User talk:Crockspot/Archives/2007/November

Margery Eagan
A huge improvement, congratulations! Mayalld 09:38, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Concur – terrific job! And I'm with you on the LOL nonsense... every time I see it I picture an old lady in a housecoat smoking a cigarette and checking the lottery numbers as she sends out another "here's 15 things about me, you answer and send it back!" chain email to the three friends she has left. There oughta be a law... - Krakatoa  Katie  18:44, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)
The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 15:15, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Zeitgeist (video)
Could you please also comment on whether or not G4 was good rational seeing as how the article had been rewritten? Thank you. Pdelongchamp 00:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't see that as necessary. I tagged it, and I endorse the deletion, so it is obvious that I believe it was the proper deletion criteria. - Crockspot 00:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * A draft userspace article has been created. Please see Deletion review/Log/2007 November 8. Pdelongchamp 19:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * lol, i made the same noise about 3 minutes into the film. you're probably right about the festival.  we'll see what happens.  hopefully they don't actually swallow that tripe. Pdelongchamp 23:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Eschoir
I am somewhat surprised by the decisive action on the basis of presumption: "I'm sure that he was closely scrutinized at that time as a possible sockpuppet of FaAfA. So we can all assume that he's not FaAfA, unless some very strong and compelling evidence can be supplied to tie him to FaAfA." But I do not intend to pursue the matter. Lima 11:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Bravo
I'm very impressed by your magnanimous comments at VT's RfA. You have been most gentlemanly. Tim Vickers 22:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * He's a good kid. - Crockspot 22:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

You have nothing to be worrisome or sorry for Crock. It's what I've said and done that has caused opposition, not you. I just thought three months was long enough for my record to be clean. Maybe it's karma... Van Tucky  Talk 21:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

my RFA
  If you voted in my RFA... ...thank you for your participation. I withdrew with 83 supports, 42 opposes, and 8 neutrals. Your kind words and constructive criticism are very much appreciated. I look forward to using the knowledge I have accrued through the process to better the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers and Wikidudeman for their co-nominations. Thank you again and, best regards. Van Tucky  Talk  This RFA thanks was inspired by Lara ❤ Love's  I feel your pain, bro. - Crockspot 00:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ronn Torossian
An article that you have been involved in editing, Ronn Torossian, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. --Atavi 10:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Joel
I'll try and track him down and see if I can set something up. --David Shankbone  05:04, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Always nice to find common ground. Looking forward to further instances of the same, and thanks for the note. FeloniousMonk (talk) 03:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * My pleasure, sir. - Crockspot (talk) 03:44, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page :-)  User  Doe ☻T☼C 01:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Just returning the favor. - Crockspot (talk) 01:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Talese
Looks good. I license everything GFDL now; that must have been an old CC license one. Generally, I don't care as long as the attribution is done correctly. All the photography was meant as a "gift to the public", which is why I uploaded the highest quality possible on all of it - I didn't hold back and just upload small KB, but the full 6MB versions on most of them. People could make posters out of them if they wanted. --David Shankbone  05:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Travb
We all know that he used another account to move war the title for an article...so don't respond on my Rfc to his latest ranting and bait...especially don't check to see what he posted there before he made his adjustment...I'm just saying. That he uses his userpage to track other editors only proves we are dealing with a very childish and immature person...best to ignore him totally.--MONGO (talk) 12:05, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yep, not to mention Travb has a habit of defending disruptive users and "teaching" them how to be disruptive/manipulating through what he calls A Machiavelli view.    JungleCat    Shiny! / Oohhh!  15:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for catching that IP vandal on the Sean Hannity page. Good luck! Snowfire51 (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikinews interviews
You may be interested in commenting at Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Cool Hand Luke 21:56, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your comment about the "original research" that I "conducted" for the Talk page of Sean Hannity. Good to see that dishonest self-identification is the preferred policy of Wikipedia. Bluefield (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I speak the truth, from a Wikipedia policy perspective. You don't have to be snotty about it. - Crockspot (talk) 05:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Cram it. Bluefield (talk) 12:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)