User talk:Chodges

Thanks for your work on Molecular motors. If you have a chance, please visit: WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology. --JWSchmidt 13:05, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

I responded to your comments. Eugene Kwan 03:52, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Harrison Act
The harrison narcotics act article, as you questioned its constitutionality, I found a case that partially challenged it regarding to medical practice, Linder v. United States. Wooyi 05:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Number of animals in shelters - Animal Testing
Well, unless you think that statistics about the number of animals used for food or for fur or in circuses would also be appropriate. The actual number of animals used makes sense to include but not a comparison to an entirely different subject. I will revert back unless you have some reason for including this irrelevant data.Bob98133 18:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * For starters, what you added now says that 10% of euthanized animals are used for research, although I'm sure that's not what you meant. Why would some other use of animals clarify documented numbers? This article is about Animal Testing, not other animal use. The shelter numbers make no sense whatsoever, anymore than # of cars produced or general population numbers. Bob98133 18:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * OK - I see. You think the euthansia of the same type of animal is what makes this info relevant. That's really abstract and just not relevant. It also just doesn't make sense to use a comparison that is as controversial as the article. Adding that sentence gives no better understanding of the topic whatsoever unless you assume that all readers have a better appreciation of shelter death statistics with which to make the comparison. Bob98133 20:04, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Chromatin Structures Image
Thanks for the notice re: the mistake in the chromatin structures image. You've got a keen eye for detail! I thought I should say though, that it's only by chance that I noticed that a comment had been made - if you notice a mistake like that in the future, it might be an idea to contact the author(s) directly so that the mistake doesn't slip by unnoticed (I bet it'd have been a long, long time before this was corrected if I hadn't happened to take a look at my watchlist (for the first time in months!). I've finished correcting it and I'm uploading the corrected version now:

--Seans Potato Business 11:41, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Block
Good point, extended to a week. Can't go much longer since this is the first time they have been blocked. Tim Vickers 22:37, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Images
Not mine, I'm afraid. These were talen from the PDB molecule of the month series. Tim Vickers (talk) 18:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

You are invited to join Stanford's Wikiproject!
ralphamale (talk) 21:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Society for Biological Engineering moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Society for Biological Engineering, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:44, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Society for Biological Engineering concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Society for Biological Engineering, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Society for Biological Engineering


Hello, Chodges. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Society for Biological Engineering".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Nucleosome.svg


The file File:Nucleosome.svg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Superseded by File:Nucleosome organization.png, which has more detail and lacks the SVG errors this one has."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 09:48, 11 June 2021 (UTC)