User talk:Corrado72

Disambiguation link notification for February 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Management, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Responsibility. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Tagged edits as minor edits
Greetings. With this note I'd like to ask that you please not tag almost all of your edits as "minor edits." As noted on this page, WP:HEP — "A check to the 'minor edit' box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the version with your edit and the previous version: typo/grammar corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content, etc. A minor edit is a version that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." This page has further information that may be useful WP:MINOR Thank you.FFM784 (talk) 00:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I have no appreciation of your interventions on my edits, first of all if I mark as 'minor' some contributions like simply wikifying some terms (which I usually do in order to make easier for the casual reader to delve into topics that may be interesting but unfamiliar, without compelling the reader to enter the text in the search bar but instead relying on the very core function of a wiki) and I do respect the general rules published in the Wikipedia proper sections, I feel unappropriate to invade my activity. I never used unappropriate language nor I intentionally violated any of the rules in such a way to earn me a reprimand. And if I add a section in an existing page linking to the contents of another existing page, I find ill-mannered to have it completely deleted without any prior discussion. If Wikipedia is to become a space for bully and vandalic behaviours like this then I am going to quit supporting it and I'll seriously consider before providing any more funding (I have been actively supporting it with real world money in the last 10 years...). Corrado72 (talk) 19:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * It is not appropriate under Wikipedia's policies to suggest that my edits constitute "facisist behaviors" as you have done in your comment above. Please review WP:TPNO before making additional comments on any Wikipedia Talk page.


 * I reverted your recent edit to the IBM 5100 article because a citation was not provided to support the text that you added to the article. As noted in WP:CITE, "Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space." In my experience over the past ten or so years I have observed that it is not uncommon for editors to simply revert someone's edit, as I did, when a citation is needed but has not been provided. If you feel that a citation is not needed then I would suggest that you place a comment on the IBM 5100 talk page so that other can weigh in. Thanks.FFM784 (talk) 20:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * It was not in my intentions to offend so I have changed the prohibited word. I have to make you note that to delete completely the contribution of another editor can be interpreted as a vandalic behaviour and «absit iniuria verbis» (there is no intent to insult), in more than ten years of experience on Wikipedia I observed and appreciated that if someone deems that a citation could be necessary / appropriate then he can apply a note stating something like "citation needed" or similar and then raising a honest discussion in the talk page.Corrado72 (talk) 22:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Business analyst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liaison.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)