User talk:Cooke

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

And see reply at Talk:I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue

Simply south (talk) 22:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Savoury (small dish)
Another editor has added the  template to the article Savoury (small dish), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Medeberry
Hello Cooke -- nice of you to write. I'm in Vancouver. I have researched wolfberry for 7 years, including reading translated Chinese literature, studying Linnaeus' monographs, interpreting all the western medical literature ever published on it then writing a science-based book, http://wolfberry.org. Botanically, there is no connection whatsoever to the name medeberry. There is no USDA reference to it, and in fact, there is no verifiable reference to it anywhere -- science, marketing, vernacular, or in Vancouver's Chinatown.

I'm interested in where you found the name. But in editing the article, medeberry cannot be accepted as valid etymology, especially in the context of a section in which the researched reference by GRIN of the USDA does not include it as a synonym, http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?22939

Kind regards -- Paul--Paul144 (talk) 17:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello again, Cooke -- As there isn't a verifiable or scientific reference to medeberry, I remain unconvinced that the name is accurate. It certainly isn't in common use. Further, my guess is that medeberry is a misnomer similar to "medlar" which -- even in China -- has been used to name wolfberry. You can look up medlar on Wikipedia, and see there is no relation.

I interpret Wikipedia as a complete encyclopedia that should give scientific background wherever it exists. The USDA GRIN database is not an American-only database, but rather one that derives from research around the world. If you know a better one, then refer to it.

Meanwhile, I'm back where we were at the beginning: every credible reference I can check reveals medeberry as an obscure name at best, probably an inaccurate name, and certainly an uncommon name not worthy of being in the encyclopedia.--Paul144 (talk) 02:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

A chinese shop near my house, (in North London), sells them and the packaging calls them Medeberries. Fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.145.130 (talk) 16:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Berry pleydell
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Berry pleydell, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * No assertion of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rettetast (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Stella McCusker
A tag has been placed on Stella McCusker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GeneralAtrocity (talk) 17:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Craic
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Craic. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Craic. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Ben Lyon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hi, Gang! (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Follow Me Up to Carlow
Thanks for adding "removed 'hades' mispronunciation (embarrassingly true, but not relevant for this entry)." when removing my comment about it. That made me laugh! Fair enough, I'm not inclined to argue that one. :) Peyre (talk) 22:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blue line (bell ringing)


The article Blue line (bell ringing) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article has been a stub for the last 6 years, it has never been improved. All the material on this page is also reproduced on Method ringing, which used to have the only link here. No redirects point here, they would be better pointing to Method ringing in any case.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 12:18, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of "Tonight at seven thirty"


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on "Tonight at seven thirty" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... disco spinster   talk  15:34, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)