User talk:Daniel Case/Archive 9/25/2006-2/12/2007

Re: Experimenting?
Hi Daniel, I recently deleted some vandalism on the Anna Wintour page, and you sent me a message saying that I was experimenting and that it had been reverted. All I did was delete random nasty comments people were leaving about Anna Wintour being a "whore"...what's with the experimenting stuff?

Gliding
Thank you for giving Gliding good article status. I will make the changes that you suggest. How far is it from Featured Article status? I would not be able to nominate it myself, but would you be interested in doing this, after I have made any necessary changes? JMcC 12:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

I have self-nominated it as a featured article candidate. If you would still like to second the proposal, your support would be welcome. JMcC 11:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the copy edit and the provisional support. You said that there was one fact that you would like cited. Would you let me know what it was? I will then look for it. JMcC 06:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Many thanks for the copy edit. I could quibble with a couple, but in general the improvements are beneficial. Yes, my first language is English, and as an author, it is usually quite good. (I get upset about misused apostrophes and 'less' instead of 'fewer'). However, it is always much easier to start with a clean sheet of paper or with a freash viewpoint. I found I could read and re-read drafts of my book, but it needed my editors to point out some glaringly obvious changes. This limitation may be peculiar to me. If you can change to full support, it would be appreciated. At present the article is being ignored. If there is anything else I can do, let me know. Thank you once again. 13:35, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Daniel. Sorry to post another message to you so soon. You said that "Basically, it comes down to some places where we could go a little further with what we have." Please, just tell me where. I have moved stuff about gliders to Glider and more detail about competitions to another article that is still very much work in progress called Gliding competitions. This is to keep the main article to a manageable size. JMcC 17:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you again for your latest edits and comments. I think I have adopted all your suggestions with the exception of the illustration of the On-Line Contest. This is not visually appealing and so I have not included an image from a screen capture. As ever comments are welcome but a change from provisional support would now also be most welcome. JMcC 23:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Daniel, I have loaded a new photo (and I think a better one) rather than waiting for a response about the previous photo which used an old tag. JMcC 20:06, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

One area where another pair of eyes would help would be in checking consistency of spelling. I have tried to standardize on US spelling because that was the way the article had been started. However it is easy for me to drop into British spelling. JMcC 22:39, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for helping Gliding get to Featured Article status. I have learned a lot from you and other reviewers that will help in future work. JMcC 08:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer. I was wondering how the article of the day was chosen. I cannot think of a significant day for gliding in the near future. The earliest date would be George Cayley's birthday but this is not until 27 December. Any day would therefore be fine. JMcC 07:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know about the appearance on Thursday of Gliding as a featured article. JMcC 13:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Archiving
Hi Daniel, I can see you are an advanced Wikipedia user. Can you please help me to restore and archive my talk page? It seems I accidentally vandalized by deleting it. Cutter20 07:21, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the assistance with the Turnitin page. Cutter20 22:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue V - October 2006
The October 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 20:34, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Snowshoer packing skis.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Snowshoer packing skis.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nilfanion (talk) 23:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * A Creative Commons license allows the copyright holder to change the license at any time (including to All Rights Reserved). However, any copies created from the image whilst it was CC licensed are always available under CC - even if the creator's license is altered. This is a particular problem with Flickr imagery, as their licenses can be easily altered and there is no record to prove if it was ever freely available. On this particular image I can see no CC licensing (though I might be missing it), its possible that it was licensed freely, but it is also possible that it was never, and without proof its better to err on the cautious side (ie deletion).--Nilfanion (talk) 15:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

CM Punk up for FA
Since your passing of the article as GA I and other editors have worked overtime to improve it and I self-nominated it for Featured Article status. Since the GA passing the number of sources has doubled, I have combined several sections to incorporate the trivial Tattoos section into a prose analysis of the gimmick, which also used parts of the headers, and have expanded on the prose in the article. If you would like to take a second look it would be much appreciated. This is a side by side comparison of the article when it passed GA and what it looks like now. –– Lid(Talk) 15:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

CfD heads up...
You wrote&mdash; Just thought I'd let you know that I listed Category:Companies based in Orange County, New York, which you created, for deletion. My reasons are there. If you wish to justify its continued existence, please do. Daniel Case 04:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Time has obviated the percieved need for the category. I support deletion. Thanks for the courtesy of notification. Williamborg (Bill) 05:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

New Coke
Well I would like to thank you for such a brilliant article! I greatly enjoyed reading it and as I wasnt around to witness this great milestone in the history of Coca-Cola I also found it extremely educational. Thanks again, *bj* 11:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Devil wears Prada Review
Hi Daniel, could you explain to me why you removed my link to the review page on this movie? In the log you call it a spam link, but it's simply a reference to my movie review web log exactly the same as the link directly above it is. What makes my link spam? -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.194.12.240 (talk • contribs) 15:39, November 1, 2006

Just to let you know, I've reverted all of the additions that the above user made to various film articles. --Erik ( talk/contrib ) @ 19:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Your answer is clear and I'm sorry I caused you that much extra work reverting all the changes. I assumed it was ok and it would be valued to add a link to just another review, but appearently it's not. No sweat, but it might be a good idea to put some kind of notice at every page's edit link, so people get an idea of what's appreciated and what not before they do all their work... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.194.12.240 (talk • contribs)

Might want to watch that talk page humor -- that stuff's public, you know. :) --Erik ( talk/contrib ) @ 20:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Appreciate the time and effort you guys put into this, Wikipedia rulez ;-)

The Ulster County navbox
Thanks for putting that in the remaining town articles. Where comes your interest in the area? It isn't apparent from your user page.

Or were you just trying to be helpful after seeing all those repetitive edits on my part? Daniel Case 20:22, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't know Ulster County from Uriah Heep;-) I noticed the vandalism on the New Paltz page so I decided to check the articles on other towns in the area, so while I was at it I stuck in some of the missing infoboxes. I think the same vandal(s) went after some articles on Chicago or Mexico, that's probably how I wound up checking up on New Paltz. Why would anyone have a beef with New Paltz? I can understand Pancho Villa and Taco getting hit a lot.. Tubezone 20:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VI - November 2006
The November 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Alice Sebold.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Alice Sebold.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Chowbok 16:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

The Devil's Tree
Oh that's good however, I was wondering is the Devil's Tree actually in Martinsville, New Jersey? Cause I been there and I believe it is actually located in Basking Ridge. Valoem  talk  22:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

The Highlands, or whatever it is
I took that with a phone. I've never gotten into any issues uploading pictures I took with it, especially in the quality department. So much for that. And sorry for the typo. It happens sometimes. And you have your wish, I'll stay away from the Hudson Valley. Pacific Coast Highway {Gobble Gobble! • Happy Thanksgiving!} 18:51, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

deletionism
I don't think you're actually a deletionist; everything you advocate deleting is pretty much incontrovertibly against policy to begin with. It takes advocating deletion in more borderline cases to really be one. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 17:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Harry McNeish
I added some changes to Harry McNeish since you rated it a start quality. Please re-rate the quality of Harry McNeish. Thanks. --Jreferee 06:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Larry Csonka old.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Larry Csonka old.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  howch e  ng   {chat} 17:21, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Fair use paranoia
All I can say at this point is, I wish editors were as gung-ho in tagging and/or removing copyvios before the change... ;) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 18:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Changes made to Action Park (not by me!)
Hey Daniel! Someone tagged Action Park because of the use of a YouTube video. Just today, someone else removed the tag and the link to the YouTube video. I didn't feel capable of taking up the discussion of the issue with whoever this is, but I do tend to feel that that particular video should be OK to keep, especially since GAR is out of business and there's some possibility that the copyright in its Action Park commercials has lapsed. You might wish to pursue this issue further. Thanks. --Tkynerd 19:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC) -- Good! I think it's important for Wikipedia to steer clear of legal issues by being careful about the use of copyrighted material, but I also think Wikipedia should be somewhat aggressive about fair use. :-) Thanks. --Tkynerd 15:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Cleese pic at Commons
Daniel Case wrote:
 * I had plenty of stuff on the author (Alan Light at Flickr), but I'd forgotten a license tag (cc-by-2.0). Is that what you wanted? I've got it now. Daniel Case 05:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Yep, that's fine. Sorry if it comes across as annoying, but it's essential that images have proper licensing information – Gurch 05:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Guilty Pleasures
You recently disputed the fair use status of with the reason that it should not be used in the main Barbra Streisand article. I uploaded this image to illustrate the album article Guilty Pleasures (Barbra Streisand album), as described on the image page. I agree that the image should not be used to illustrate the main Barbra Streisand article, however, the image should not be deleted, as it is needed for the album article.

I propose removing the image from the main Barbra Streisand article. The image must remain for the album article, where it is allowed to be. --Daniel Lawrence 15:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Spyware FAR
I have closed the review for now because it is common practice to allow some time to articles recently featured on the main page before nominating for FAR. The reasons for this are: to allow time for the article to stabilize, and to allow for concerns to be resolved on the talk page. Joelito (talk) 14:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Just wait until the smoke clears, usually a week. In the meantime try to motivate yourself and other editors into improving the article. Joelito (talk) 14:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Rondout Reservoir
Hi, is this where to contact you? My attempt on the Rondout Reservoir page was a bit ham-handed, I admit, but I'm trying to improve. You do an amazing job on Wikipedia. I can't imagine how much time you must devote, but I'm sure it's a lot.

Regarding the quote by the DEP employee regarding the "f---ing ignoramouses": I know for a fact that while the quote is accurate, it was NOT said to the THR in response to the forged inspection report controversy. The THR editor who worked on that story (Joe Dowd) had a personal disagreement with the employee and crafted the story to make it seem as if that was the DEP's reaction to the controversy. If you go back and read the original THR story about the issue you'll see the very ambiguous language that was used to describe the timing of that quote:

http://archive.recordonline.com/archive/2006/01/17/news-gbnycdams(live)-01-17.html

The section is as follows:

''"I can already see exactly what this story ... is going to look like," Michaels said at one point. "It's going to be written by a bunch of (expletive) ignoramuses, and it's going to be done in such a way as to make us look as bad as possible."''

When the THR writes "said at one point," that is their way of confusing the issue to make it seem like that response was to the news of the inspection reports. But it was not. It was said in response to another item the THR was asking about, and then inserted in that article to satisy a particular editor. If the comment was made in response to the forged inspection reports you can be sure the THR would not have used that kind of vague language. And when they insert the ellipses (sp? the three dots) that's to skip over the topic that the employee was addressing with the quote. (As in, "I can already see what this story about flooding is going to look like")

I am not aware of any encyclopedia that prints as true statements it reads in one single newspaper. Also, your inclusion on the page of the phrase "allowed himself to be quoted" is a clear sign of an editorial judgement on your part that should not be part of any encyclopedia.

Thanks for your attention to this matter.

BTW, here's the THR story that's the citation for the engineering reports showing that the dams are in fact safe:

http://archive.recordonline.com/archive/2006/02/21/news-gbjgdamsreports-02-21.html

I still don't think newspaper articles should be sources for encyclopedia articles, but there it is.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Catskills map
Yea, I had seen that several pages had similar requests for a map showing where a region was in relation to other regions, like the Catskills, Poconos, Berkshires, Green Mountains, etc etc. Not having the time to make different maps for each, I figured I could at least make one that covered the region and could be used on these various pages. But being multi-purpose like that, and needing to be readable in limited pixel space, I used the letter-key thing, realizing it is suboptimal. But, given time constraints, it was that or nothing. If I get a chance, I'll work on making individual maps. I haven't gotten a chance to add this map to the various pages it may be useful on, like the Berkshires. The Berkshires page already has a map, but only of Massachusetts. So I was not sure whether to add mine and if so, where.. So, time being short, I just left it off.. Thanks for the feedback! Pfly 02:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Kindred spirits
''Comment moved from your User page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)''

Daniel,  The Durand, "Kindred spirits" is a well known painting, but even that artist would readily admit his technical inferiority to the Cole from 1826 in the Warner Collection. "Kindred Spirits" has so many topographical faults that if one goes to Kaaterskill Falls (hard enough these days) they would not know where to look, as it is the painting equivalent of a venture into fiction. Use your eyes, compare the two, and the Cole is far more accurate and being much earlier, more colorful, it is far more important in the development of the Hudson River School. I have studied this for over twenty years and all of Cole's and Durand's peers would agree. Read the Howatt books on the Hudson River School or anything by John Wilmerding. If you want to say Church is more important, that is fine, but not Durand, despite recent headlines concerning the sale of "Kindred Spirits."

Alexander Boyle R_AlexanderBoyle@msn.com

WikiProject Steely Dan
I know this could be considered spamming, but I couldn't help noticing that you have a Steely Dan userbox. I am trying to start a Steely Dan WikiProject and was just wondering if you were interested. Come to WikiProject_Council/Proposals to sign up and visit the WikiProject-to-be's temporary page here. Nautica Shad e  s  16:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Frost Valley YMCA
I saw that you moved this article to put it in line with other YMCA articles.

I understand this, but consider that


 * Frost Valley's website itself uses "Frost Valley YMCA".
 * It is locally and regionally known as "Frost Valley YMCA."

Are other YMCA articles named this way regardless of the particular Y's official name? Daniel Case 13:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't care, name it how you want. Chris 17:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Soft drinks
This is to advise you that the above named project is currently being considered for deletion. Please feel free to follow the links or go directly to Miscellany for deletion to take part in the discussion. Thank you. Badbilltucker 15:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Created a userbox and banner for the project. As is, the banner does not permit assessment. If you want the project to do assessments, let me know and I will change it accordingly. Also, if you haven't already, the WikiProject Guide may be useful in getting a project of the ground. The original creator of the project may be gone, so you might be the one left holding the bag here. Sorry about that. If you think I can be of any help, let me know, and I'll do what I can to help. Best of luck. Badbilltucker 19:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * You have no idea how much I symphasize with you regarding not being able to follow up. I've basically created several projects myself just so that we could get a few more articles assessed so that wikipedia could know the relative status of a lot of them. I'm currently going through all the dogs articles to ensure that they at least have the banner, and then I'm going back to the Germany project to assess their articles. After that, I've got Radio Stations, Religion, Africa, Canada, Italy, France, and Munich to get through. However, as none of these assessments are really a priority, I will have time to try to help a little with the soft drinks project. If you want any sort of help regarding setting up the project (I am fairly good at that by this point) let me know and I'll do what I can. Badbilltucker 23:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Are You Originally From Summit, NJ?
Hi Dan,

I grew up in Summit, NJ and knew a kid in my grade school (Brayton)named Daniel Case, born in 1968. Just wondering if you are the same person. My name is John Coviello.

I was adding to the Passaic River article and noticed you were the last one to add to it.

John

Derivative works of copyrighted products
Thanks for creating the proposal Replaceability of fair-use images. I fully agree. One issue should possibly covered. I do not know if I want to bring this up on the talk page, as it will only make things more complicated.

Designer items including furniture, kitchenware, and buildings may be covered by copyright. The United States does not have panorama freedom like Germany and some other contries. It may therefore be impossible to create free images of widely marketed products or public places.

Some examples:
 * 1) I have been using a set of pressed glass tumblers in everyday use for the last 15 years. This set is marketed in Finland at low prices in discount stores, including Anttila, our verson of Sears. The set was originally desiged by Aino Aalto, first wife Alvar Aalto, who died in 1949. On my last visit to New York I noticed that the glasses were for sale at the gift shop of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, This particular week they were on promotion at 25% of the regular price. I took photos of the display stand with the SALE sign, and posted them to Wikimedia Commons. Two weeks later, I noticed that they had been deleted the next day! The criteria for deletion is stated in Commons:Derivative works. Although the I did not argee with the application of the guidlines in this particular case, I decided not to reupload the images.
 * 2) A picture of Fifth Avenue outside the Guggenheim Museum on commons was also requested for deletion. The picture was saved only by the fact that the building is from before 1990. (See:Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Guggenheim museum exterior.jpg)

If photograps of these objects really can not be free, then by the replaceability criteria we could claim fair use for any images. There does not seem to be any legal incentive to use user generated images. The lesson: If they do not let us photograph their products, then we have the moral right to use their promotional images. (As an example I used this as a fair use rational for Image:Knoll - Eero Saarinen pedestal chairs.jpg.) -- Petri Krohn 03:46, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

P.S. If you think that this issue should be discussed now, feel free to move this comment to Wikipedia talk:Replaceability of fair-use images -- Petri Krohn 03:46, 22 November 2006 (UTC)


 * (Moved from User talk:Petri Krohn)
 * Are you saying, that even though these images were not allowed on Commons, they would be accepted as GFDL on the English Wikipedia? Is this because there is genuinely a difference on derivative work on Commons and En? Or is this because there is less copyright paranoia on En?
 * Anyway, this still leaves us material that cannot be free content, even on the English Wikipedia, and therefore should fall under non-replaceability. --Petri Krohn 05:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Gliding
Daniel, if you believed there were sentences that were badly phrased, you merely had to point these out to me during the FAC process. It is a little late now to start apologising for the article, especially as no apology is needed. JMcC 09:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Coke
A lot of the protests against New Coke specifically referred to it's taste (i.e. a lot of people insisted that they preferred the taste of the original coke). The protests weren't exclusively (and probably not even mainly) against the very idea of changing coke. But of course without a reference to cite, I don't think we can really say one way or another. Kaldari 02:30, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Steven Boone
Could you add some background regarding this change to the discussion on Talk:Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search. Cheers, John Vandenberg 01:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

fair use proposal
I think you'll find that I already commented on your proposal about a week ago. I largely agree with it, at any rate. john k 06:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * People considered recluses would be better, though still not ideal. How about "Individuals who purposefully evade the public eye" or something? --tjstrf talk 01:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Because "recluse" is generally derogatory in connotation. Therefore it is best to avoid using it except in cases where you intend to define its proper meaning alongside it in the text. --tjstrf talk 04:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Image deletion
Hey again, Daniel. I think you can delete all those images you listed at Images and media for deletion/2006 December 4 with a simple db-g7 tag if you are the only one who has modified them.

Given any thoughts recently to that old offer to run for adminship?--Kchase T 21:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that's what occurred to me after I put those all up.


 * I have given the adminship thing more thought and am leaning more closely to it now that I've been doing more RCP, but let's wait until at least January. Daniel Case 02:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Meetup
I know it's short notice if this is the first you've heard of it, but have you considered attending this? Looks like we're going to have a pretty good turnout. Kafziel Talk 17:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Hmm, looks interesting, I might want to bring my son. Would you be interested in sharing transportation? How are you planning to get into the city?


 * Also, I'm sorry your recent bid for adminship failed. Let me know and I'll come out and support you next time (and there will be a next time). Daniel Case 05:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Anna Wintour.jpg
Hello Daniel Case, sorry, but I am unable to see the change in license from cc-by-nc-nd-2.0 ro cc-by-2.5. It is still non-commercial and non-derivative license, which propmotes for speedy-deletion. It will have to be deleted, please try to fine free-images to retain the images. These types of images could be legal warnings for wikimedia. Regards, Shyam  ( T / C ) 19:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi Daniel Case, I am very sorry for bothering you. But I did not see the comments by author. I generally go through the license which was released at the time of upload. I could not see the submitted comments. Thanks for your efforts. I had made comments on the commons file. It could be better if you post some comments which was mailed by the author to you. If this screenshot is not useful anymore, then could it be deleted? Regards, Shyam  ( T / C ) 21:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Discussion of fair-use policy amendment
Actually, that's not the part of the policy (enforcement and exceptions) I object to... I object to the first sentence of criterion #1. I gather it's probably much older than the amendment. The amendment gives teeth to the policy, which I think would be fine, if the policy itself were fine, but it's not. Perhaps the best way to go about it is to propose a new addition to the exceptions section of the policy. Let me mull it over. VoiceOfReason 14:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

White Deer Hole Creek
Thanks for your support and praise at Featured article candidates/White Deer Hole Creek. The next time I am feeling low about the Wiki I will read your kind words and feel much better again. As I said, please let me know your concerns or suggestions for improvement and I will do my best to address them. Yours, Ruhrfisch 20:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much for your hard work and copyedits. I have a picture of a bunker. I can try to get a photo of the source in the spring. I have never seen any discharge figures and there is no USGS gauge (or even a County flood warning gauge) on the creek. Very briefly I am fine with all but two of the edits. 1) The archeology was done prior to construction (it was a 6+ acre farm field before it was a sewage treatment plant). 2) There are two kinds of trails - those that are multi use, and those that are dedicated to just snowmobiling or xc skiing. I would like to discuss these more, but I need to respond to an Oppose on the FAC first. I am putting this here as well as the article talk page. Ruhrfisch 04:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006
The December 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:23, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

My apologies
For some reason I didn't catch your earlier reply to me. I just noticed it now, and I'm sorry I missed you. I ended up taking the train from Harriman. Sorry again - maybe next time! Kafziel Talk 14:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, there's one in April. That gives us lots of time to plan. (Harriman? Given the location, you'd have been better off going across the river instead. From where I live, I always go to Beacon to catch the train (But if I did have to go to Lower Manhattan, I would go to Campbell Hall instead).


 * How was it? I could just read the page, but first-person accounts are always more interesting.


 * We should think about planning a Hudson Valley meetup at some point.


 * Don't feel bad about missing my reply ... usually when you have multiple edits taking place to a talk page, you only see the last one when you check your watchlist. Daniel Case 14:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It was pretty neat. Nice to be able to put faces with names of people I've been working with for so long, like Crazy Russian and Uncle Ed. Some of the conversations were a little over my head, since I focus more on writing articles than writing code and stuff, but it was interesting all the same.
 * Ever since Secaucus Junction opened, I take the train from Harriman to Penn Station. I never drive to Dutchess, Putnam, or Westchester if I can help it. I don't know why; I've driven across the country four times and I've been to five continents, but I've only been to Poughkeepsie twice in my life. Kafziel Talk 15:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Good News!
Thanks especially for the barnstar, which is very much appreciated and my first actual barnstar (I already had a 'donut star'). I had only looked at current USGS and Lycoming County gauges, but after your comments I searched some more and found out there was a USGS gauge near Elimsport until 1994. The page on the web only gives stage and discharge for two floods, one of them Hurricane Agnes. I will contact USGS and see if I can get the average discharge. The problem is that the gauge is pretty far upstream and so is not the total discharge. Any ideas on estimating or otherwise finding discharge at the mouth?

If discharge can be added, I want to get that in there before nominating the article for the main page. I took the latitude and longitude out for the source as well (since it is in the template now) and want to make it "...farms (many Amish)." in the lead as the farms are not primarily Amish. Are these edits OK with you?

I also want to look at Larrys Creek and clean it up some based on what I learned here. Thanks again, Ruhrfisch 17:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The bunker picture is already in the article at the very bottom (I took it a little over a week ago, before FAC, mostly for a short article on the Susquehanna Ordnance Depot I will write at some point). Cove Road runs within a short distance of the WDHC source, so I should be able to find the source and get a photo of it. The infobox picture is one of my favorites. I submitted it to WP:PPR to see if it could be a featured image, but they had technical issues with it (blown highlights, slight blur as it is a hand held shot in lowish light). I went back there this fall to try and get a picture with colored leaves, but the creek water level was lower and the leaf colors were mostly yellows and it was just not as inviting or lush a picture. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 19:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

The Miracle at the Meadowlands
Thanks for asking for that cite ... not only did I put it in, I decided to start the long-overdue task of making all the references into specific footnotes. Daniel Case 04:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Don't mention it—you never know how people will react to citation requests. I feel they help make this fascinating article even better. Keep up the good work. —xanderer 18:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your kind words. With a lot digging and three emails to the USGS I found some discharge data for Larrys Creek and White Deer Hole Creek and have added discharge information to both articles (infobox and Geology section). Since I am just a chemist ;-) if you would take a look and make sure I have not written anything dumb I would appreciate it. Thanks for asking about it - it got me digging again.

I am honored and glad that the articles I mostly wrote are an inspiration. It looks like there is a lot of information already there for Slide Mountain. I just skimmed it - looks like it could use more inline citations. If you want me to look it over at some point on the road to FA I would be glad to (and I have AndyZ's Peer Review script if you ever want that run). Your photos are very nice by the way - especially the Shawangunk Kill infobox shot. As for other stream articles being improved, I know Paulins Kill is a work in progress on its way (hopefully) to FA (I helped a lot with its Peer Review).

I had thought about writing about Bald Eagle Mountain and plan to help User:Dhaluza with the article s/he has started at some point (beat me to it). I could also write a little article about White Deer Ridge (North and South) as I learned about it writing WDHC. Other than that I am not sure there are any mountains I know well enough to write about (and I am stumped for lakes).

Being a nitpicker, I have two final questions (both on WDHC). 1) Can I revert the last sentence in the lead to "...farms (many Amish)." from your edit of "...farms (primarily Amish)."? I think of primarily as meaning mostly / majority, and the only data I have does not support that (although driving around Elimsport on Sunday there are many Amish out for rides and strolls). 2) Second lead paragraph now reads "...28.4% of the watershed given to agriculture and 71.6 percent...". I think it should be consistent - both "%" (how I wrote it) or probably better, both "percent" (someone's edit of one %). What do you think? Thanks again, Ruhrfisch 01:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Warren Moon playing football.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Warren Moon playing football.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ++ aviper2k7 ++ 04:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

NYSR-NYCR Newsletter - Issue 1

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.  T M F Let's Go Mets - Stats 06:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Featured topic: Solar System
I reverted you addition of Enceladus (moon) to the Solar system featured topic. To add an item to a featured topic it has to be nominated first. There so happens to be a nomination that just started to get sun and moon onto the list. I'll see if I can add Enceladus to it. Be sure to vote. --Arctic Gnome 20:48, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Navigation Template
Just so you know, you will not have to make a navigation tenplate for New York City water supply. I have just made one a few hours ago. It does need a few articles made so that there aren't so many red links on it, but it's coming through fine. You can see it here. --Kschwerdt514 22:59, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, I just felt that someone should do it, and I decided that it would be me. Btw, i do like the Shandaken Tunnel picture. Oh, and thanks for reminding me about going instead of typing out the entire template name. That'll save me time. --Kschwerdt514 15:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to the Films WikiProject!
 Welcome! Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add User WikiProject Films to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for November has been published.  December's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia.  Check it out!
 * Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Cbrown1023 20:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Newsletter
The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use of promotional photographs
Hi Daniel,

Sorry to interrupt your talk page. But please consider voting on whether to allow the fair use of promotional photographs of living people.

Cedars 22:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Dutch Reformed Church (Newburgh, New York)
Regarding the image, I think the original (with one restored column), would make a good illustration for the latest section. What do you think? Circeus 21:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The original is technically still available as a previous version. It would be easy to download and reupload with a different name. Circeus 00:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, I've just dropped it off my watchlist (I'm trying to maintain it on a diet so i can actually keep up with it). By now it's probably simpler that I just be bold and do it myself lol. Good luck on getting it to FA. I'm myself eventually aiming for that with Common Mullein. Circeus 03:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Michael Kudish thanks
Thanks for wikifying my Michael Kudish page. I was going to get around to it later. Wanted to get the page there first. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RussNelson (talk • contribs) 05:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC).


 * Gosh, I haven't actually seen Mike in a coon's age. Don't have any photos of him.  We were supposed to get together last summer, but it didn't pan out.  I think I'll just have to make a pilgrimage to his new place in the Catskills. RussNelson 16:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

RE:Catskill bodies of water
I'm very sorry about that. It's just that I had been planning to make a List of reservoirs and dams in New York page for a long time (which I have just done), so that there didn't need to be so many New York reservoir articles in these categories. But if I'm not supposed to or don't have to, then I guess I'll put the categories back. --Kschwerdt514 03:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

leanto
''Comment moved from your User page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)''

Hi, Dan, I would like to collaborate with you on a Catskill's leanto page. I have been supervising the leanto's since 1992 and i don't have a lot of history on them, such as when they were established and for why. I have some information on DEC policy for various years and have been consulted by DEC for a few lean-to replacement projects. ElieAdknam 05:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Bernhard Schlink
Sorry I wasn't logged on. It may have been true at the time of the writing, but as of now he's one of Germany's most prominent constitutional scholars as well as the author of a prominent commentary as well as a prominent textbook on constitutional rights, teaching at Humboldt University, next to which I live. I'm pretty sure he isn't working in a judicial function right now. If that article was mostly yours, I salute you. It's excellent. Weasel 06:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Michael Kudish photo
I have a recent photo of Dr. Mike, taken in the Spring '06. Please tell me where and how to upload it; thanks, Elie Adknam 11:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Blackhead Range
You wrote a comment on the Blackhead Range being see as far off as Albany and it's subarbs. You may want to update tit with the following information. On a clear day, the range is also visible from open summits in the souther Adirondacks such as Prospect Mtn and the Hadley Mt. firetower. It's truly impressive to view this range from eighty miles to the north. Conversely, on a clear day, one can discern the southern Adirondacks from some of the north facing views on the Blackhead Range as well as from Windham High Peak. Thank you, Elie Adknam 11:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Panther Mountain (New York), was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  21:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006
The January 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Action Park looping water slide.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Action Park looping water slide.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 16:05, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Looping water slide picture
Hey Daniel, good work in getting that picture into the article. However, I think it should go into the looping water slide section of the article, much farther down, rather than at the top. My feeling is that having it right at the top makes the rest of the article...well...somewhat anticlimactic. Just a thought. Best regards, --Tkynerd 23:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Srebrenica Massacre
Daniel, you've added an FAOL to the Srebrenica Massacre article referring to Massaker von Srebrenica. I've Searched for but not been able to find the German article. Can you send me the URL? Thanks --Opbeith 10:48, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for sending the link but I'm not having much luck with it I'm afraid. I don't know whether the German Wikipedia just doesn't like Netscape but my browser just gets closed down everytime I get close. --Opbeith 18:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

NYSR-NYCR Newsletter - Issue 2

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. -- T M F Let's Go Mets - Stats 22:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:John_Hall.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:John_Hall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hbdragon88 05:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * What am I supposed to do? It says "Do not remove this tag," and I assume that includes me, as well.  Also, f'ing awesome timing - I just moved my user talk page and was recreating it when I saw your message. Hbdragon88 05:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I was the one who tagged it; because, as you mentioned, he is elected (in office now as well) and I was assuming that the Congress one was going to be availalbe or already was. Hbdragon88 05:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Coca-Cola peer review request
Hello Daniel Case, you have indicated that you are a member of the Soft Drinks WikiProject. Can you please peer review Coca-Cola here. Thank you in advance.--Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 13:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Pymatuning Lake
Hi Daniel, as a member of WikiProject Lakes, could you look at Pymatuning Lake? User:Dincher wrote it, and I will do some copyedits next, but am not sure what the standard lake style, etc. are and would appreciate it if you could look it over. If you can't, let me know and I will ask at the Lakes talk page. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 02:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much - I will put it on the Lakes talk page next. Ruhrfisch 19:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Stewart
Hi Dan: I'm know I'm in your backyard. But you shouldn't have nuked all my corrections. The article is horrible for a major NYC airport. I'm not going to get into a revert war with you. Look through them and maybe add back what needs to be there.

BTW this wikipedia thing has really sucked me out of my ownwebsite. ;-) Americasroof 02:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not going to get into a pissing war -- especially with a highpointer. You really, really, really should read my edits before nuking them wholesale.  For what's it worth, I actually expanded the Space Shuttle comment since the runway is second biggest in the metro area.  But then you've nuked apparently without reading.  Americasroof 02:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks Dan for the rv. I spent more time on this than I intended.  I started incrementally making changes and that's always a problem so I dropped it into the sandbox and my edit looked more substantial.  I wondered in to see what the fuss was after the Port Authority announcement.  I've written a lot of airport articles.  The diagrams are defacto what all the big airports use and they are very useful (e.g., illuminiating just how enormous that little airport is).  I don't feel passionately about the airport but hopefully moved it a bit.  When the airport fanatics for the other airports can wind of it there may be a lot of revisions if the airport takes off!  Americasroof 02:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Crowley Foods logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Crowley Foods logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:Films Newsletter
The January 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Nehrams2020 07:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
I see that you have put 165.138.103.250 on wp:aiav, thanks, you saved me a job! let me know how it goes, best regards, 1B6 13:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Anna Wintour
Not a big deal to take it out; thanks for contacting me, though! I won't revert. --DavidShankBone 20:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Weird NJ cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Weird NJ cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Orphan tag removed. BJ Talk 03:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

The Colts weren't the first home domed team to win the Super Bowl
Did you forget The Greatest Show on Turf? They won the Super Bowl, six years ago. --J. Nguyen 03:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Sexual objectification
I submitted a photo to sexual objectification of women in panties heels and nothing else vacuuming; it's of a fashion show by Imitation of Christ, a well-known label. Several editors want NO images on the page, but I think this one is pretty clear: at a fashion show, these topless models vacuuming in heels shows women objectified sexually. Could you interject with your opinion please? Talk:Sexual_objectification--DavidShankBone 04:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Novels newsletter : Issue IX - February 2007
The February 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 16:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Complaint by User:82.37.73.31
Daniel, you recently reverted an edit of mine, stating that it was a joke edit, on "Speech Application Programming Interface". My edit was actually true in that typing 'jup' many times into Microsoft Speech crashes your computer. This is a known glitch and I would appreciate if you would not in future discard this as nonsense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.37.73.31 (talk • contribs)

First, don't tell me what to do. Second, I really can't imagine that Microsoft intended such a thing to crash your computer - therefore I would class that as a glitch. Third, I placed the edit conveniently inside the ‘Glitch’ section that was present at the time – seems kind of sensible to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.37.73.31 (talk • contribs)

Biography of living persons adminship
"Biography of Living Persons Administrators ("BLP Admins") carry out a specialized, narrowly tailored administrative role within Wikipedia." Please see WP:BLPADMIN to offer your thoughts on this proposal. CyberAnth 03:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on MacKenzieHeartsu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  W odu p  05:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Mackenzie mad about her gift.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mackenzie mad about her gift.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Bride Has Massive Hair Wig Out, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions!  Nish kid 64  15:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop
Please read Avoid neologisms and stop. Thank you. --NE2 19:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * "Multiplex" is a neologism, since it has not been defined by any reliable sources. Using it is akin to using a definition in the Urban Dictionary. --NE2 20:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi! Writing letters to dictionaries isn't going to work any better than adding them into Wiktionary: they work the same way we do (or we, being a dictionary work the same way as they ;-): on independent print citations (including durable internet publications). No dictionary is a vehicle for coining words; we document words in use, after a span of time that irritates most people (at least 1-2 years).


 * If these terms are common roadgeek usage, they should appear in the print fanzines and be easy to cite, no? Robert Ullmann 14:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Then you can provide citations? Robert Ullmann 14:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

WP:USRD Newsletter Issue 1

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.  V 6 0  VTalk · VDemolitions 20:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Spam
I was trying to share travel columns about specific locations with potentially interested readers. I am now aware that this is apparently inappropriate, not because of your threats but because of the notice given to me by someone else a day before you regarding the same incident. If you want to give people the false impression of authority, you could atleast check that no other links have been posted since the first warning was read. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.192.178 (talk • contribs)