User talk:Cray04

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Don't draftify too fast
Hi, Please wait an hour or so before draftifying articles. e.g. Draft:B8 oil field Draftification is quite jarring for new users and especially so if it is done within minutes of them creating a page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

CSD A7
Hey, what is your criteria for CSD A7 on the last few articles I've made? They all clearly pass GNG and have significant sources already on page and elsewhere on the net? I'm contesting all 3, because they definitely do not pass for Speedy deletion noms.--Ortizesp (talk) 07:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, Cray04,
 * Please stop tagging all of these football player articles as CSD A7s. Use WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead. These are not obvious CSD A7s. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 07:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)C

AfD
Hey Cray04, I noticed you cast two votes in an AfD. Just wanted to give you a heads-up that duplicate votes aren't allowed. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:27, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Which on? Cray04 (talk) 18:30, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I meant to change from weak keep to keep sorry. Cray04 (talk) 18:31, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Administrator's noticeboard
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 94.119.32.7 (talk) 08:10, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Jay Bloom moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Jay Bloom. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ― Blaze WolfTalkblaze&#95;&#95;wolf 16:03, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jay Bloom


A tag has been placed on Jay Bloom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Regards over Jay Bloom
i'm Mastashat. I have seen your recent edits on Wikipedia especially Jay Bloom. To avoid COI, please check article and source very well. Do not remove template tags unless the issue is resolved very well. If you have any question, you can ask me or you ask the Tea House. Once more... Welcome to Wikipedia. Happy editing, Best, Mastashat (talk) 00:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Ive been on wikipedia longer than you pal. You should refrain from disruptive editing and if you add a tag back it could be considered Edit warring Cray04 (talk) 06:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Jay Bloom for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jay Bloom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jay Bloom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Star  Mississippi  23:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

 * @Blablubbs So who toes died step on. btw its not aprial. Please remove this frivolous and unfair block. Cant even fathom site sometimes.... Cam we have a formal SPI atleast? I have made tons of positive contribuyiond. Whst does the block say? Cray04 (talk) 08:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Cray04 (talk) 08:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Cray04 (talk) 08:40, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @Blablubbs Cray04 (talk) 08:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You are blocked because technical evidence suggests that you are (1) the same person as and (2) deliberately trying to obfuscate that connection. The details are available for review by other checkusers. --Blablubbs (talk) 08:59, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @BlablubbsPlease please please look at my unblock request. I know this probably means nothing to you, but i've been sick to my stomach all day and unable to focus on anything but this. I have considered everything and don't know what to do outside of my unblock request. It's the best I can think of. I have no idea what the technical logs say, or indicate, so I am at a loss for possible explanations beyond what I described in my request. I thought this was a mistake at first. What can I do to prove my innocence? Cray04 (talk) 23:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Note that first unblock request smells GPTous. jp×g🗯️ 10:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

User:Jaymailsays
You've encountered her/him before. Please check out successive reversions by him of correct objective data right now at [], especially in the context of the many entries on his Talk page. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albin-Counter (talk • contribs) 01:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Distasteful Cray04 (talk) 05:16, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Cray04. Thank you for your work on Dylan Ross. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)