User talk:David Be

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source and Overtone, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Again, if you want to assert that common usage is incorrect, a source is absolutely required. Otherwise we just have your word to go on. '' Dicklyon (talk) 01:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

I've reverted all your other contributions, too. You may be right about certain usages being incorrect, but without a source to say so, or to say what is correct, it is really not a good idea to assert that common usage is wrong. See WP:V. Dicklyon (talk) 01:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Here is a potential set of book sources. Some of them disagree with you, it appears, but you should see if some agree, too. Dicklyon (talk) 02:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

TMI
Your edit, while in obvious good faith is just more non notable not relevant clutter on an article about a nuke reactor. I do not agree with the rest of the pop culture stuff either. I did not remove it though because I did not see it, I was going recent changes when your edit popped up. But mostly because pop culture sections are discouraged. - 4twenty42o (talk) 02:50, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Need your help.
Since you commented on Talk:Pi of pi, I was hoping that you might do something. Please read User:Tazerdadog/Tau_(Proposed_mathematical_constant) and User_talk:Tazerdadog/Tau (Proposed mathematical constant) and show how you feel. John W. Nicholson (talk) 04:20, 23 February 2013 (UTC)