User talk:Cen2s2s

Proposed deletion of List of musicians who died tragically young
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of musicians who died tragically young, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * "Tragically young" is highly ambiguous, and as such this list is OR.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 10:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of musicians who died young
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of musicians who died young, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Algébrico (talk) 18:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Oozehead
I just wondered if there is much more to be said about Oozehead or if it could be merged in to Blackburn Rovers F.C.? Same for Leamington Road as well. Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 10:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Goal of the Month (England) for deletion
The article Goal of the Month (England) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Goal of the Month (England) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sandman888 (talk) 13:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lost the dressing room


The article Lost the dressing room has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Basically a neologism, and certainly a phrase I've never heard before, despite being a massive football fan

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 12:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Lost the dressing room for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lost the dressing room is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lost the dressing room until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 16:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of football clubs' appearances at the Millennium Stadium for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of football clubs' appearances at the Millennium Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of football clubs' appearances at the Millennium Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz 679 19:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Files missing description details
Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as: are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Mindreader1.jpg
 * File:Mindreader2.jpg
 * File:Mindreader3.jpg

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tactical foul


The article Tactical foul has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article is a duplicate. The information can be found on the page Fouls and misconduct (association football)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Kndimov (talk) 22:03, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Tactical foul for deletion
The article Tactical foul is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tactical foul until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Kndimov (talk) 15:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Blossoms at Castlefield Bowl.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Blossoms at Castlefield Bowl.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 11:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:4,000 Holes fanzines.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:4,000 Holes fanzines.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. – Train2104 (t • c) 12:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (1992 Football League Second Division play-off Final) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 1992 Football League Second Division play-off Final, Cen2s2s!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability."

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Meatsgains (talk) 02:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 4,000 Holes


The article 4,000 Holes has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable fanzine, no reliable or third party sources, fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jellyman (talk) 17:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:4,000 Holes fanzine.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:4,000 Holes fanzine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Last-minute goal


The article Last-minute goal has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The article fails to meet WP:GNG, list in the article has no consistent criteria and premise of the article is discussed at Glossary of association football terms."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Clyde1998 (talk) 07:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of snooker records and statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Gilbert. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Sloggers moved to draftspace
Thanks for creating Sloggers. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 07:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sloggers
Hello, Cen2s2s. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sloggers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sloggers


Hello, Cen2s2s. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sloggers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)