User talk:DavisJune

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Fortune cookie. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fortune_cookie&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 07:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Welcome and here's an Invite

 * }

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Tide  rolls  03:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I am convinced that you will not cease your disruption of the discussion at Talk:The Dark Knight Rises. Your block will expire before the article protection so you may return to the discussion if you so desire.  If you bring your previous off-topic commentary and personal attacks to the discussion longer block periods will follow.  Tide  rolls  03:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * If you remove this block notice from this talk page again while you are blocked, your ability to edit this page will be removed. This is your second chance. B  music  ian  05:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for Personal attacks while blocked. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the unblock mailing list at . — G FOLEY   F OUR!  — 01:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Your recent editing history at The Dark Knight Rises shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kuru  (talk)  01:30, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Please consider if you wish to continue contributing to this website
Comments such as this, this, this, and this are completely unacceptable, full stop.

Edits like this demonstrate a complete unwillingness to collaborate at all. This is not an edit war - it is a single user, you, repeatedly reverting multiple other users even though many attempts have been made to engage you in discussion. You do not own that page. I counted no fewer than four users who have undone your changes. As someone said, you cannot simply place a proposal for suggested changes on the talk page, then unilaterally change the article and ask other people to defend leaving the page the way it was before. The onus is on you to show and defend why the article should be changed, not the other way around.

Finally, with this edit, you have violated the three-revert rule.

'''This is your final warning. If you revert the page again for any reason before obtaining consensus for your changes on the talk page, or if you make another personal attack, I will block your account for an indefinite period.'''

J.delanoy gabs adds 01:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

While you are blocked...
...you are prohibited from removing block notices from this talk page.

...you are prohibited from continuing to behave the way that got you blocked.

...you are prohibited from making personal attacks.

had already revoked your talk page for six hours, but the protection has expired, so I am reminding you: if you really want to continue to edit your talk page, do so in a mature manner.

Do you even remember how many times I reverted your edits on your talk page during your first block? Not one, two, not even three times. But eight times. It was so frustrating. I even told you that that would lead to you being not being able to edit your talk page for the duration of the block, but you seemingly ignored me. Do you know how frustrating that was? It was so frustrating that I practically spammed IRC trying to make you stop.

Continuing to do things you are prohibited from doing from is useless, because then you wouldn't be able to edit your own talk page; please, I beg you, reconsider.

B music  ian  11:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, personal attacks, and general disruption. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoy gabs adds 03:51, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

This blocked user ( [ block log] | [ active blocks] | autoblocks | [ unblock] | contribs | deleted contribs | [ abuse log] ) has had their talkpage access revoked because an administrator has identified this users talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:10, 25 March 2012 (UTC)