User talk:D-MF-L

Hello

Excelsior! Read comics and tip your strippers. AND NEVER BE AFRAID TO USE BOLD OR ITALIC!

May 2013
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Evanh2008 (talk&#124;contribs) 02:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Bad Editors
I want to create a page that lists editors who delete and undo for the wrong reasons. Ones that follow guidelines but think like a robot and only want to be considered "right" to the Wiki Gods. These aren't people with jobs or a life and just want to delete your contributions that frankly could be the difference of a person making a connection with 2 thoughts and being totally stuck on "WTF aren't these things the same"?

October 2013
What's the point anymore? You want to edit something? Too bad. "This page has been semi-protected so that only autoconfirmed users can edit it. If you need any help getting started with editing, see the New contributors' help page." What a joke. Get a job losers and let non d-bags edit information as it comes in. You can't use wikipedia as a credible source anyways, even if it a protected page. It was made by the people, for the people. Not by the p******, for the people. "How you can contribute Don't be afraid to edit – anyone can edit almost every page, and we are encouraged to be bold! Find something that can be improved and make it better—for example, spelling, grammar, rewriting for readability, adding content, or removing non-constructive edits. If you wish to add new facts, please try to provide references so they may be verified, or suggest them on the article's discussion page. Changes to controversial topics and Wikipedia's main pages should usually be discussed first. Remember – you can't break Wikipedia; all edits can be reversed, fixed or improved later. Wikipedia is allowed to be imperfect. So go ahead, edit an article and help make Wikipedia the best information source on the Internet"

<-- that children is what's called B.S. for 1 reason, some people believe they have more knowledge and experience in the ever growing field of READING SHIT ON THE INTERNET. Something anyone can do, and link, and cite, but these people think that if they don't do it first it isn't credible. They'll even RE-WORD your edit to make it their own. They're dicks. God forbid someone needs to update Batman: Arkham Origins or Arrow with facts these a-holes don't know about. Basically it's politics being added to a free community, which is kind of like taking orders from this guy.