User talk:CameoAppearance

Image copyright problem with Image:Down-SimianCrease.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Down-SimianCrease.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

love ur username
cute! btw i looked at ur page and my fingers starting itching to align ur userboxes across the middle of ur page, instead of going down in a long column, but lots of people don't appreciate having their pages touched, so i'm not going to do anything. *twitches frantically* riana 11:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

AFD
As an inclusionist, please review Articles for deletion/List of relationships with age disparity and please take a side.

Yay
Hooray for the userbox Macarion 00:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

thanks for Brat!
Hi there. I've been moving the article on Shade's Children slowly forward, and wanted to give you a quick thanks for adding the description of Brat, a minor character about whom I had nearly completely forgotten. :p It really helps! :) Have a nice day (or night, I don't remember the time conversion from Montreal to Vancouver.)

Nihiltres 04:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Ahoy!
I saw you on JONJONAUG's page, and thought I'd say 'Hi'. Why am I not surprised you mention grammar edits as something you do? --AlmostReadytoFly 21:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for improving my userbox. --Gray Porpoise 19:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

WP:CHILD
There are a number of supporters for WP:CHILD, but by its talk page it's obvious there's at least as many opposers. That means that yes, there is a lack of consensus for this proposal, and per WP:POL, "a rejected proposal is any proposal that does not have consensual support, regardless of whether or not discussion is still ongoing". Unless consensus actually supports a proposal, the proposal fails (which, incidentally, happens to about 80% of proposals on the Wiki).

On a Wiki, changes do not generally have to be proposed; what I simply did was note the fact that there is no consensus for this proposal (nor will there likely be in the foreseeable future) and made a note of such on its page.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  10:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I understand that, but what I saw didn't seem to be outright rejection so much as either the process of discussion or an inability to decide. Now, again, I don't know how long discussion has to go on for such a thing to be decided, but this thing hasn't even been around for a full month. Surely it's reasonable to give the community more time for debate? CameoAppearance 12:16, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * There aren't really any formal rules about how long something has to be discussed (indeed, I've seen proposals closed after a day or two, usually on grounds that "nobody likes this except the proposer"). The thing is that there isn't really discussion about wording or specifics, but instead there is a significant number of people who object to the very principle. To implement a proposal, you'd have a strong majority of opinions supporting it; that is simply not the case here.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  13:11, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * If you say so, I'm just saying that it doesn't really seem to have been actively rejected. I'm not as aware of the criteria for closing as you are. CameoAppearance orate 13:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Protecting children's privacy
Hi. You contributed to the discussion at Protecting children's privacy. If you have the time and interest, I'm asking contributors to past a brief summary of their position on the proposal here, thanks. Herostratus 20:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Royalguard11/Userbox personalities
Sorry, I wasn't the one that changed it. It might be changed back too. It's a constantly changing essay. Although, there is now an official userbox to represent you view! Most talk about it is happening on WT:UBM under new essay. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk) 04:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * *shrug* It's not a big deal, really. I just wanted to indicate what I'd be under the new categories. CameoAppearance orate 04:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Why did you remove your comment from Talk:Tranquility Bay?
You made a statement implying that you were going to improve the article, but then removed it. Why? CameoAppearance orate 17:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The edit summary was "nm" - short for "never mind." I was busy with schoolwork and couldn't catch the documentary I could've used as a source. --Kizor 17:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Wait...
...if you're Canadian how did the FBI get your flux capacitor? 68.39.174.238 07:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, they basically just looked like a couple of dudes in black suits and sunglasses. They could've been FBI, CIA, CSIS, MIB... CameoAppearance orate 09:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank You!
Thank you for your input at my RFA, which successfully closed at 58/2/0. I will think about the 10 questions and answers I had, and I hope that I will use the tools constructively and for the benefit of Wikipedia. If you ever need any help, don't be afraid to drop me a line. I'm here to help afterall! ‎8) -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I like your user page!
How did you create all those cool biographical things down the side? Cheers! - Wikiwag 14:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

User Category for Discussion
 A category created by you or to which you have significantly contributed is being considered for deletion, rename, move or merge in accordance with Wikipedia's Categories for Discussion policies. This does not mean that any of the userpages in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized. Please share your thoughts on the matter at this category's entry on the User categories for discussion page. VegaDark 03:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Human Cloning
I think I have an answer for you. Of course, it would be best if an actual conservative could tell you, but here's what I gather:

To the best of my understanding, conservatives object to therapeutic cloning (creation of replacement tissues, such as cloning just a liver or just a heart) because it uses up a whole embryo, which they believe would otherwise develop into a whole human being. They object to reproductive cloning (the creation of a new organism, such as Dolly, a cloned racehorse, or a cloned baby) because of the risks. Creating a human clone, even one that the parents intend to raise like any other child, would involve the loss of as many or more human embryos than the sheep embryos that it took to make Dolly. In other words, I think that conservatives object to reproductive cloning for the same reason that they object to fertility clinics: they don't like how many embryos go down the drain.

So, hypothetically, if we could perfect the process to the point where the cells intended for organ growth never went through a totipotent stage or to the point where only one human embryo would be needed to create a baby, the conservatives would no longer object. However, I haven't heard them lining up behind the use of PGA to create new human embryonic stem cell lines (This process doesn't destroy embryos; it just takes a little sample), so there are probably more layers to this issue than I can see on the surface. Darkfrog24 18:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Ack eeeeik squeee
Areeee'kkkkk squee ack ok'k ook'eeee eeeeik squeee'kk. Sreeeee'okok eeeeeeee'kk. --Dynaflow 02:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Miss Martindale article nominated for deletion
I am writing to inform editors who contributed to the Miss Martindale article that the article has been nominated for deletion. You are encouraged to weigh in on whether the article should be deleted, by voting here. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page. Thank you! Joie de Vivre 22:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject U2 invitation

Safia Aoude
In order to defeat the "deletionists" would you be prepared to keep Safia Aoude's article?Phase4 11:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Volapük
Hi CameoAppearance. I've found your name via the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians at Meta and thought you might care about this discussion: Proposals for closing projects/Radical cleanup of Volapük Wikipedia. In case you agree that massively deleting stubs is not going to help the Volapük Wikipedia, you could help us fight against this proposal with your vote. Thanks in advance! Smeira 02:27, 16 January 2007.

File:Littlepurpleplanet.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Littlepurpleplanet.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:24, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Itex
A tag has been placed on Itex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

spam

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 86.29.243.103 (talk) 14:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron


I notice that you are part of Category:Inclusionist_Wikipedians. I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Littlepurpleplanet.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Littlepurpleplanet.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:47, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:User dlph-0
Template:User dlph-0, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User dlph-0 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Template:User dlph-0 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:26, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Uterus transplants
Added a little bit on application on transgender women as per request —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.145.124.75 (talk) 18:50, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Survey
Hi Cameo!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 00:30, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to Vancouver meetup
Hello,

Wikipedian British Columbians are planning a meetup at the Vancouver Public Library, Central Branch, on Sunday, October 16th, as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events. If you wish to attend, please see Meetup/Vancouver and add your signature to the list.

Thank you! Inverse Hypercube 02:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to Vancouver meetup
Hello,

You are invited to an edit-a-thon at the Prophouse Café on Sunday March 25, as part of Women's History Month events all over the world. If you wish to attend, please see Meetup/Vancouver WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon and add your signature to the list.

Thank you! Inverse Hypercube (talk) 09:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Anti-iPod.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)