User talk:Catholic Laitinen

Welcome to Catholic Laitinen's talk page! Please be respectful and descriptive while leaving me a message, and make sure you sign with four of these symbols (~). Disrespect, disregard, and any kind of vandalism, disruption, or impropriety are not allowed, and any messages containing these things will be removed promptly. Please leave your message in the first empty entry you see. If you wish to request an edit you are unable to do yourself, such as accepting an edit or reverting several, blatant acts of vandalism, please leave your request below and I'd be glad to help!

Charlotte Flair
Hi there. The sources that are referred to only say The Queen. I am also aware that both her and Sasha were toying with "who The Iron Queen was", but I believe that was a part of the gimmick of the match as opposed to an actual nickname for the winner. Thanks. DantODB 20:29, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I noticed that the content of the source changed after the event it pertained to took place on Monday night. Prior to the start of the event, it spoke of the "self-proclaimed Iron Queen" preparing to defeat Bayley.  In time, we will see if the name was just a gimmick or whether WWE will make it stick.  Thank you for elaborating!   ☧Catholic Laitinen☧ (talk)  23:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Entry 2
Write message here.

Entry 3
Write message here.

MfD nomination of User:Catholic Laitinen/Mispronunciations and Spelling Errors
User:Catholic Laitinen/Mispronunciations and Spelling Errors, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Catholic Laitinen/Mispronunciations and Spelling Errors and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Catholic Laitinen/Mispronunciations and Spelling Errors during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:8-Week Old German Shepherd Puppy.jpg


The file File:8-Week Old German Shepherd Puppy.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned userspace-only file."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 14:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy deletion on file requested. ☧Catholic Laitinen☧ (talk)  18:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Template:Easter inactivity userbox
Template:Easter inactivity userbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:Easter inactivity userbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Template:Easter inactivity userbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:13, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CL Holiday Season
Template:CL Holiday Season has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CL accept
Template:CL accept has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CL notaccept
Template:CL notaccept has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:38, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CL welcomeuser
Template:CL welcomeuser has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:49, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Alexa Bliss
Don't revert. I am not going to get into a revert over something correct. Leave it. Thank you. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 05:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you're talking about or who you are, to my knowledge I've never reverted an edit of yours. ☧Catholic Laitinen ☧ (talk)  17:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

User talk pages
I like your image of Alexa Bliss, but you need to be careful. Users can almost always remove warnings from their own talk page. See WP:OWNTALK. I'd hate for you to get a block for edit warring or disruptive editing. Just a friendly reminder. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * All I'd have to do is go into their contribs and find five or ten examples of how disruptive they are and I highly doubt anything would happen to me. I do thank you for your concern, it is appreciated! ☧Catholic Laitinen ☧ (talk)  03:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't be too sure. Sometimes both people involved in a dispute are blocked when both have violated policy. See WP:BOOMERANG. Restoring a user's warnings isn't the worst of offenses, but if you do it repeatedly it gets more serious. Edit warrning, of course, is quite serious. My main point is don't restore warnings if a user removes them. There's no need; when an editor removes a warning, it's evidence they have read it. Sundayclose (talk) 03:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I'll be the first to admit my reactions to conflict haven't always been within WP policy, but I'm fortunate to have not been blocked. I don't intend to restore the warnings again and an administrator is already prepared to handle the situation if and when my photo is taken down the next time. :) ☧Catholic Laitinen ☧ (talk)  16:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Alexa Bliss photo
Please be careful, and look at Alexa Bliss article's history. It was not me who changed your photo. And please, don't threaten me about get blocking again, you do this every time. It's getting annoying. Nobody has a problem with "your" photo. Thanks. Etacarinaee (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm not threatening anybody and I know you didn't remove my photo, it's still there in a different section. The fact that you removed yet another higher quality photo and replaced it with one years old and blurry is ridiculous. The only person who has a problem with other photos' permissions is you. ☧Catholic Laitinen ☧ (talk) 02:07, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You can trust me, I don't have a problem with your photo. But please don't send any warning messages again, I'm really sick of them. That is enough. Etacarinaee (talk) 11:28, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

History of Sweden
What content? I don’t remember doing such. I edited Lorenzo Colombo’s goal tally to reflect his goal yesterday on his first official debut. I don’t know jack about the history of Sweden, and I didn’t edit anything related to it. Why would I remove content? What for? Temp (talk) 15:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Temp (talk) 15:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you're talking about? I checked my contributions and made no edits or reversions on that article. Hmm... ☧Catholic Laitinen ☧ (talk)  04:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Catholic Laitinen & Family 2015.jpg


The file File:Catholic Laitinen & Family 2015.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Personal pictures, no longer used."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Lexi Kaufman Wikipedia Free.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lexi Kaufman Wikipedia Free.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 14:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CL returneditingrights
Template:CL returneditingrights has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 10:49, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:UBX/CL Male
User:UBX/CL Male, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/CL Male and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:UBX/CL Male during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. #prodraxis connect 22:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Kinopiko talk 20:35, 1 December 2023 (UTC)