User talk:CoastRedwood

June 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Megatsunami, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Stop doing this. Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source. If there are reliable sources in the article you are attempting to cite then you may copy the references over. And please read WP:EW.'' Meters (talk) 06:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

About me using a blog as a source.
The blog’s information is sourced exactly sourced from the Australian Institute of Criminology. So don’t undo it. CoastRedwood (talk) 16:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Space telescope into Spacecraft. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:58, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Spacecraft
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Spacecraft, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20CoastRedwood&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1171462074 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:00, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spacecraft&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1171462074%7CSpacecraft%5D%5D Ask for help])

Copying within Wikipedia
You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Launch vehicle. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.~  S Philbrick  (Talk)  15:16, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lea Tree has been accepted
 Lea Tree, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Lea_Tree help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! ––– GMH MELBOURNE  08:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Super heavy-lift launch vehicle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page N1. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year, CoastRedwood!


Happy New Year! CoastRedwood, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Abishe (talk) 14:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:26, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Year edits
It was decided close to five years ago that we wouldn't include eclipses in main year articles. As far as domestic events go, every country has a respective year page ie 2024 in the United States, 2024 in China, etc.

The point of omitting most domestic events is Wikipedia tends to only focus on western countries, limiting domestic events to their respective country articles allows editors to contribute evenly for each one and we can avoid having a bias toward one part of the world.

Searching through the archives at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years will allow you to find areas where consensus was made on what events we include in main year articles and my edits are based on that. Thanks. PaulRKil (talk) 13:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. PaulRKil (talk) 19:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Volcanism
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Volcanism, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20CoastRedwood&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1214114683 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Volcanism&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1214114683%7CVolcanism%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Volcanism, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Europa, Pascal and Triton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)