User talk:Dermato1

Clean Sheet

Bids for the 2032 Summer Olympics moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bids for the 2032 Summer Olympics, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen D. Folf  (talk)  05:01, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (The Final Table) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating The Final Table.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 01:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Yo, I agree! Dermato1 05:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sticker Mule


The page Sticker Mule has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a company, corporation or organization that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bids for the 2032 Summer Olympics


Hello, Dermato1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bids for the 2032 Summer Olympics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 08:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Touch (Daft Punk song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Williams. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James B. Conant High School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. No, the fake ref didn't help Meters (talk) 03:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

@Meters I did not vandalize the page. I added information that had been present for multiple years on the page and as far as I could tell was accurate. My revision acted as a reversion of a previous revision to the page and frankly I think you were a bit aggressive in your accusation. I'll refrain from editing the page though since that's what your intentions are. Dermato1 (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Really? You thought it was accurate? The material was originally removed with the summary: "Removed an sentence that was referencing another high school, in a different state." Obviously you didn't bother to read the reference. I did, and the other editor's summary was correct. You restored trivia that does not belong in the article in the first place, sourced to a ref that does not mention the school. Meters (talk) 18:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * When I see an editor suddenly show up (as the first edit in 9 months) to incorrectly restore an an edit such as this one it looks like a bad faith edit. You say it wasn't vandalism. Fine, remove the warning and be more careful. When you restore challenged information it is on you to verify that the material should actually be restored, and it is not a minor edit to do so. Meters (talk) 18:49, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dwtc.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Dwtc.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)