User talk:Brzikraken

Unblock


 * I never claimed to there is more people or something. How is possible this "Contributing to the same page with clearly linked, legitimate, alternative accounts (e.g. editing the same page with your main and public computer account or editing a page using your main account that your bot account edited) is not forbidden." How to link, how to that make? I don't have any problem about to prove my identity to Wikipedia admins or to be under cheking or anything what is in rules. Or to that be put together. I am deep sorry for me not understanding and not deeply going into rules. And I am willing to fix that on anyway possible.Brzikraken (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Request to unblock

 * You didn't explicitly claim that there were two people, but you also didn't clarify that the two accounts are run by the same person. One way to link the accounts would be to put notes on both user pages that say something like "This is an alternate account of [other user name]" though generally it is better to stick to one account unless there is a genuine need to have more.
 * Bbb23, the given explanation seems plausible to me, and I don't see any harm done here. If it were not a CheckUser block I would consider giving the editor a second chance. What are your thoughts? Huon (talk) 21:38, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I am really sorry about my mistake. I really regret and I am a little embarassed about my mistake and about rules what I didnt follow. I can take any checking or control or anything about behaviour or edits if decided to be unblocked. I let all in your hands and and I am ready to accept any decision . Brzikraken (talk) 21:47, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * There are two problems. First, the master account, although never blocked, received a great many warnings, despite not all that many edits. Second, the user has persistently edited while logged out, which continues. Indeed, the master account was accused of doing so in an abusive manner.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:57, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I am embarassed about my mistakes, I never was blocked about editing or edit war or so and never had serious trouble about Wikipedia /except beeng attacked by one user at my ex account for what that user got blocked for one week or something like that/. I took my accounts just to can check my edits more easy and to follow history of edits and to be able to get easy to talk pages about articles what cant be get easy on mobile phone Wiki version and I use mostly mobile phone editing. And didnt know about linking main one with alternative account. /still I am reading rules about that, right now/. But I always tried to explain edits in summary always with my editing. And never edited as vandalism and never my edits were described like that to I know. I have to mention to English is not my native language and to I am sorry about not beeng more careful with rules and with checking rules about using accounts and log in and all that topics. If unblocked I will take great care about behaviour in all ways and accept to be checked in any way possible. And as I said I accept my mistakes and also accept all consecvences of my mistakes and I apologize deeply about taking time of Wikipedians.Brzikraken (talk) 22:11, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Update. I researched all aspects of the Wikipedia policies from creating accounts, alternative accounts, to editing and manual of style, more also about content policies. And I strongly believe I can contribute to the Wikipedia in one good way and to my mistakes won't happen ever again. And I don't have and problem with respecting Wikipedia rules in a way how it is described. For me will be even good to my previous account be connected to this account as alternative or something like that. I am deeply sorry for my mistakes and I trully regret me beeng not careful about rules and not checked rules on the right time, before even started to edit Wikipedia. For me it is even really big shame to I was behaving without greater care. And those things won't ever repeat if I get new chance here. Thank you. Brzikraken (talk) 10:16, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrija Artuković, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Andrija_Artukovi%C4%87 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Andrija_Artukovi%C4%87?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)