User talk:Cherries Jubilee

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Slgrandson 01:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

A Minor Barnstar for you
Here I was going to give you the award but someone else already did it. Thank you so much for all your help! H2P (Yell at me for what I've done) 06:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Wow.. thanks! I haven't quite done them all yet. I just have the individual episode pages left but I'm about to do them now. Cherries Jubilee 22:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

The O.C. Aging
Hey there Cherries. I appreciate you discussing this with me and I agree that the whole aging process is confusing, however as long as the date of birth is mentioned, I see no reason to include the ages BEFORE the flashforward sequence. While the show was still running, Wikipedia users would update the ages of O.C. characters from season to season, however since the show has come to an end, I think we should simply include the age the characters were in their final appearance. I don't mind how we do this, as long as we don't have 3-4 ages for each character, which is overkill IMO. Cheers. Sillygostly 09:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

About Battlefield V
Hi Cherries. I think "perceived" should be removed because simply - beyond the debate - DICE itself claimed to have undertaken a more imaginative vision of WWII in the game. I mean: after all, the developers themselves consider it to be so. And actually a bit of historical inaccuracy seems to be there. So I would not use "perceived". Lone Internaut (talk) 06:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Okay, I see what you mean. However, I still think a qualifier would be good. It's not like the previous games were 100% accurate and lack of historicity complaints varied from ones that were completely fair and accurate to ones that were historically inaccurate themselves. So something like "... causing backlash from fans of the series for the increased lack of historical accuracy in the series..." or "... causing backlash from fans of the series for the degree of historical inaccuracy..." Cherries Jubilee (talk) 06:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


 * I think the second one would work fine. Lone Internaut (talk) 18:34, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


 * I'll edit it in then. Cherries Jubilee (talk) 01:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC)