User talk:Brienanni

Copyright problems with Image:Lorentz Medal.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Lorentz Medal.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Conscious 20:54, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Added info on the web site where this image came from (which is my own). brienanni

Byers-yang theorem
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Byers-yang theorem, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.scientificlib.com/en/Physics/TheoreticalPhysics/HellmannFeynmanTheorem.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:43, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virial theorem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamiltonian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Hendrika Johanna van Leeuwen photograph usage?
Dear Brienanni,

My name is Peter. I am writing a science book and am currently discussing the Bohr-van Leeuwen theorem. I would like to include a photograph of Hendrika in the margin and write a few sentences on who she was and her contribution to magnetism. Would you happen to know if I can have permission to use the image on the wikipedia page? I hope you don't mind me contacting you regarding this, but you seem to have been in contact with the copyright holder. I would be very grateful if I could use her image in my book!

Thanking you,

Peter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.217.133.230 (talk) 22:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

'''[Please add your email address to your question, to allow for follow-up.]

File:HJ van Leeuwen.png to Wikimedia Commons?
Could you please ask the copyright owners permission to put this image on Wikimedia Commons, say under the licence CC-BY-SA-3.0, or if the creator died before 1946 Public domain? Then Dutch and other wikipedia's and Peter (see above) could use it. The photograph seems to be taken around 1920. Thank you, regards, Hansmuller (talk) 09:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:HJ van Leeuwen.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HJ van Leeuwen.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Added the requested rationale-notice brienanni

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyprian and Daphrose Rugamba has been accepted
 Cyprian and Daphrose Rugamba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

AfC notification: Draft:Aemilianus van Heel has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aemilianus van Heel. Thanks! 07:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC) Changed the "web" ref into a "news" ref (the newspaper article is not freely available online) brienanni

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aemilianus van Heel (June 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aemilianus van Heel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dr Strauss  talk  15:06, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question
Hello, Brienanni! I'm Jcc. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:21, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aemilianus van Heel has been accepted
 Aemilianus van Heel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Unspecified source/license for File:Cyprien and Daphrose Rugamba (Kigali, Rwanda, 1992).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cyprien and Daphrose Rugamba (Kigali, Rwanda, 1992).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Copyright info added Brienanni (talk) 16:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

new development related to the Aharanov-Bohm effect
Dear Brienanni,

You blocked an addition I made to the Aharanov-Bohm Effect and then asserted that this was my "own original research".

It is not my own research, rather it is the work of Rizzi and Pearle.

It is not original (as in unpublished) because their two papers were published recently in Phys Rev A.

So your statement is unfounded.

Please sign your work and provide links to your refs so we can decide if they conform to Wiki guidelines. Thanks, Jobberone (talk) 22:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ice skating, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deformation ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ice_skating check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ice_skating?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the edit! See my reply at Talk:Majorana equation for an explanation of the meta-problem, which is this "ELKO" thing. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 21:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Last names
Hi there, regarding, the literature seems to disagree. See, for instance,
 * Extract of page 188
 * Extract of page 306
 * Extract of page 236
 * Extract of page 767
 * Extract of page 16
 * (many more)

Please restore the original. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 16:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)


 * the correct capitalization rule is clear, "van" or "de" if preceded by a first name, otherwise "Van" and "De", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_(Dutch) Brienanni (talk) 16:37, 12 January 2022 (UTC)


 * (I have indented your reply - hope you don't mind.)
 * What the Dutch do is not relevant here, as this is the English Wikipedia, and all the above sources are English language sources. Clearly the literature consensus is lowercase van, and I think we should follow the literature. Besides, you are referring to a Wikipedia article here, which is not a reliable source, and even if it were, this is not the Dutch Wikipedia. It is clear from the literature that both the person and his theorem are spelled with lowercase, as it was done in that article ever since it was created. - DVdm (talk) 17:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note, please continue on the article page Talk:Van Cittert–Zernike theorem, so other contributors can weigh in. Thanks and cheers. - DVdm (talk) 17:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

relax, I have no intention of fighting this; I guess you'll also want to change Brienanni (talk) 18:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Haas–Van_Alphen_effect


 * Please indent your talk page messages as outlined in wp:THREAD and wp:INDENT — See Help:Using talk pages. Thanks.
 * Ok, thanks. I have restored the original version. Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 18:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

May 2024
Your edit to Carlo Beenakker has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)