User talk:Clivemacd

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Victuallers (talk) 18:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Can you help me? 28/10/15
Hello! My name is James, and full disclosure, I'm the junior communications officer in the constituency office for the MP Tania Mathias. I was wondering if I could send you a headshot picture (I have a few!) of Tania for the wiki article as it currently lacks a picture. I did a little bit of research into the pictures tags and copyright issues, and I think it comes under {Withpermission} and {Non-free promotional}, I would add it myself but I'm a new user as you can see. No worries if you're busy though!
 * If it's not your own work, you'll have to get the person who owns the photo to go through OTRS and donate the image, see WP:DONATEIMAGE. -- Kethrus &#124;talk to me 13:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, it might be easier if I take a picture on my phone then, but I'll look into the precise copyright of the promotional photographs before I donate. Thanks for your help!

Disambiguation link notification for September 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wyatt Earp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Posse comitatus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Whaam!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Post hoc. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Derbyshire Blues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whig. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pragmatic Sanction of 1549, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Particularism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ezekiel's Temple (June 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ezekiel's Temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 15:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ezekiel's Temple has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ezekiel's Temple. Thanks! Dr Strauss  talk  09:44, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ezekiel's Temple has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ezekiel's Temple. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 10:28, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * See update added to draft article talk page.Clivemacd (talk) 10:41, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ezekiel's Temple has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ezekiel's Temple. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 18:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ezekiel's Temple has been accepted
 Ezekiel's Temple, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  15:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

WP:RM
"The discussion process is used for potentially controversial moves. The move is potentially controversial if any of the following apply: Use this process if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested."
 * There is an existing article (not just a redirect) at the target title;
 * There has been any past debate about the best title for the page;
 * Someone could reasonably disagree with the move.

See also WP:RMUM: "If you disagree with [an undiscussed] move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move."

This language, by the way, did not exist when I performed the first move back in April 2006, over a decade ago. Maybe I was wrong then, but it doesn't matter. The title I chose proved uncontroversial for over ten years until a few days ago. And the title you chose—Conrad I of Franconia—isn't even the original title of the page. Why not just open an RM? Srnec (talk) 00:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)