User talk:Boone jenner

Welcome Boone jenner! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are users!

Hello, Boone jenner. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Jax 0677, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page, and someone will try to help. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp. The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own private sandbox] for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

 Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) 04:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jax_0677&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Nomination of I am Zozo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I am Zozo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/I am Zozo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 14:03, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Hearfourmewesique (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Lowell Green. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2013 (UTC) It is a well respected website. What is the problem exactly? I know I'm expected to keep good faith but I think you're trolling me.Boone jenner (talk) 01:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Richard Dawkins. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:34, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Justin.Parallax. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Richard Dawkins that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justin.Parallax (talk) 12:45, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to ESPN, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:32, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lincoln Fields Mall, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lincoln Heights and Century 21. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Lincoln Fields Mall) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Lincoln Fields Mall, Boone jenner!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Looks good - I've added some citations and link to the official website. I think better not add a list of everything at the mall as this will probably change regularly, but I've linked to the mall's directory."

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

November 2016
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Swinging (sexual practice) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Peaceray (talk) 06:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * P.S. You may want to discuss removing the film & television sections first on the Talk:Swinging (sexual practice) page first, since this is a major change. Peaceray (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Swinging (sexual practice) does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 06:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of C.J. Tudor
Hello Boone jenner,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged C.J. Tudor for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A tad reactionary isn't it? I'm going to be working on the article. Why speedy delete when I haven't even got it past a stub. Boones 16:20, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of C.J. Tudor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C.J. Tudor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/C.J. Tudor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 02:05, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, I'm ViperSnake151. I noticed that you recently removed content from A Little Late with Lilly Singh without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Why did you remove her well-known username? ViperSnake151   Talk  15:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Making Apes: The Artists Who Changed Film


The article Making Apes: The Artists Who Changed Film has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No sourcing found to indicate that this film would meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 06:42, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

March 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Needful Things, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 00:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I think I gave sufficient reason. And look up the term Unencyclopedic, which is exactly what these long lists of useless nerd references are. If we want Wikipedia to be taken seriously we will edit these out. Wikipedia is not a list of trivia. --Boones 21:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * First of all, "pop culture not needed" does not refer to a policy. It's an opinion. Secondly, there is no policy that forbids items related to popular culture. There are guidelines, however, that allow such items on a limited basis; see WP:TRIVIA and WP:POPCULTURE. Thirdly, this is not a "long list". It's two items, both of which are sourced. I often trim bloated trivia sections. Based on your edit history, you seem hellbent on removing them altogether. Please get WP:CONSENSUS before removing brief pop culture sections that are relevant and properly sourced. Sundayclose (talk) 21:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Problem with your custom signature
You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.


 * Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Remove anything in the text box.  (It might already be empty.)
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
 * Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Signatures. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)