User talk:Der under Smurf

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Swedish government crisis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Johan Andersson and Daniel Andersson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, PragerU, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Cassiopeia talk  01:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in PragerU, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲  talk  08:06, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Norsefire. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''Unfortunately the only other area of the article where "England Prevails" is mentioned has already been tagged for original research, and it mentions other mottos as well. They should be sourced, and we shouldn't just be listing the one if there are multiple.'' DonIago (talk) 18:49, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Reconquête
Thanks for your improvements to the article Reconquête, including the addition of the subsection on #Islam and the headscarf, along with the source linking their platform. Also, for fixing the IP vandalism in the "position" field in the Infobox. Regarding "ideology" in the Infobox, "social conservatism" is not covered or sourced in the body of the article and should be covered there, before adding mention of it to the lead, so I removed it. See MOS:LEADNOTUNIQUE for guidance on this. Thanks again for your contributions. Mathglot (talk) 20:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Well the reason for not giving a source is because Zémmour is quite conservative, and the party's values and ideology would probably mirror his views. I figured that it would just be assumed that it was a socially conservative party. But I understand the argument.--Der under Smurf (talk) 06:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Pinging
Hi Der under Smurf,

FYI, if you don't sign your comment, the ping template won't notify anyone. I found that out the hard way. (You have to sign every edit that you ping with, or add a name to the ping template with.) — kwami (talk) 03:07, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you!! I totally forgot to sign it! Thanks!!!--Der under Smurf (talk) 12:40, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)