User talk:Clasqm

You've got a redirect from cheetah to the species name, and a new entry in felidae, but no page at the far end of the redirect. I'm hoping this just means you went to lunch; let me know if you need a hand here. Vicki Rosenzweig

No, I think it was my brain that went out to lunch ... clasqm

Re: Shri Aurobindo - It would help to have complete clarification here so any unknown vistor to an encyclopedia can discern exactly who, what, where is being talked about....DW

Hi Clasqm, As 'n blerrie kaaskop jou mag vra: could you please convert the page clasqm on af.wiki into a userpage? Af.wiki is now in its 3rd phase and we are trying to clean up and put in interwikilinks. Dankie af:Gebruiker:Jcwf Nog 'n vraag: is dit amptelik KwaZulu-Natal of Kwazulu-Natal? Andre Engels het dit naar 'z' verskuif en ek dink dis nie regtig nie.

South African Collaboration of the Week!
Hello, this is just a brief, friendly announcement to let you know that there is now a South African Collaboration of the Week where we vote every two weeks to select an article about South Africa that is either a stub or nonexistent and attempt make it featured article quality by the end of the week. Your comments, voting, and participation would be very welcome! PZFUN 17:48, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

af.Wikipedia
Ek sien jy was lanklaas op die Afrikaanse Wikipedia? Laaste wysiging op 21:30, 20 November 2001. Kom asb. terug! :D ► Adriaan90 ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ 10:24, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Skipstone


The article Skipstone has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unremarkable software product

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 13:17, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Bread
I have nominated Bread, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Bread. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Valley2 city ‽ 07:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I apologize for the automated notification, this is meant as an April Fools Joke. Valley2 city ‽ 07:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Your user page
Hello, I found your user page while doing some wikiarchaeology. . I have restored all of its earliest surviving revisions from old copies of the Wikipedia database, so they are available to everyone now. Hope you don't mind. Graham 87 06:40, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Haiku Applications
 * added a link pointing to Zip


 * Pe (text editor)
 * added a link pointing to IDE

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Robot for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:07, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
Dear ,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. &#x200B;

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 02:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 817 BC for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 817 BC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/817 BC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 777burger talk contribs 22:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Raster graphics editor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raster graphics editor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Raster graphics editor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. DavidEfraim (talk) 12:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)