User talk:Cybersub

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Cybersub! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! -- RP459  Talk/Contributions 03:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Talkback
-- RP459  Talk/Contributions 22:16, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- RP459  Talk/Contributions 23:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Love Me, Love Me Not (game show), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TVS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harold Shipman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Harold_Shipman check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Harold_Shipman?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for alerting me to the ITV disambiguation page link. I've corrected it now. Apologies. Cybersub (talk) 15:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Rudolph Walker
I'm afraid to tell you that despite your persistence you are wrong. In the British honours system, an honour is superseded by a higher grade within the same order. Once Walker became CBE he was no longer OBE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:09, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, yes, I understand that a CBE is higher than an OBE. However, surely the fact that Walker was also awarded the OBE should still be there after his name, if only to make people aware straight away that he hasn't just entered the honours system at CBE level. By your argument, entries for people such as Sir Elton John should also lose other honorifics after the first mention of their name.Cybersub (talk) 12:27, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The fact he was awarded the OBE first is in the text of the article. In the first line, we use the postnominals as they are actually used. Not sure what point you're making with Elton John, to be honest, as he is also described in the first line with the postnominals that are used. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:21, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

December 2019
Your addition to Father Brown (2013 TV series) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. The addition was to Father Brown (2013 TV series), but was removed from List of Father Brown episodes. -- / Alex /21  07:54, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi Alex 21. The text is not protected by any copyright. As I said in the edit summary, it was taken from the BBC Media Centre, which is free to use. Cybersub (talk) 12:12, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , hi - I was reviewing Alex 21's revdel request just now, and went to the BBC Media Centre's website. This does indeed state that the copy can be used free of charge, but if you review the section on Public Domain Sources at PLAG, you'll see that text copied from sources like this needs to be properly attributed, through the use of a citation and an attribution template in the references section of the article. Simply putting the web address in your edit summary doesn't seem like an adequate way to attribute the content. Would you be willing to address this? Girth Summit  (blether)  15:34, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , can you please show me where exactly it states that the copy can be used free of charge? Thank you. -- / Alex /21  15:35, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , at the top of the page, on the right, under 'About Program Information' - it says All copy within Programme Information can be used free of charge on condition that it credits the relevant BBC programme or service. I think that their condition that we credit them would likely be satisfied by a citation and attribution template, if properly applied; I don't think that it's satisfied by a note in an edit summary in the article's history (and nor are our policies, even if the beeb didn't make this a requirement). Girth Summit  (blether)  15:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks for your input,. Very helpful. Seems a reasonable compromise. What do you say, ? Mind you, the BBC is also supposed to be credited by media organisations for the free use of its pictures but people rarely do and it doesn't mind as it's still free publicity for its programmes :) - Cybersub (talk) 18:28, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , - I'm afraid this isn't going to fly. Since posting here last, I've had a conversation with another admin who is more fluent than I am with copyright (both with the law, and with our policies). I'm afraid that they have indicated that even with the BBC's disclaimer at the top of the page, that is not sufficient for our purposes - we can't copy and paste content from that site, even if we were to use a citation and attribution template. The Beeb would need to make a more formal statement, indicating what type of license they release the content under, before we'd be able to consider using it. So, I've gone ahead and performed Alex's requested revdel; Cybersub, please remember this for future reference, our policies require us to be very careful about copyright, and copy/pasting from the web is fraught with risk. Cheers both  Girth Summit  (blether)  18:33, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Cybersub - thinking about this a bit more, I wonder whether this is the kind of content that you've added to other articles? I 100% accept that you've been editing in good faith, and I'm not making any kind of threat of sanctions here, but if you've added content copied in this way anywhere else it will need to be removed. If so, it would be really helpful if you could put together a list of articles, so we can check and remove where necessary. Sorry to be a pain, but it's something we have to take quite seriously - any help you'd be willing to offer would be appreciated. Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  19:53, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for your messages. Sorry for the delay in replying but I've been away. Fully understand what you're saying and sincere apologies for inadvertently causing any problems. As you say - and thank you for acknowledging it - this particular content was added in good faith and was in no way intended to violate any copyright. This isn't the kind of content I usually add but I'll have a look at previous contributions for you and get back to you again asap. Best wishes - Cybersub (talk) 16:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , thanks, I appreciate that. Copyright can be tricky, and our policies are very cautious - if you do find anything that you think might not be OK, just let me know and I'll revdel the revisions. (Feel free to take a moment to paraphrase it if you like to avoid the problem, so only historic versions will need to be revdelled). Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  17:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi. I've now gone through my entire history of contributions and, as indicated earlier, can confirm that I have not written any articles or created any pages. Basically, my contributions over the years have consisted of corrections, updates and amends, none of which has been copyright-sensitive. The only thing that struck me that might now be seen as problematical was within a section that I created on animator Nick Park's Wikipedia page on 2nd December 2019 about him being a nominated 'Preston Legend' and - as such - a students' union meeting room at the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan) being named after him. Park subsequently sent UCLan a message to say how honoured he was, with UCLan publishing it on its website, and I included his message. As it's in the public domain, I believed that it was OK to use it, but bearing in mind the above discussion I've now deleted the message and simply written that Park sent UCLan a message to say how honoured he was, and I've retained the link to the source material. I am also happy to confirm that the wording of the 'Preston Legend' section is entirely mine and original. I'm going to be unavailable now for a while, sorry, but I hope that this is all satisfactory. Best wishes - Cybersub (talk) 19:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , that's all fine, and thanks for taking the time to check it's much appreciated. Happy new year! Girth Summit  (blether)  19:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)