go through history to find exactly the most recent occurrence, not finding a reference too difficult; I said the record is too difficult unless ref explicitly states so. Your initial edit of adding the note was incorrect by stating it was the first time in VFL/AFL history and you made an unwarranted assumption, I corrected it by removing it and saying it wasn't true. Please remember before adding information on Wikipedia that everything needs to be cited and please avoid adding incorrect information based on an assumption in the future. Flickerd (talk) 14:12, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

YES
its good to meet someone here! have you heard of PINGAS?75.171.21.21 (talk) 00:39, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Alert
&mdash; Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 12:58, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi ! Questions about the above “Alert”? I wrote a quick & dirty FAQ—check it out here. If you have any questions about policies or editing or anything else just ask me on my talk page :-) – Lionel(talk) 05:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

you should not be allowed to edit this website
you have a long history of breaking wiki rules and to show how much your actively trying to make Wikipedia worse 1.the 1972 New York edit clearly trying to make nixon look good 2.the bellwether edit once again trying to make the republicans look good backing it up with an unrelated source 3.Massachusetts once again trying to make the republicans look good oh yippee the states former governor won one percent more than the guy that lost Indiana super 4.1948 polls showed Clinton leading by just 6 electoral votes hardly a landslide 5.home states thats still his home state 6.d.c 72 how is winning 22% notable 7.ingratiation come on 8.that time you just used a sock puppet to vandalize the birther page and then claimed discrimination classy

and those are just the ones i've found so do us all a favour just stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drowningseagull (talk • contribs) 09:43, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Error in 1992 Montana Presidential Election Map
In the 1992 Montana election map you produced, there is an error for one county: Hill County was actually won by Clinton with ~45% of the vote, whereas the map shows it being won by Bush instead. 47.19.33.202 (talk) 16:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

To another reviewer, I must leave my computer and cannot look at this closely for a bit, if I made a gross error feel free to unblock. 331dot (talk) 10:27, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Although I saw the comment by claiming to be Bomberswarm2, as see no evidence that this is correct. Unless there's an good hand/bad hand issue here (and I see no evidence of that either) I feel the block is unjustified. I will raise at WP:AN for more opinions.  O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 10:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


 * I apologize for my error in blocking you and the problems it caused you. I would understand you not forgiving this- I can only say that I have learned from this and will work to be different in the future.  Please accept my apologies.  Thank you. 331dot (talk) 22:33, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

attempted to frame you again. --Yamla (talk) 11:04, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Big chungas
I hate cats — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joo Molotov (talk • contribs) 23:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

An invitation to discussion
I kindly invite you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:17, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to the final vote on the bolding issue
Thank you for participating in the bolding issue of the election infobox earlier. We are now holding a final vote in order to reach a clear and final consensus. Please take a moment to review our discussion and vote in Template talk:Infobox election. Lmmnhn (talk) 14:52, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Other account
Can you explain this? User talk:DrowningSeagull is based  Acroterion   (talk)   12:06, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Look at this. Megan☺️   Talk to the monster  12:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , And this, i think its proper to revoke TPA Megan☺️   Talk to the monster  12:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I already looked at that and at   Acroterion   (talk)   12:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * How about looking at the section above labeled "December 2018" or ask . Doing this would of been far more useful than wasting my time with this obvious well known troll again. Bomberswarm2 (talk) 01:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Burn for a flock of live baby seagulls
Hi, Bomberswarm2! Re. Burn for You not being on Live Baby Live, are you thinking of the DVD movie rather than the audio CD?

Side note: DrowningSeagull is back under a couple of new names and still claiming to be you. He won’t last long though.

Cheers! Pelagic ( messages ) – (13:57 Sat 07, AEST) 03:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. – bradv  15:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)