User talk:Camipco

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
 * Read the article describing how to edit a page and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
 * When editing pages, use the preview button before submitting and try to fill in the summary box for every edit.
 * Eventually, read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck! Jrdioko

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~ (4 tildes).

Hello, Atlantic traveller Jamie! Welcome from all of us.

When you've copied your list of interests from the New User Log to create the first version of your User Page, you will probably want to exercise your newshound skills at 2004 or one of its linked pages.

Enjoy! - Robin Patterson 02:24, 26 May 2004 (UTC)

Not a problem
and I'm glad you took it that way. Articles like "Islamicism" are designed for causing edit wars and hard feelings amongst editors BTW, so be careful ;) Not that you seem to have any failing in this area, you have already made a particularly good impression on me by your ability accept contructive criticism, something some of the old hands and admins around here would find impossible to say the least. One of the most important things to keep in mind on the wiki is not to allow our egos to get in the way of what is best for the articles, and at the same time to be aware that many do, and thus a calm and cautious, well-worded approach is often the best way to solve a disagreement, rather than the "how could you be such an ignorant ape?" sort of edit summary ;) I've had people on here question my ability to read, strange as that may seem. Anyways I glad to see you are one of the harmonious types who eventually succeed in producing brilliant articles thru concensus, rather than burning out fast in flame wars. Cheers, Sam [Spade] 21:10, 30 May 2004 (UTC)

reverting again
Thanks for the additional revert on the Columbus article. I hate it when different IPs are doing tag-team vandalism. Joyous (talk) July 8, 2005 20:24 (UTC)

Avant
I've added a disambig block to the top of Avant (or rather, extended a disambig block), so hopefully that'll help anyone who gets lost. I'll see if I can fix those links sometime soon. Tuf-Kat 21:12, September 1, 2005 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:42, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Sex Work Activists
I'm unclear on the parameters of this category. If it's for people who organize and demonstrate for the rights of sex workers, there will need to be sources to this effect in the person's article. Looking at the people included, it doesn't seem apt to include anyone who is any kind of activist who has also done sex work. Or is it? - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 03:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of companies involved in the Holocaust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puma. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)