User talk:CaptainAugus

Baltic Sea
If you want to change the name of the article, please do it the right way, through a title change request. Your edits are disruptive and they need to stop. El_C 02:07, 4 June 2020 (UTC)


 * As per your request I shall do so, forgive if my method was not the right one but I just couldnt stand to see such a mistake in the Wikipedia so i tried to fix it, the fact that the article as it stands now doesnt even mention the Mya is just atrocious and even offensive, Im sure you must understand the feel CaptainAugus (talk) 08:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Your request at WP:RM/TR is not uncontroversial, so has been transferred to Talk:Baltic Sea for discussion. Station1 (talk) 09:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't. Your request makes little sense to me. El_C 09:49, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Well that just goes to show your own ignorance on the subject if you dont get it, dont worry there is always new stuff to learn friend CaptainAugus (talk) 11:34, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. El_C 11:40, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * my friend excuse me but you are the one attacking me calling me detached and denying my CORRECTION merely because as you yourself said, "it doesnt makes sense to you"CaptainAugus (talk) 11:44, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Referring to your level of detachment in this matter is a statement of fact, not an attack. El_C 11:45, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you restore your attack again, you will be sanctioned. El_C 11:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Referring to your superiority complex for declaring things you dont understand are not valid is a statement of a fact, not an attack, also if you had at least taken the trouble of reading my correction you would have noticed i deleted the part where i call you out, but asking for you to read before reverting seems to be a bit too muchCaptainAugus (talk) 11:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * It is not, it is a personal attack, which you will be sanctioned for if it is restored. And maybe you should use accurate edit summaries rather than automated ones, if you wish for errors like that to be avoided. El_C 11:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Why excuse me good sir, its my own fault for expecting you to read it, wont happen again, next time i will specify each thing as per your requestCaptainAugus (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The sarcasm is unnecessary and reflects poorly on you. El_C 11:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * So we can agree that it should at least be stated in the Geology section of the article it should say Mya Sea instead of "Post-Littorina"? since thats literally what Mya is, the one that came after Littorina. CaptainAugus (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I have no idea about that. You should query the article talk page for clarification. El_C 12:01, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Your recent editing history at Baltic Sea shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bishonen &#124; tålk 17:35, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 22:43, 5 June 2020 (UTC)