User talk:Craig Butz

School Project
I have some concerns about your students' projects. As a freely accessible, user-editable website, not only is it possible your students' work will be editted by other users or by each other, it has already happened. Also, it would be nice if your students used the Wikipedia conventions to link to other related topics via the tags around important words, used  and ' for italics and bolding, etc. Please see some other peoples concerns at School Project. Thanks! - UtherSRG 15:35, 21 Jan 2004 (UTC) &#x2299;

Craig, It's a simple matter to create sub-pages. One need simply make the link for where you want the page to be, then edit it. For instance, let's say we wanted to move this discussion to a sub-page of your talk page. Since your talk page is User talk:Craigbutz, I can create a sub-page at User talk:Craigbutz/School Project. After I save this edit, I can then enter into the new link and edit there. You could have a whole tree of pages off of any page: User:Craigbutz/School Projects and User:Craigbutz/School Projects/Session 1 (and Session 2, Session 3, etc) and User:Craigbutz/School Projects/Session 1/John Doe. An alternative would be for your students to create their assignements as sub-pages off of their own page. To keep track of their assignments, you could continue to keep the tree I described above (down to the Session level) and then link to your students work sub-pages from there. Many options! Use what works best for you. I think you've created a really neat project, now that I understand it better.

I'm guessing you had to prepare your students not just for writing on Wikipedia, but also the nature of writing in a public venue, as well as some Wiki elements like italics and bolding. Sub-pages can make the writing more private. One of the further benefits to using sub-pages and the (relative) privacy sub-pages engender is the ability to more slowly bring new Wiki elements in to play after some of the initial writing has begun.

Best of luck to you and your students. I do not envy the task you have set for yourself, but I think your students are luck to have you.

Sincerely, UtherSRG aka Stacey Greenstein


 * And once such a personal subpage has grown into a valid article it can be easily moved into the main namespace, with all the editing history kept - just use the "Move this page" link. andy 10:37, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I've moved the Eyebrow makeover article to your user space as it was suggested on VfD that this be deleted. If it becomes encyclopedic, you can move it back the main namespace. It is now at User:Craigbutz/Eyebrow makeover. Angela. 19:50, Jan 27, 2004 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Popularity contest


The article Popularity contest has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Popularity contest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Contest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Weeksville Dirigible Hangar


A tag has been placed on Weeksville Dirigible Hangar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AKS (talk) 18:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed revisions: Ivanpah Solar Power Facility
My name is Susan Chana and I work for an agency that represents NRG Energy. We are looking for some assistance in making some corrections and updates to the Ivanpah Solar Power Facility article. Following are some of the most important updates for you to consider:

• Article references in 1st paragraph that facility is not yet fully operational and all the solar power towers are currently operational.

• Article states in 2nd paragrah under "Description" that construction on the project was halted because it was impacting desert tortoises. The US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) said that it was not likely to impact them

• Within the "Environmental Impact" section the article references that bird deaths in 2014 will range between 1,000 and 28,000. This impact can be narrowed down and we can offer some specific #'s as the facility must report bird deaths on a monthly basis. From Jan - June 2014 the facility reported 321 bird deaths with 133 being directly related to sunlight being reflected into the boilers. A April 2014 USFWS report states that 141 birds were collected at Ivanpah last Fall and that 47 of the deaths were attributed to the boilers.

• The final sentence in the "Environmental Impacts" section is not related to Ivanpah, but to to the Palen power plant.

That is just a sampling and we are not asking that anything subjective be changed. We would only like to be sure the facts are accurate.

Thanks for your consideration.

SusanChana (talk) 18:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)SusanChana