User talk:Cyrus Azamfar

Welcome!
Hello, Cyrus Azamfar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Citing own or closely connected research
Hello, Cyrus Azamfar. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add requestedit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

GermanJoe (talk) 16:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Aside from a possible connection to the author, these additions were vague passing mentions without tangible facts about the articles' main topic. Both articles already contain a lot of applications and use cases. Adding further indiscriminate examples doesn't add any relevant information about the main topic itself. GermanJoe (talk) 16:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Industrial blockchain


The article Industrial blockchain has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not needed. Business applications of blockchains are already mentioned in Blockchain, the rest of the article is a WP:COATRACK about how blockhain might 'enhance' and 'contribute to the advancement' of Cyber Physical Systems."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Thjarkur (talk) 00:47, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Industrial blockchain for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Industrial blockchain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Industrial blockchain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Thjarkur (talk) 02:40, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

my thoughts on this
This page "industrial blockchain" has been created to motivate researchers for contributing to industrial applications of blockchain technology and more precisely focus on smart manufacturing. Although there is another page talking about blockchain in general, but smart manufacturing (or cyber-physical-system) is itself a very big industry with its own challenges and limitations. Recently GE, IBM, Mazak, P&G, etc have shown a huge interest in using blockchain in their manufacturing progress towards industry 4.0. This page would serve as a guideline that gradually would be completed and used for industrial people with the main focus on their specific needs rather than some shallow discussion on some other pages.

Sockpuppet investigation
MrOllie (talk) 01:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Blocked from editing
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Jayleecincinnati&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Jayleecincinnati. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

I dont know account jayleecincinnati and that is a totally different person. Please fix the problem and unlock my account.

Thanks